Hi Ben,
After updating mono and mcs, I fail to build mono on Cygwin.
I have checked with other mono on Cygwin users and I am not the only
one who experiences this problem.
Do we need mcs bootstrap?
Here is the log:
make[7]: Entering directory `/monobuild/mcs/class/corlib'
Hello,
I have installed mono 1.2.8.2 with the installer binary. I succeed to run the
mcs compiler but can neither run monodevelop nor monodoc. The programs throw
a DllNotFoundException i.e.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/mono-1.1.8.2/bin monodevelop
Unhandled Exception:
Atsushi Eno wrote:
The attached patch expects those collation.*.bin files to be in
the same directory as mscorlib.dll exists.
One thing I'd note is that I could *not* build the path to those
files - I tried the same way as mono_init_internal() does to load
mscorlib.dll, but it messed NUnit
Hello,
It can be done in two ways: embed the files in the mono binary like we do
with the char tables or load the files from where mscorlib was loaded.
Both are trivial to implement.
For now I took the latter approach. That means however we need some
love on the build system.
I personally
Hello,
Rafael Mizrahi wrote:
Hi Ben,
After updating mono and mcs, I fail to build mono on Cygwin.
I have checked with other mono on Cygwin users and I am not the only
one who experiences this problem.
Do we need mcs bootstrap?
Here is the log:
make[7]: Entering directory
Hi,
Look at:
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=75579
As I stated in buzilla I was never able to compile Mono using MC csc.exe.
And I allways have to use make EXTERNAL_MCS=/usr/local/bin/mcs
EXTERNAL_RUNTIME=/usr/local/bin/mono instead of simply make on Win32.
I think Mono should
Hello,
Notice that I suggested GetManifestResourceInternal, not the similarly
named GetManifestStream. The managed collaction code uses a Stream
interface.
What am suggesting is that instead of adding a new icall whose purpose
is to return an IntPtr + the size of a special-cased resource,
Hi,
I've downloading gtk-sharp from /trunk/sources on anon svn. Have I got
it right that if I run the ./bootstrap file (and then make; make
install) it should generate the code which correctly creates
the /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gtk-sharp.pc file and the ./bootstrap-2.4
generates the gtk-sharp-2.pc
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 21:09 +0100, Paul wrote:
I've downloading gtk-sharp from /trunk/sources on anon svn. Have I got
it right that if I run the ./bootstrap file (and then make; make
install) it should generate the code which correctly creates
the /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gtk-sharp.pc file and the
Hello,
BTW: Is there an easy way to compile System.Web.dll - i.e. is it all managed
code?
Get the `mcs' module from SVN, and then do:
cd mcs/class/System.Web
make
That will build a System.Web.dll
Miguel.
___
Mono-devel-list
On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 21:09 +0100, Paul wrote:
Hi,
I've downloading gtk-sharp from /trunk/sources on anon svn. Have I got
it right that if I run the ./bootstrap file (and then make; make
install) it should generate the code which correctly creates
the /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gtk-sharp.pc file
Hey!
http://monkey.workarea.jp/tmp/20050725/prof-no-collation.txt
http://monkey.workarea.jp/tmp/20050725/prof-managed-collation.txt
--- no-collation ---
Time(ms) Count P/call(ms) Method name
41982.000 102284.105 Mono.CSharp.Block::Resolve(EmitContext)
Total memory allocated:
What versions of Apache and Mono?
I'm using the FC3 rpm of mod_mono (1.09), converted to a deb via alien.
I'm also using the latest mono installer (1.1.8.2-1).
Can I get some clarification as to what works for you?
Control lives in /Controls/
Page:
/Modules/Legislators/ doesn't work
/
From: Chris Aitken
get an error saying Mapping across application not allowed.
I have only one MonoApplication set up.
As I understand you are trying to map a path inside the application boundary
of the executing application. But you get cross-application mapping error.
If the problem is this
From: Chris Aitken
get an error saying Mapping across application not allowed. I have
only one MonoApplication set up.
As I understand you are trying to map a path inside the application
boundary of the executing application. But you get cross-application
mapping error.
If the
I have reported the bug - Bug#: 75620
Thank you!
Carl Olsen
http://www.carl-olsen.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kornél Pál
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 5:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mono-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: Re:
Hello,
I try to compil GtkSourceView-Sharp-2.0 and i get the following error:
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for MONO_DEPENDENCY... ./configure: line 19407: 30672
Segmentation fault (core dumped) ( $PKG_CONFIG --exists
--print-errors mono = 1.0 ) 25
Chris Aitken wrote:
Whilst most of these replies are on list, I am getting my personal inbox
filled with emails regarding an issue that I have never had.
Having experienced this myself (as the sender, I admit it...), I believe
this to be an issue for most non-frequent posters on this list.
Use Fedora's yum utility.
Heres what I did:
1. vi /etc/yum.repos.d/nrpms and add this to the file
--snip
[nr-production]
name=Fedora Core $releasever - $basearch - nrpms.net/production
#baseurl=http://yum.nrpms.net/fedora-$releasever-$basearch/production/
Still confused ;-). I don't have either of these two files
(/etc/yum.repos.d/nrpms, /etc/yum.repos.d/nrpms-mono.repo). The only similar
ones in /etc are:
yum.repos.d.fedora-devel.repo
yum.repos.d.fedora-extras-devel.repo
yum.repos.d.fedora-extras.repo
yum.repos.d.fedora.repo
You need to _CREATE_ those files.
yum (yellowdog update manager) stores different software repositories in
/etc/yum.repos.d
If you create any files there, yum will try to read them as repositories.
So, you just create those files there with the content I gave you and yum will
be able to read
Glad to hear it worked!
I've also managed to set up mod_mono to run ASP.Net applications on Fedora Core
4!
Peter De Jager wrote:
Thanks for taking the time. I had to read up on vi first :-)
When running 'yum update ligbdiplus' it failed due to a dependency on glitz.
That's probably the
Hi,
I've managed to get mod_mono running on Fedora Core 4. I know a few users have
not been able to, so I am posting the way I did it in the hope that it will
help anyone who wants to do just that.
1. vi /etc/yum.repos.d/nrpms and add this to the file
--snip
[nr-production]
name=Fedora Core
Hi,
Due to the fact that Fedora Core 4 uses gcc 4.0, mono packages can't be
compiled. You get errors at compile-time.
I've been trying to compile some packages (stuck early at libgdiplus).
Here's what I've done so far:
1. Pre-requisites
=
1.1 Glitz
-
$ cvs
I've made 2 test files:
1.h:
--snip--
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include string.h
typedef struct {
char* string;
int length;
} String;
--snip--
1.c:
--snip--
#include 1.h
String s;
int main (int argc, char** argv) {
s.string = (char*)malloc(10);
Hello,
- Could mono be compiled from scratch on Fedora Core 4? ie. without
using the pre-compiled nrpms mono rpms?
The tarball does work out of the box, which is the recommended approach
for people to bootstrap from.
- How to set up /~user/ to handle .aspx pages as mono? I have not been
Hello,
1.2 libgdiplus
--
$ svn co svn://mono.myrealbox.com/source/trunk/libgdiplus
$ cd libgdiplus
Libgdiplus is currently using the 0.4 API of Cairo, so it will not work
with Cairo 0.5 you must use the Cairo bundled with libgdiplus to have it
work.
There is some ongoing work
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Hello,
- Could mono be compiled from scratch on Fedora Core 4? ie. without
using the pre-compiled nrpms mono rpms?
The tarball does work out of the box, which is the recommended approach
for people to bootstrap from.
Well, I've been getting stuck at compiling
Hi,
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Hello,
1.2 libgdiplus
--
$ svn co svn://mono.myrealbox.com/source/trunk/libgdiplus
$ cd libgdiplus
Libgdiplus is currently using the 0.4 API of Cairo, so it will not work
with Cairo 0.5 you must use the Cairo bundled with libgdiplus to have it
work.
Hi,
Due to the fact that Fedora Core 4 uses gcc 4.0, mono packages can't
be compiled. You get errors at compile-time.
Rot!
I know this for a fact as I've been running it quite happily on rawhide
(from FC1 to what is to become FC5) and it's quite happy. There was a
time when there was a
How about a formal forum?
--- Helge Lenuweit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Aitken wrote:
Whilst most of these replies are on list, I am
getting my personal inbox
filled with emails regarding an issue that I have
never had.
Having experienced this myself (as the sender, I
admit
31 matches
Mail list logo
