On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:16:28PM -0600, Derek Scherger wrote:
> I actually kinda liked the early regex code that took an unadorned
> string as a simple collection and a /string/ as a regex. Persumably now
> the unadorned string could be taken as a glob instead of a collection
> prefix.
/slash/ s
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Currently, on mainline, push/pull/sync have been changed to take a
> regular expression instead of a collection -- collections don't exist
> anymore. Functionally, this is great; UI-wise, I'm wondering how cool
> it really is to be typing "net\.venge\.monotone(|\..*)" or w
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:56:44 -0700, Nathaniel
Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
njs> Currently, on mainline, push/pull/sync have been changed to take a
njs> regular expression instead of a collection -- collections don't exist
njs> anymore. Functionally, this is grea
Nathaniel Smith spake unto us the following wisdom:
> Currently, on mainline, push/pull/sync have been changed to take a
> regular expression instead of a collection -- collections don't exist
> anymore. Functionally, this is great; UI-wise, I'm wondering how cool
> it really is to be typing "net\
>From a UI standpoint, it sounds like all of this takes what most
people need to do ( sync collections ) and made it more complex to do
so. When monotone syncs on a regexep, do you still have a clear
audit trail in the logs? Guess I need to play with the new code
dan
On 6/21/05, Nathaniel
Currently, on mainline, push/pull/sync have been changed to take a
regular expression instead of a collection -- collections don't exist
anymore. Functionally, this is great; UI-wise, I'm wondering how cool
it really is to be typing "net\.venge\.monotone(|\..*)" or whatever?
Would it be better to
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:47:01PM +1000, Robert Leftwich wrote:
> A simple:
>
> monotone: already up to date at 56ece60be1a574b54f7e130cd0caf60ed0811ef5
> BUT - unmerged heads exists
>
> would be sufficient.
And, thanks to Jeremy Cowgar, already implemented in 0.19 ;-).
(Similarly, 0
