On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:25:35AM -0500, Ben Walton wrote:
I don't want the clients seeing _MTN/*.
I accept your assertion, but am curious about your reasons :-). It
seems like _MTN/* takes completely negligible space, and provides
potentially valuable information?
I realize that this could
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:04:22PM -0500, Ben Walton wrote:
I cooked this up today as a corollary to get_option. I hope it's useful.
So, umm... before investing time in reviewing the patch, rewriting
internal interfaces, answering future support questions, etc... _do_
you have any ideas where
Nathaniel J. Smith schrieb:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:04:22PM -0500, Ben Walton wrote:
I cooked this up today as a corollary to get_option. I hope it's useful.
So, umm... before investing time in reviewing the patch, rewriting
internal interfaces, answering future support questions, etc...
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:47:32AM +0100, Thomas Keller wrote:
Nathaniel J. Smith schrieb:
If you want to include the information into automate stdio's stdout
stream, you need to multiplex it in somehow, and I don't have any
particular opinion on what the best way would be to write such
Nathaniel J. Smith schrieb:
I'm afraid this is rather hypothetical for me to have anything useful
to say. If you just want to be able to take arbitrary text from
monotone and dump it at the user, I suppose capturing stderr is not
too hard either...
Yes, of course, but then I think stderr in
On 12/22/06, Nathaniel J. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:25:35AM -0500, Ben Walton wrote:
I don't want the clients seeing _MTN/*.
I accept your assertion, but am curious about your reasons :-). It
seems like _MTN/* takes completely negligible space, and provides
Yah, I'm new, but I may be missing the point a little still. When
thinking in the context of wrapping mtn in a gui (the whole point of
the automate commands), isn't it desirable to have a programmatic
interface to things like the options file?
It's not a mainstream, everyday feature by any
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 01:22:21AM +0100, Thomas Keller wrote:
Don't get me wrong, but how is he supposed to know that?
Well, because I just told him :-). Maybe he will find the information
useful, maybe not. I guess there are a few possible outcomes. Maybe
neither Ben nor anyone else
