as a user, my self-interest wants monotone to be stable and bulletproof above all else.
so if this issue distracts from that...
RS
On 6/13/06, Graydon Hoare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nathaniel Smith wrote: We all definitely agree that (0) is fine, and that (6) is not. Therefore, we probably each
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 01:24:23AM -0700, Graydon Hoare wrote:
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
If you made it this far, thanks for reading :-). I'll probably start
implementing this in the next few weeks (assuming that the response to
this isn't an overwhelming this would be a horrible violation and
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:55:03PM -0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Here are some options on how one could gather usage data from users:
[..]
We all definitely agree that (0) is fine, and that (6) is not.
(Dan Carosone: I'd love to hear your answer here too, since you've
also come down strongly
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
We all definitely agree that (0) is fine, and that (6) is not.
Therefore, we probably each have some first number that we think would
be unacceptable. When you say Don't do it, do you mean that for
you, the line of acceptability falls between (0) and (1), (1) is
already
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
If you made it this far, thanks for reading :-). I'll probably start
implementing this in the next few weeks (assuming that the response to
this isn't an overwhelming this would be a horrible violation and
can't be done at all!), but really want to make sure that we get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timothy Brownawell wrote:
Some anonymous usage statistics have been collected in $CONFDIR/stats.
Run mtn usage-stats send to send this to the developers. The database
of collected statistics is publicly available at
My general take on this:
* I don't mind so much information is gathered, but
I would appreciate being able to see exactly what is sent
* Branch names are sensitive because we branch
per feature / bug fix with the bug identifier in the branch name
* Directory/file names are sensitve for
