As requested, I've patched monodocer to (optionally) notice the presence of attributes derived from System.ComponentModel.DescriptionAttribute, and the use descriptions they contain for member summaries instead of the default To be added. When updating old documentation, and the old docs already
(sorry about the previous post in html format)
I'm a newcomer to C#; I'm a Java developer by day. I recently tried to port
a colleague's VS C# app over to Mono, and basically ran into this issue as
well.
I have checked out the latest code (as of yesterday) from svn, built it
using these
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Hey,
What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
Think of a feature that is not something we are currently working
on (we know about those), for example avoid saying: a class-is-missing
feature or IDE or the debugger. We
I've reeopen bug : http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=75172
In our intranet we use remoting, and we have an client interface and a server with many method...
We the number of method exceed 500, mcs crashes badly with :
Unhandled Exception: System.NullReferenceException: Object
Hey,
What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
Think of a feature that is not something we are currently working
on (we know about those), for example avoid saying: a class-is-missing
feature or IDE or the debugger. We know about those.
Miguel.
Something similar
Le mardi 28 mars 2006 20:47 -0500, Miguel de Icaza a crit:
Hey,
What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
Think of a feature that is not something we are currently working
on (we know about those), for example avoid saying: a class-is-missing
feature or IDE
I'd like to see better memory management for long running applications -
particularly in memory fragmentation area that seems to be rather weak
in .NET (and any other GC based language?)
Don't want to throw stones as its amazing what was achieved in Mono, but
IMO, Microsoft's implementation
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 11:33 +0100, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
Don't want to throw stones as its amazing what was achieved in Mono, but
IMO, Microsoft's implementation of Garbage Collection is considerably
better - not speed wise, but reclaiming memory that is no longer in use.
This is because
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 13:02 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
- More support for dynamic languages. Perhaps there's an unsafe way (read:
you have to know what you are doing) to unload types. Or perhaps a
modified mcs could generate code for dynamic methods. Or something else I
haven't thought
Title: Re: [Mono-dev] What would you like to see in Mono?
Hi!
1) The feature which is surely missing is a Compact Mono - equivalent to Compact .NET - however with significantly reduced footprint.
2) Needles to say full implementation of UI based on System.Windows.Forms namespace API - I
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 13:02 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
- More support for dynamic languages. Perhaps there's an unsafe way (read:
you have to know what you are doing) to unload types. Or perhaps a
modified mcs could generate code for dynamic
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Dave Cramer wrote:
Tomi,
You were able to get mono to build on the arm? If so how ?
Hi,
Yes, Mono runtime compiles fine on ARM when using Scratchbox, and mcs and
the classlibs compile fine too if you first build a mono-devkit for
Scratchbox.
Tomi
Jonathan Pryor wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 11:33 +0100, Alex Chudnovsky wrote:
Don't want to throw stones as its amazing what was achieved in Mono, but
IMO, Microsoft's implementation of Garbage Collection is considerably
better - not speed wise, but reclaiming memory that is no longer in
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
Given all the interdependencies between JITed code, executing code, and
call stacks, unloading types is a difficult proposition, which is
probably why an AppDomain unload is the only way to do that under .NET.
Yes, that's probably the reason. Still,
Hi Gonzalo,
What if the response from SMTP server is multi-line? For example, SMTP
from IIS 6.0 returns multi-line response on EHLO command.
Vladimir Krasnov
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalo
Paniagua Javier
Sent: Tuesday, March
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am the developer and i shouldn't make my users test that kind of
stuff. It is
i who should test it. Only when i can make it work for myself, should i make
my
users use such.
Anyway, my first attempt failed miserably, i don't like the idea of my program
beeing
What i'd like to see in mono is the ability to start up an application
without it needing a .WAPI folder. I understand why mono needs the wapi
folder, but i'm sure there are application for which one wouldn't need one
at all.
- Original Message -
From: Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL
Thanks! That will take a while, I expect. I've not yet gotten all the nuances down regarding the mono compile vs the windows project.wadeOn 3/28/06,
Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I want to see if I can single step the code under linux. The mdb is 0.12 on centos.The entire
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 06:40 -0800, Vladimir Krasnov wrote:
Hi Gonzalo,
What if the response from SMTP server is multi-line? For example, SMTP
from IIS 6.0 returns multi-line response on EHLO command.
Did you care taking a look at the RFC to know how the client knows that
it has to read
Here are my ideas I would like to see for Mono, Gtk#, and applications.1. I would love to see afully managed CLI runtime.The fully managed CLI runtime would be written completely inmanaged languages like C#, IL, and Boo. The whole thing does not have to be written in one language. Various
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 10:56 -0500, Gonzalo Paniagua Javier wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 06:40 -0800, Vladimir Krasnov wrote:
Hi Gonzalo,
What if the response from SMTP server is multi-line? For example, SMTP
from IIS 6.0 returns multi-line response on EHLO command.
Did you care taking
Jacek Blaszczynski wrote:
3) Equivalent of WPF for future GUI requirements but cross platform -
I know Migual blog entries about Avalon but a Gtk sharp as an
alternative is really far too short of achieving anything impressive.
QT4 bindings to provide an alternative to WinForms and GTK# for
Hello,
Attached a small refactoring for HttpApplicationFactory
class enabling having the common code base with J2EE platform.
For J2EE this solves the global static variables
problem.
If no one objects Ill commit.
Regards,
Konstantin Triger
Hi,
This stretched out a bit more than I originally intended. :)
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 20:47 -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
Although not really in Mono itself, one thing I would like to see is
better integration with automake.
1) -Remote debugger---
Debugging remote mono executables from the IDE. Be it SharpDevelop,
MonoDevelop, Eclipse, etc.
I hope I didn't miss the functionality if it already exists, please let me
know!!
Microsoft's solution for debugging a remote program is not the most
streamlined
F-spot was a good example to use. I was meaning F-spot plus extra features. For instance, I would like to take an application like F-Spot and modify for my own special needs. Or create an entirely new application. Let's say whenever you talk to a customer on a phone, the audio from that is
Hi guys,
I needed and tree data structure build out of similar objects. Each of
those objects is simply an ArrayList with some overhead needed for my
application. Obviously those objects can contain any number of
subobjects and so forth.
I have two questions related to that approach:
1. Is it a
Hi.
Can someone tell me who is responsible for bugzilla.ximian.com? I
would like to use the ctype=csv option but I do not know who to talk
to.
Thanks,
Jacob
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
more monkeys please.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Thanks for a quick reply. So, there could be two cases. One being to
initialize DateTime, and the second, to use a different serialization
format. One, as XML does not have default initializer we had written a
code to perform the initialization of date to July 1, 1850, so looks
like thats
Larry Ewing wrote:
F-Spot has the
start of a sane binding that I did in my spare time. I plan to finish
it at some point. TWAIN is unlikely as it can involve direct win32
calls.
TWAIN's available on Mac OS X, too. With some abstraction it should be
reasonably possible to support both Win32
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 08:47 -0800, Konstantin Triger wrote:
Hello,
Attached a small refactoring for HttpApplicationFactory class enabling
having the common code base with J2EE platform.
For J2EE this solves the “global static variables” problem.
Feel free to commit in HEAD.
-Gonzalo
Just one topic commented, that also adds my personal request.
On 3/29/06, Joe Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
And one thing that has always bugged me: my apps all behave strangely
and then crash when I recompile underneath a running instance. That's
very annoying, and I suspect it's also a
Rusmin Susanto wrote:
If I need to access the operator quite often, I am afraid that a
numerous calls to new will slow down the program (as it needs to
allocate 200 x 200 array of double).
You're asking if, in A + B + C + D + E + F, only one new allocation can be made,
is that correct? If
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 19:41 -0300, Rafael Teixeira wrote:
We need to implement shadow copying to allow for changes on running
assemblies (but aside from ASP.NET where it is enabled by default,
even on MS' .NET one need to turn it on explicitly for every AppDomain
that needs it).
That turns
Hi Miguel,
What would be the top feature you would like to
see in Mono?
1) Explicit (GC_Free style) assembly unloading.
2) Assembly unloading via application domain unload.
3) Full bytecode verification.
(But you knew that)
;-)
Cheers,
Jim/Babbage.
Em Ter, 2006-03-28 às 20:47 -0500, Miguel de Icaza escreveu:
What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
A talking clip for MonoDevelop. Everytime I need something I think oh,
the IDE should show a little cute clip with that information for me!
Maybe the clip could be used
The option to somehow merge (or at least synchronize) your MS.NET GAC and
your mono GAC would be nice. There probably is a very good reason not to do
this that I haven't thought of yet though.
-Matt McDonald
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Tomi,
You were able to get mono to build on the arm? If so how ?
Very Interested,
Dave
On 29-Mar-06, at 5:02 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Hey,
What would be the top feature you would like to see in Mono?
Think of a feature that is not
Hi,
I have been having difficulties compiling mono (1.1.13.6) from source on
my FC4 machine (using the standard fedora compiler gcc 4.0.2). The
attached simple patch has solved my problems (in that I can get things
to compile now) but I'm not sure whether this is the correct solution.
Cheers,
Hello all,
First to say: Mono is great! I love it!
Yesterday, while doing some dumb fitness training, one question came
into my mind. What if microsoft decides not to support the native
executable (PE) format any longer? What if they say: The one and only
executable file format we support is the
Norbert,
Yesterday, while doing some dumb fitness training, one question came
Next time open a window and get a breath of fresh air ;-)
into my mind. What if microsoft decides not to support the native
executable (PE) format any longer? What if they say: The one and only
executable file
On 3/29/06, Salvatore Scarciglia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:15:22 -0500Carl Hume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,this is the right one:using System;class Hello {public static void Main() {
Console.WriteLine(
Hello, World! );}}First of all: Main method must return a valid type
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 11:59 +0200, Norbert Berzen wrote:
Yesterday, while doing some dumb fitness training, one question came
into my mind. What if microsoft decides not to support the native
executable (PE) format any longer? What if they say: The one and only
executable file format we
Hello Norbert,
Norbert Berzen schrieb:
What if microsoft decides not to support the native
executable (PE) format any longer? What if they say: The one and only
executable file format we support is the CLR/CLI (PE) format.
What happens to mono in that case? Maybe the answer is obvious, but
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:35:00 -0500
Carl Hume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
using System;
class Hello {
public static void Main() {
Console.WriteLine( Hello, World! );
}
}
Hi Carl,
I'm using mono 1.1.13.1 on my Ubuntu 5.10 and the code you have posted is
Hi all,
on my web site you will find my new application; it's name is YouTranslate!
and is a small and simple software that lets you use the available internet
Translation Services (such as BabelFish,Google,and so on) with a minimalistic
user interface.
For more information, screenshot and
Hi,
I'm involved in a project where we need to develop a server which
hosts webservices (w/ support for attachments). We are mainly a java
shop, so that's the platforma the server will run on. We most likely
will need to interop with a dotnet client. I've gone through this
process before
Paolo Molaro wrote:
On 03/24/06 Redefined Horizons wrote:
I'm realtively new to Linux and Mono, so please be
patient if I ask something obvious. :]
I'd like to get Mono installed on my Debian Linux box.
I'm running the stable version of Debian Sarge. Should I
try to use a Debian package
Tony G wrote:
Paolo, I must disagree. In a recent thread of mine here (Dependency
issues with 1.1.13) I mentioned that the current Mono was built using an
old version of SQLite.
This particular issue is a packaging error. The RPMs shouldn't be
listing libsqlite.so.0 as a dependency because
Has anyone been able to get mod_mono to compile on a system with Apache
2.2? When I run ./configure --prefix=/usr it says it can't determine
which Apache version I have. So I try ./configure --prefix=/usr
--with-apr-config=/usr/bin/apr-1-config and the configure script thinks
I'm running
last time i checked, support for Apache 2.2 is only available in svn
head, might have change now tho.
On 3/29/06, David P. Donahue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone been able to get mod_mono to compile on a system with Apache
2.2? When I run ./configure --prefix=/usr it says it can't
Stephan Eberle escribió:
Hi El,
That's a good start. Do you know of any possibility to point out the device
(eth0, eth1, wlan0, ...) behind each address?
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.mono.devel/16576
Regards,
Andrés [ knocte ]
--
last time i checked, support for Apache 2.2 is only available in svn
head, might have change now tho.
I'm installing subversion right now. Having only used CVS in the past,
and only specific commands to grab specific packages, maybe I'm just not
familiar. But what does head mean in that?
You can start here
http://www.mono-project.com/AnonSVN
http://www.mono-project.com/SVN
On 3/29/06, David P. Donahue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
last time i checked, support for Apache 2.2 is only available in svn
head, might have change now tho.
I'm installing subversion right now. Having
Hi everyone,
I'm just wondering if anyone has actually managed to build a .NET CF
application (which actually runs on a pocket pc / windows mobile device)
using mono.
I've been trying to get bits to compile (using the dlls from the .NET CF
runtime), but I generally run into the problem of most
Simple question... I know that the latest Fedora, and Suse builds have
some mono pre-setup... I had issues with Suse, and Fedora didn't seem to
include the mod_mono/apache support with the distro, and had trouble
trying to build it...
I've setup before under older distro's, and haven't touched
I have been developing an application in Visual Studio 2003 which makes use of a toolbar. I am able to compile this under Mono but when I attempt to display the Window I get the following errors reported... Unhandled Exception:
System.Resources.MissingManifestResourceException: Could not find any
Any news on the mono forums? :-)
Paddy
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Hello,
A lot of people have asked us about hosting some official forums
for Mono. Am not a fan of them, but I can see the appeal of these
things.
If we were to host this, we would probably want to run this on top
of Mono
59 matches
Mail list logo
