On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:54:40AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Aside to Jack Lloyd: It would be nice if botan provided a .pc file as
> well as the botan-config executable.
OK. Would it make sense to name the pkg-config based on the major and
minor versions?
pkg-config botan-1.7 --libs
pkg-confi
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I remember writing a bunch of m4 to deal with [varying names of .pc files]
> but it
> doesn't seem to be on this computer; I'll look on the other one tomorrow.
Found it. The attached file goes in the m4/ directory, and i
Hi,
Alex Sandro Queiroz e Silva wrote:
> The Lua authors have had no problems with breaking API and ABI
> compatibility with each new version so far. So programs usually work
> with just one version of Lua only.
Between 5.0 and 5.1, yes. But I've so far thought that 5.1.x are bugfix
releases
Hallo,
Richard Levitte wrote:
>
> Yes. However, it seems like some packages make the library version
> part of the library *name*, to make sure that you link against exactly
> that version and none else.
>
> Why they do so for lua, I've no idea...
>
The Lua authors have had no problems w
Richard Levitte wrote:
Yes. However, it seems like some packages make the library version
part of the library *name*, to make sure that you link against exactly
that version and none else.
In general, this is a real pain in Debian, it means any updates to the
library may require all clients
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:06:59 -0600, "Derek
Scherger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
derek> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
derek>
derek> > Debian:
derek> >
derek> > $ (cd /usr/lib && ls -l liblua*)
derek> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root r
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Derek Scherger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2008-04-01 11:39 liblua5.1.so ->
>> liblua5.1.so.0.0.0
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2008-03-31 07:09 liblu
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Debian:
>
> $ (cd /usr/lib && ls -l liblua*)
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 324860 2008-01-26 08:12 liblua5.1.a
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root825 2008-01-26 08:12 liblua5.1.la
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 2008-04-01 11:39 libl
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Derek Scherger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LUA], [lua5.1],
> + PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LUA], [lua],
>
> Is this a reasonable change on other systems?
Debian:
$ (cd /usr/lib && ls -l liblua*)
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 324860 2008-01-26 08:12 l
On my system (gentoo) the pkg-config check for lua fails with:
checking for LUA... no
checking for lua 5.1... no; guessing
checking for lua_load in -llua5.1... no
checking whether the lua library is usable... yes
Applying the following patch to patch m4/lua.m4 seems to make it happy:
#
# old_rev
10 matches
Mail list logo