I replied to you privately simply because I hit Reply and I didn't
bother to check if the CC field was automatically put to mono-list or
not.
About Microsoft and FUD, this is the article that scared me:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2050848,00.asp?kc=EWEWEMNL103006EP17A
You know what .. I
Ok, I thought you were just offending us by dare putting flaming
subject, but after messages it is not a strong intention. So it's just
one of a lot room for interpretation (in your words). I accept your
apologize thus I also apologize for you for taking the worst possibility
on your intention.
Alexandru Nedelcu wrote:
Hi,
I always respected Miguel de Icaza's judgment and he always has a good
and sane point of view.
I am a little troubled about the recent announcement, about the
Novell/Microsoft agreement.
Obviously you don't appreciate much from his posts before, as it is
very
uncool Atsushi
you probably want to try and use more tack in your correspondence
Alex wasn't deserving of such a tirade, who pissed in your cornflakes
this morning anyways?
-tl
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 09:34 +0900, Atsushi Eno wrote:
Alexandru Nedelcu wrote:
Hi,
I always respected
ted leslie wrote:
uncool Atsushi
you probably want to try and use more tack in your correspondence
Alex wasn't deserving of such a tirade, who pissed in your cornflakes
this morning anyways?
No, you are wrong. There is no other reason than spreading FUD
on the subject he dare put.
He
