Re: [Monotone-devel] Translations revisited

2007-03-11 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 09:48:33PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote: Hum, does intltool really do anything for us? Why not just use xgettext directly, with the existing list of source files in the Makefile? (Killing off POTFILES.in as well, yes.) We don't run intltool, it's part of a translator

Re: [Monotone-devel] Translations revisited

2007-03-11 Thread Nicolas Ruiz
Nathaniel Smith wrote: We don't run intltool, it's part of a translator tool suite. I guess I don't know for sure if any of our translators use it now, but at least one did at some point. I'm using KBabel, will take a look at poedit. nicolás ___

Re: [Monotone-devel] Translations revisited

2007-03-11 Thread Patrick Georgi
Zack Weinberg schrieb: essay Recursive Make Considered Harmful [ http://www.pcug.org.au/~millerp/rmch/recu-make-cons-harm.html ] for rationale. You're right - it's a matter of reuse, but I can probably get that even better with some more autoconf scripting, too (eg. have

[Monotone-devel] Translations revisited

2007-03-10 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Hi, I'm looking at the translations done until now, and this is what I get: cd po rm *.gmo make monotone.pot-update ... make MSGMERGE=msgmerge 'MSGMERGE_UPDATE=/usr/bin/msgmerge --update' rm -f fr.gmo /usr/X11R6/bin/msgfmt -c --statistics -o

Re: [Monotone-devel] Translations revisited

2007-03-10 Thread Patrick Georgi
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker schrieb: I'm looking at the translations done until now, and this is what I get: I'm currently looking at what functionality the Makefile in po/ has to provide for devs (besides .po - .gmo/.mo parsing), because I intend to remove the dependency on gnu gettext

Re: [Monotone-devel] Translations revisited

2007-03-10 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 3/10/07, Patrick Georgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm currently looking at what functionality the Makefile in po/ has to provide for devs (besides .po - .gmo/.mo parsing), because I intend to remove the dependency on gnu gettext there. Currently, the Makefile in po/ is created by autopoint, a

Re: [Monotone-devel] Translations revisited

2007-03-10 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 05:49:49PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote: Also, please do not bother preserving Makevars, LINGUAS, or any other such construct that is not actually necessary. In my ideal world, merely adding a .po file to the subdirectory would suffice to get it compiled to .(g)mo and

Re: [Monotone-devel] Translations revisited

2007-03-10 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 3/10/07, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We should preserve one part of Makevars -- we need some special options to xgettext (to tell it that strings passed to P(), etc., are translation candidates). See the giant comment on the XGETTEXT_OPTIONS variable in Makevars for the