Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.stripped failing check for lua

2008-10-14 Thread Jack Lloyd
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:54:40AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: > Aside to Jack Lloyd: It would be nice if botan provided a .pc file as > well as the botan-config executable. OK. Would it make sense to name the pkg-config based on the major and minor versions? pkg-config botan-1.7 --libs pkg-confi

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.stripped failing check for lua

2008-10-14 Thread Zack Weinberg
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I remember writing a bunch of m4 to deal with [varying names of .pc files] > but it > doesn't seem to be on this computer; I'll look on the other one tomorrow. Found it. The attached file goes in the m4/ directory, and i

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.stripped failing check for lua

2008-10-14 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, Alex Sandro Queiroz e Silva wrote: > The Lua authors have had no problems with breaking API and ABI > compatibility with each new version so far. So programs usually work > with just one version of Lua only. Between 5.0 and 5.1, yes. But I've so far thought that 5.1.x are bugfix releases

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.stripped failing check for lua

2008-10-14 Thread Alex Sandro Queiroz e Silva
Hallo, Richard Levitte wrote: > > Yes. However, it seems like some packages make the library version > part of the library *name*, to make sure that you link against exactly > that version and none else. > > Why they do so for lua, I've no idea... > The Lua authors have had no problems w

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.stripped failing check for lua

2008-10-13 Thread Brian May
Richard Levitte wrote: Yes. However, it seems like some packages make the library version part of the library *name*, to make sure that you link against exactly that version and none else. In general, this is a real pain in Debian, it means any updates to the library may require all clients

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.stripped failing check for lua

2008-10-13 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:06:59 -0600, "Derek Scherger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: derek> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: derek> derek> > Debian: derek> > derek> > $ (cd /usr/lib && ls -l liblua*) derek> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root r

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.stripped failing check for lua

2008-10-13 Thread Zack Weinberg
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Derek Scherger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2008-04-01 11:39 liblua5.1.so -> >> liblua5.1.so.0.0.0 >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2008-03-31 07:09 liblu

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.stripped failing check for lua

2008-10-13 Thread Derek Scherger
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Debian: > > $ (cd /usr/lib && ls -l liblua*) > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 324860 2008-01-26 08:12 liblua5.1.a > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root825 2008-01-26 08:12 liblua5.1.la > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2008-04-01 11:39 libl

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.stripped failing check for lua

2008-10-13 Thread Zack Weinberg
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Derek Scherger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LUA], [lua5.1], > + PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LUA], [lua], > > Is this a reasonable change on other systems? Debian: $ (cd /usr/lib && ls -l liblua*) -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 324860 2008-01-26 08:12 l

[Monotone-devel] nvm.stripped failing check for lua

2008-10-13 Thread Derek Scherger
On my system (gentoo) the pkg-config check for lua fails with: checking for LUA... no checking for lua 5.1... no; guessing checking for lua_load in -llua5.1... no checking whether the lua library is usable... yes Applying the following patch to patch m4/lua.m4 seems to make it happy: # # old_rev