Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Not to mention that the trunk would regularly disappear every time
> someone pulled in trunk changes to a branch.
Heh... yeah that would be more than a bit annoying.
Cheers,
Derek
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 06:20:51PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 17:04 -0600, Derek Scherger wrote:
> > Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> > > Here's a list of all nvm* branches, by whether they've been merged into
> > > some other branch and the date on the latest head. I'd thi
On 20/08/2007, at 9:26 AM, William Uther wrote:
Having said that. Thanks everyone for the feedback. That will
help me get it closer to right the first time. I'm not planning to
do this for about a week to give lurkers time to chime in.
Hi all,
I went through the list of branches, and
On 19/08/2007, at 11:34 PM, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 21:05 +1000, William Uther wrote:
Hi all,
Now that the suspend branch is merged, I thought it might be time
to think about suspending some of these old branches we have lying
about. My first thought was suspend a
On 20/08/2007, at 9:04 AM, Derek Scherger wrote:
Timothy Brownawell wrote:
Here's a list of all nvm* branches, by whether they've been merged
into
some other branch and the date on the latest head. I'd think that we
could also suspend most of the 'M' ones from this year.
I was just wonderi
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 17:04 -0600, Derek Scherger wrote:
> Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> > Here's a list of all nvm* branches, by whether they've been merged into
> > some other branch and the date on the latest head. I'd think that we
> > could also suspend most of the 'M' ones from this year.
>
>
Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> Here's a list of all nvm* branches, by whether they've been merged into
> some other branch and the date on the latest head. I'd think that we
> could also suspend most of the 'M' ones from this year.
I was just wondering whether we could "suspend" these without actuall
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 21:35 +0200, Richard Levitte wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:08:37 -0500, Timothy
> Brownawell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> tbrownaw> On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 14:45 -0400, Nicolas Ruiz wrote:
> tbrownaw> > Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> tbrownaw> >
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:08:37 -0500, Timothy
Brownawell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
tbrownaw> On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 14:45 -0400, Nicolas Ruiz wrote:
tbrownaw> > Timothy Brownawell wrote:
tbrownaw> > > On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 21:05 +1000, William Uther wrote:
tbrownaw> >
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:44:07 -0700, "Zack
Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
zackw> On 8/19/07, William Uther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
zackw> > net.venge.monotone.debian
zackw>
zackw> Superseded by nvm.debian-diff (we're still working out how it's
zackw> going t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 19 Aug 2007 04:41:59 -0700, Nathaniel
Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
njs> On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 09:05:21PM +1000, William Uther wrote:
njs> > net.venge.monotone.levitte.cvs_import
njs> > net.venge.monotone.levitte.cvsserver
njs> > net.venge.monotone.levi
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 14:45 -0400, Nicolas Ruiz wrote:
> Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 21:05 +1000, William Uther wrote:
> >> net.venge.monotone.contrib.usher
> >
> > I think there are people using this, and I'm not aware of any
> > replacements.
>
> I'm using usher, but is
Timothy Brownawell wrote:
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 21:05 +1000, William Uther wrote:
net.venge.monotone.contrib.usher
I think there are people using this, and I'm not aware of any
replacements.
I'm using usher, but is included in the main trunk.
nicolás
On 8/19/07, William Uther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The point of this email is to speak now if you don't want any of
> these suspended.
[...]
> net.venge.monotone.debian
Superseded by nvm.debian-diff (we're still working out how it's going
to work, but that's the idea).
> net.venge.monoto
Timothy Brownawell schrieb:
> M 2007-04-25T09:29:47 net.venge.monotone.guitone.releases.0_6
Whatever you do, please leave the nvm.guitone* ones alone.
I'll take care of them on my own. ;)
Thomas.
--
only dead fish swim with the stream: http://thomaskeller.biz/blog
Am Anfang war das Wort: http:
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 21:05 +1000, William Uther wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>Now that the suspend branch is merged, I thought it might be time
> to think about suspending some of these old branches we have lying
> about. My first thought was suspend anything that hasn't been
> touched this year
On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 21:05 +1000, William Uther wrote:
> net.venge.monotone.contrib.usher
I think there are people using this, and I'm not aware of any
replacements.
--
Timothy
Free (experimental) public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net
__
On Aug 19, 2007, at 1:05 PM, William Uther wrote:
Hi all,
Now that the suspend branch is merged, I thought it might be time
to think about suspending some of these old branches we have lying
about. My first thought was suspend anything that hasn't been
touched this year. I gave the li
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 09:05:21PM +1000, William Uther wrote:
> net.venge.monotone.cshore.attr-scan
This hasn't been merged back yet, has it? IIRC there is good work in
here that still needs to be finished, is all.
> net.venge.monotone.cvssync
> net.venge.monotone.rewrites.cvs_import
What *are
Hi all,
Now that the suspend branch is merged, I thought it might be time
to think about suspending some of these old branches we have lying
about. My first thought was suspend anything that hasn't been
touched this year. I gave the list a quick once-over, but I might
have missed some
20 matches
Mail list logo
