On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 03:29:59AM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> Eh, it's not a horribly big deal. Just a one-time bandwidth use of 6-7
> MB, and then a few MB increase in db size. Nothing's actually broken.
>
> Wouldn't having to send and remember cert allergies take just as much
> space?
Eh
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 01:15 -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Right, so, here's the appropriate recipe:
> $ mtn -d db execute \
> "delete from revision_certs where keypair = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
>
> It's been run on the server, if you pulled the extra certs, please
> make sure you run this co
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 12:36:24AM -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 09:54:38AM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> > Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> > > A number of old revisions now have two sets of certs, one by
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the certs you already had) and one by
> > > [EMA
