Re: [Monotone-devel] [OT] version control discussion forum

2007-05-18 Thread Cem Karan
On May 18, 2007, at 8:10 AM, Timothy Brownawell wrote: On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 08:07 -0400, Cem Karan wrote: Hi all, I remember seeing someone mention that there is a website dedicated to discussing all the issues surrounding version control, one that is geared toward fundamental design questions

[Monotone-devel] [OT] version control discussion forum

2007-05-18 Thread Cem Karan
the link (sorry for the question being so fuzzy; my memory is so vague on it that I can't even get good hits on google for it, or by grepping the mail archives) Thanks, Cem Karan ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http

Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync transport encryption?

2006-10-25 Thread Cem Karan
and run with it! :D Thanks, Cem Karan ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

[Monotone-devel] Re: netsync transport encryption?

2006-10-25 Thread Cem Karan
should be to refuse it completely. That will protect newbies like me from shooting ourselves in the foot! Thanks, Cem Karan ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: netsync transport encryption?

2006-10-25 Thread Cem Karan
and real authentication. I make no guarantees about security without authentication! ;) Thanks, Cem Karan ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

[Monotone-devel] Re: Monotone-devel Digest, Vol 42, Issue 59

2006-10-25 Thread Cem Karan
-8; format=flowed On 10/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 04:31:56PM +0200, Ulf Ochsenfahrt wrote: Cem Karan wrote: In short, you would lose authentication and guarantees of privacy if you don't have each other's public keys, but it shouldn't affect