On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:52:25 -0500, Stephen Leake
wrote:
I'll be very sad if I'm forced to abandon monotone because of changing
tools.
I feel the same way. I should mention that good project managment
software, like Indefero, is essential for the “public image” of Monotone.
I also have
Thomas Keller writes:
> Am 13.12.11 00:33, schrieb Judson Lester:
>> [...] So, seeing an email from a few months back that seemed to suggest that
>> monotone is kind of done - no one seems to be keen to continue
>> development, and everyone seems satisfied - was a little disheartening.
>>
>> Wha
I wouldn't say that monotone is "done"; in addition to the things you
listed, I can think of quite a few other things that badly need doing,
such as
* speed improvements
* netsync bandwidth and latency improvements
* memory-use and disk-space-use improvements
* a sensible URL scheme
* a replacemen
Am 13.12.11 00:33, schrieb Judson Lester:
> [...] So, seeing an email from a few months back that seemed to suggest that
> monotone is kind of done - no one seems to be keen to continue
> development, and everyone seems satisfied - was a little disheartening.
>
> What is the status of monotone as
I remember back in the pre-1.0 days, there were a number of ideas related
to monotone fundamentals that were promising, but I don't remember having
been implemented. What's the status of those ideas? Are they still being
discussed on the wiki somewhere, or here?
Specifically, I remember question
