Hello monotoners, Shaun, this is Tomas Fasth pinging the monotone world. I am very sorry for having been absent for such a long time, but I have been busy recovering from a minor stroke. I have been suggesting Shaun to take over the maintainership of the monotone package in Debian, since I do not
On 13/05/06, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 13 May 2006 10:33:29 +0200, Tomas Fasth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:tomfado ... I have been busy recovering from a minor stroke.Oh man, I'm sorry to hear you had such an experience!Are you wellnow,
On 4/18/06, Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After fixing these minor issues, the NMU package would be suitable for
uploading. Would anyone like to first test it out?
I've posted my monotone 0.25-0.1 packages:
http://people.debian.org/~sjackman/debian/pool/main/m/monotone/
I've
On 4/17/06, Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
* The package built fine using debuild the first time, but the second
time was missing monotone.html. I don't know why. Very strange.
* monotone --version reports (base revision: unknown), which should be
fixed before uploading.
Both
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:57:50 -0600, Shaun
Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
sjackman On 4/17/06, Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sjackman ...
sjackman * The package built fine using debuild the first time, but
sjackmanthe second time was missing
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:20:10PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
sjackman package_full_revision_dist.txt
sjackman package_full_revision.c
sjackman package_revision.txt
sjackman package_revision.c
There were changes recently in how these were created and handled,
especially wrt.
Hello Richard,
I prepared a non-maintainer upload (NMU) of monotone 0.25, just to see
if there was any major issue standing in the way. My changelog follows
this mail. The package builds fine, and after some very casual
checking, appears to run fine as well. I need to make a couple minor
changes: