Greetings,
Here is a monotonerc file implmenting the get_passphrase hook. It reads
a file from the conf dir for the passphrases and expects them to be
formatted as follows:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "This is the passphrase"
It should support multiple passphrases. This was developed for use with
m
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:44:50AM +0300, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote:
> May be I miss something, but can you clarify the status of 0.26 and
> procedure of pull from venge.net?
>
> [the reason of question is a problems with pull with 0.26pre1 client,
> inspired by two heads in net.venge.monotone branch].
On Thursday 09 March 2006 15:08, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:44:50AM +0300, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote:
> > May be I miss something, but can you clarify the status of 0.26 and
> > procedure of pull from venge.net?
> >
> > [the reason of question is a problems with pull with 0.26p
I am willing to pay a good bounty for a reproducible build process for
monotone-viz on cygwin. That is, whatever needs to be done to
monotone-viz or to the environment that will get it to compile against
a basic cygwin installation, the monotone-viz included lablgtk, and a
monotone compiled against
Thanks for the response, Nathaniel. I will just leave it alone until
0.26 is final, and then upgrade my team to it.
Some other stuff:
My team has been using monotone since last June and it's been
terrific. We have a number of long-lived branches, and while we get
the occasional spurious merge iss
Hi everyone,
we are currently using Monotone 0.18 for version control in our
business, which works great for us. However, from reading the webpage,
it seems that there have already been some new versions released which
require migration of the database or even a complete rebuild of the
version his
On 3/10/06, Markus Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> we are currently using Monotone 0.18 for version control in our
> business, which works great for us. However, from reading the webpage,
> it seems that there have already been some new versions released which
> require migratio
"Justin Patrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *18*? Wow, that's a bit behind the times. A lot has changed.
It's not so hard to imagine. For example, Debian stable ships with
Monotone 0.18, and some people are happy working with packages only
found in the stable release of their favorite distribut
On 2/7/06, Olivier Andrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just released monotone-viz 0.13
...
Call me crazy, but I can't find the branch drop-down box in monotone-viz 0.13.
Cheers,
Shaun
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.o
Chad Walstrom wrote:
"Justin Patrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*18*? Wow, that's a bit behind the times. A lot has changed.
It's not so hard to imagine. For example, Debian stable ships with
Monotone 0.18, and some people are happy working with packages only
found in the stable release of t
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Why switch?
> -- Real-world usage shows, many many users do not like the long
> name, and alias it to something shorter.
Yay for MTN!!!
I'm a "mtn" user since day 0, AFAIR I created the symlink even before
trying it ;-)
(and before discovering other people were using
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 20:43 -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> > -- "mtn" -- the boring, generic choice. Of course, sometimes boring
> > is good.
>
> It's also what I use, so it's clearly superior. :p
I agree, although not for this reason.
I never found typing monotone to be too much of
Could someone with access to both unix and win32 monotone's try:
-- on unix, checking in a tree containing a file named "mt/foo"
-- on windows, checking out this tree, and reporting on what
happens? Especially, whether the file mt/foo ends up in MT/?
It would be nice to know for both 0.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Should we want to differentiate ourselves in google searches, perhaps
> trying a few names on google now might be useful.
>
> mmm -- 8,490,000 Google hits
> mm -- 109,000,000
> m -- 1,340,000,000
> mtn -- 6,410,000
> mon -- 206,000,000
> monotone -- 2,950,000
>
But a
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:18:58PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> If this is to change, let's please use .MTN (or equivalent for the
> eventual name), and make it selectable by a hook in
> ~/monotone/monotonerc or the environment.
I'm not going to make any pronouncements about what might be
imple
On Saturday 04 March 2006 10:15, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Could someone with access to both unix and win32 monotone's try:
> -- on unix, checking in a tree containing a file named "mt/foo"
> -- on windows, checking out this tree, and reporting on what
> happens? Especially, whether the fi
On Saturday 04 March 2006 09:46, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> So the possibilities that come to my mind are:
> -- Use .mtn for the bookkeeping dir, and keep .monotone as the
> config dir. This seems sort of weird, though I guess it's what
> both bzr-ng and svn do. I also share Matt's mild
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 12:46:52AM -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> The other exciting thing is that in my first email, I forgot about the
> config directory, ~/.monotone. Presumably this name should also match
> the name of the executable.
Oh, I dunno. All the .stuff should be .monotone* surely?
Nathaniel Smith pobox.com> writes:
> To spoil the ending, I'm going to suggest we switch to the name "mtn"
> for 0.26 and going forward.
I'm definitely for it... partly because I like innovation/change, but even more
so because it would be no change at all for me: as far as I remember I did add
Another vote for 'mtn' from me.
Gut reaction to other contenders (in addition to all being poorer
abbreviations):
mt: name collisions are bad
m: too cute
mmm: too annoying to type
moto: just don't like it ;)
But none of the possible outcomes will make me howl with rage or
anything.
-emile
sig
On 2/26/06, Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> What to switch to:
> -- "mt" is the most natural choice, but not available. Annoying,
> since no-one uses the old mt command anymore, but there you go.
> -- I'm kind of fond of "m" (take _that_, you upstart 2-letter
> sys
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 4 Mar 2006 01:47:42 -0800, Nathaniel
Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
njs> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:17:15PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
wrote:
njs> > Uhmm, please no. A dot file like that is a portability
njs> > nightmare, trust me (I'm still pla
I've just committed a minimal change to 0.25 to close the recently
discovered security hole. This bug allows one person with commit
access to run arbitrary code on the machines of people who check out
their tree. The proposed 0.25.1 works on my machine, but I'd
appreciate hearing from other peopl
On 3/4/06, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 4 Mar 2006 01:47:42 -0800, Nathaniel
> Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> njs> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:17:15PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
> wrote:
> njs> > Uhmm, please no.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 4 Mar 2006 20:11:23 -0800, "Justin
Patrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
papercrane> Am I just being dense or wouldn't a simple conditional
papercrane> #define fix this?
Does this answer your question (a few of those are not the admin
directory, so the real num
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 05 Mar 2006 07:07:10 +0100 (CET),
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
richard> Anyway, I think my piece on the subject...
That was supposed to be "Anyway, I think I've said my piece..."
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring
26 matches
Mail list logo
