Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-09-23 Thread Wade Berrier
The MonoDevelop rpms on go-mono.com have been updated to fix this. The Linux Installer has also been updated. Wade On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 10:45 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Running Mono 1.1.9. Installed from SuSE 9.3 RPMs, after uninstalling Mono, due to a problems after installing Mono

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-23 Thread Daniel Lopez
Hola! Back onto point a bit here. I have noticed a couple recurring trends. #1) People who use the installer, and not the rpms, and then install gtk# 1.9.5 into a *different* prefix than the installer, and then install MD seem to have the most issues. To me, and Daniel can correct me if I

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-23 Thread peter
Todd Berman wrote: Back onto point a bit here. I have noticed a couple recurring trends. #1) People who use the installer, and not the rpms, and then install gtk# 1.9.5 into a *different* prefix than the installer, and then install MD seem to have the most issues. To me, and Daniel can correct

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-23 Thread netSQL
Not to add flame to fire, what I did was used dag rpm repositories to do apt-get (http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt), which installed mono develop .5 in 1 step. yum would also work I assume. I have no idea how to install red carpet on fedora. Since I could not figure out how to make .7, I

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
I have SuSE 9.3 Pro. I tried the above, and I've tried installing from source. No joy. I just get a message (from rug) saying that /usr/bin/monodevelop doesn't exist (which is true). If I try to install from source I get the gtksourceview message that others have mentioned, when I do

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread peter
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: I'm running monodevelop successfully on SuSe 9.3. 1. Forget all this rug stuff, it doesn't work; I fiddled with it for a long time. 2. Remove ALL SuSe's mono packages, this requires removing Beagle and Tomboy but you can put them in again later. 3. Download the

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
I'm running monodevelop successfully on SuSe 9.3. 1. Forget all this rug stuff, it doesn't work; I fiddled with it for a long time. 2. Remove ALL SuSe's mono packages, this requires removing Beagle and Tomboy but you can put them in again later. 3. Download the packages from

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread peter
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: 9.3 is new, as is Monodevelop 0.7; these things will sort themselves out. I've been using rug/red-carpet since Ximian released it, it is an excellent product and solution. Yes. I appreciate that and I'm certainly prepared to cut them a bit of slack. a) What

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Carl Olsen
Olsen http://www.carl-olsen.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of peter Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 11:58 AM To: mono-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7 Adam Tauno Williams wrote: 9.3 is new, as is Monodevelop 0.7

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread peter
Carl Olsen wrote: I'm just going to live with the fact that monodevelop isn't going to run on My SuSE 9.2 Pro now that I've upgraded to Mono 1.1.7. Everything else seems to be working, so I'll consider myself fortunate that this is the only thing I've lost. Whoever posted the instructions for

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Carl Olsen
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of peter Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 3:16 PM To: mono-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7 Carl Olsen wrote: I'm just going to live with the fact that monodevelop isn't going to run on My SuSE 9.2 Pro now

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Ben Maurer
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 14:02 -0500, Carl Olsen wrote: I'm just going to live with the fact that monodevelop isn't going to run on My SuSE 9.2 Pro now that I've upgraded to Mono 1.1.7. Everything else seems to be working, so I'll consider myself fortunate that this is the only thing I've lost.

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Carl Olsen
22, 2005 3:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'peter'; mono-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7 On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 14:02 -0500, Carl Olsen wrote: I'm just going to live with the fact that monodevelop isn't going to run on My SuSE 9.2 Pro now that I've upgraded to Mono

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread peter
Ben Maurer wrote: I don't know why MonoDevelop breaks with 1.1.7. MonoDevelop has often been an application that is tightly integrated to a specific version of Mono. Your best bet to get things working is 0.7, with the newest MD and Mono. -- Ben I don't understand that, Ben. I thought

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Ben Maurer
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 15:59 -0500, Carl Olsen wrote: That sounds great. This has only been a minor inconvenience for me. Mono is great stuff and monodevelop is a great tool. I was surprised to see it break, but not overly surprised. I realize this stuff is still under heavy development. I

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread peter
Carl Olsen wrote: That sounds great. This has only been a minor inconvenience for me. Mono is great stuff and monodevelop is a great tool. I was surprised to see it break, but not overly surprised. I realize this stuff is still under heavy development. I started running Mono on Red Hat 8

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Carl Olsen
: RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7 Btw, you can do net install for free: ftp://suse.cs.utah.edu/pub/suse.com/suse/i386/9.3/ There are some instructions: http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/topic-42582.html -- Ben ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Ben Maurer
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 16:31 -0500, Carl Olsen wrote: It says the full version is not yet available. The last post in the forum recommends buying it. What exactly is a mini? I've no idea. I can try asking around here. -- Ben ___ Mono-list maillist

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Carl Olsen
I didn't know you could upgrade for free. That helps! Thank you! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of peter Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 4:15 PM To: mono-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7 Carl Olsen wrote

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Carl Olsen
be watching that forum. Carl -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Maurer Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 4:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: mono-list@lists.ximian.com; 'peter' Subject: RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7 On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 16:31 -0500

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Carl Olsen
Microsoft does not release an upgrade every few months. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of peter Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 4:15 PM To: mono-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7 Carl Olsen wrote: That sounds great

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread peter
Carl Olsen wrote: Microsoft does not release an upgrade every few months. Well, I don't want to start a flame war here, Carl :), but as I pointed out: * You don't have to upgrade SuSE every time a new version appears * You get 2 and a bit SuSE upgrades for the price of one MS upgrade -

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Ben Maurer
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 08:16 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use Mandrake Linux, and install from the SuSE RPMs (I can't find a reliable Mandrake (sorry Mandriva) set of RPMS), and they install well enough - occassionally I have to use --force because of dependency clashes - and everything

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Carl Olsen
Hey, I'm happy now that I know how to get the free upgrades! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of peter Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 5:06 PM To: mono-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7 Carl Olsen wrote: Microsoft

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-22 Thread Todd Berman
Back onto point a bit here. I have noticed a couple recurring trends. #1) People who use the installer, and not the rpms, and then install gtk# 1.9.5 into a *different* prefix than the installer, and then install MD seem to have the most issues. To me, and Daniel can correct me if I am wrong, but

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread peter
Ben Maurer wrote: You can type rug ref as root, and that refreshes. Or if you like to use the gui, your instructions will work. -- Ben Hi, I have SuSE 9.3 Pro. I tried the above, and I've tried installing from source. No joy. I just get a message (from rug) saying that /usr/bin/monodevelop

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread Ben Maurer
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 18:23 +0100, peter wrote: Ben Maurer wrote: You can type rug ref as root, and that refreshes. Or if you like to use the gui, your instructions will work. -- Ben Hi, I have SuSE 9.3 Pro. I tried the above, and I've tried installing from source. No joy. I

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread peter
Ben Maurer wrote: Once you are at that point, you have to `rug in monodevelop' and everything should work fine. -- Ben Thanks Ben, but it still doesn't work, I'm afraid: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/bin su Password: linux:/usr/bin # rug in monodevelop Using monodevelop 0.7-1.novell from the 'Tools

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread Ben Maurer
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 18:50 +0100, peter wrote: Ben Maurer wrote: Once you are at that point, you have to `rug in monodevelop' and everything should work fine. -- Ben Thanks Ben, but it still doesn't work, I'm afraid: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/bin su Password: linux:/usr/bin #

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread peter
Ben Maurer wrote: rug rm monodoc, and then do the install. This is because SUSE does not yet make monodoc noarch, and there is a somewhat broken rule that they forbid people from going to a different package arch. -- Ben Well, we're making progress, but we're not there yet, I'm afraid. The

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread Ben Maurer
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 19:35 +0100, peter wrote: Ben Maurer wrote: rug rm monodoc, and then do the install. This is because SUSE does not yet make monodoc noarch, and there is a somewhat broken rule that they forbid people from going to a different package arch. -- Ben Well,

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread peter
Ben Maurer wrote: That's interesting :-). You could say that (in fact you just did) :) Can you run from the command line, maybe there is stuff there. -- Ben Good thinking. Here's the output. Doesn't mean a lot to me, I'm afraid. I hope it means a bit more to you! [EMAIL

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread peter
peter wrote: Ben Maurer wrote: That's interesting :-). You could say that (in fact you just did) :) Can you run from the command line, maybe there is stuff there. -- Ben Good thinking. snip / Sorry to follow up my own post. Just to say I tried the following - without luck as you will see:

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread Carl Olsen
I tried rug ref and got nothing. I tried the same thing in the GUI and got nothing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of peter Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 12:23 PM To: mono-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7 Ben

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread Carl Olsen
| Tools for mono -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of peter Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 12:50 PM To: mono-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7 Ben Maurer wrote: Once you are at that point, you have to `rug

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread Ben Maurer
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 14:36 -0500, Carl Olsen wrote: I'm getting a message saying it can't find monodevelop in any subscribed channels. I'm subscribed to subd? | Alias| Name --+--+--- Yes | gtk-sharp-official | Gtk# 1.0.x Yes |

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread peter
Carl Olsen wrote: I guess this means that upgrading to Mono 1.1.7 on SuSe 9.2 Pro causes monodevelop to stop working. That was my experience, and the reason I upgraded to 9.3. However it doesn't seem to be straightforward to get it to work on SuSE 9.3 Pro either: at least not for me. :(

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread Carl Olsen
' Subject: RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7 On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 14:36 -0500, Carl Olsen wrote: I'm getting a message saying it can't find monodevelop in any subscribed channels. I'm subscribed to subd? | Alias| Name --+--+--- Yes

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread peter
Kirill wrote: Hi, Did you try running MD after removing gtksourceview-sharp? I'm not in Linux currently, so I can't check that, but I am guessing that maybe there were 2 versions installed on your computer, which interferred with each other? What's MD? Your diagnosis is probably correct,

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread peter
peter wrote: What's MD? Doh!!! Sorry. Just realised. Yes I did try to rerun it after removal. No luck Cheers Peter ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Re: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-20 Thread peter
Kirill wrote: Hi, Did you try running MD after removing gtksourceview-sharp? I'm not in Linux currently, so I can't check that, but I am guessing that maybe there were 2 versions installed on your computer, which interferred with each other? Nope. That didn't work either. Went into synaptic

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-19 Thread Ben Maurer
Are you guys using 0.7-1? I had to update the rpms to fix a packaging error. You may have to rug ref to get the newer md. -- Ben ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-19 Thread Carl Olsen
My version says 0.5 Carl -Original Message- From: Ben Maurer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Collin Goredema'; mono-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7 Are you guys using 0.7-1? I had to update

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-19 Thread Ben Maurer
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 22:55 -0500, Carl Olsen wrote: What is rug ref? refresh. 0.5 is way too old, you should upgrade to the packages on the downloads page. -- Ben ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-19 Thread Mauro Parra Miranda
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 22:55 -0500, Carl Olsen wrote: What is rug ref? Type it in the console as root. Or just launch red-carpet and press the reload button. you will download the lastest packages. Then just press 'update' and that's it. Cheers, Mauro

RE: [Mono-list] MonoDevelop 0.7

2005-05-19 Thread Ben Maurer
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 23:12 -0500, Mauro Parra Miranda wrote: On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 22:55 -0500, Carl Olsen wrote: What is rug ref? Type it in the console as root. Or just launch red-carpet and press the reload button. you will download the lastest packages. Then just press 'update' and