Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.options

2010-07-20 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 07/20/2010 05:44 AM, Stephen Leake wrote: Timothy Brownawelltbrow...@prjek.net writes: On 07/18/2010 08:19 AM, Stephen Leake wrote: Tim, Just letting you know I've been keeping up with nvm.options, and it all looks very good so far. I think it's ready to merge now. See anything I

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.options

2010-07-25 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 07/21/2010 05:25 PM, Thomas Keller wrote: Am 21.07.10 01:10, schrieb Thomas Keller: Am 20.07.10 04:58, schrieb Timothy Brownawell: On 07/18/2010 08:19 AM, Stephen Leake wrote: Tim, Just letting you know I've been keeping up with nvm.options, and it all looks very good so far. I think

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.options

2010-07-26 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 07/26/2010 09:14 AM, Thomas Keller wrote: I've talked with Thomas Moschny and he asked on ##c++ for a proper solution of the problem. The answers were mainly to replace all custom type specializations with real types, i.e. basically what I did above, so u32, u64, size_t and all the others

Re: [Monotone-devel] Unit test fail with SQLite 3.7

2010-07-31 Thread Timothy Brownawell
. -- Revision: 78f4db157a353de19b33df875959efc2492812b4 Parent: c36b63fe53580cdf51cd5c6afa42fc4a30a1d095 Author: Timothy Brownawell tbrow...@prjek.net Date: 07/27/2010 09:28:25 PM Branch: net.venge.monotone Changelog

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.options

2010-08-08 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 07/23/2010 03:42 AM, Stephen Leake wrote: should we hide --min/max-netsync-version? Sounds like a good idea, I've added that. -- Timothy Free public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net ___ Monotone-devel mailing list

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.options

2010-08-08 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 07/21/2010 06:15 PM, Thomas Keller wrote: Am 21.07.10 01:10, schrieb Thomas Keller: If the compilation issue is fixed, I'll check the UI again and may come up with other little things :) Some more observations: - --verbosity changes the level between -2 and 1 (default is 0) - but I

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.options

2010-08-08 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 07/20/2010 06:10 PM, Thomas Keller wrote: I wished that you'd have commented a few places a bit more though for us other devs so we properly use the new / changed macros (CMD_PRESET_OPTIONS is not mentioned f.e.) and have an idea what certain code paths do (just out of my head here, the

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.options

2010-08-08 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 07/21/2010 05:18 AM, Stephen Leake wrote: The options no-unknown/unknown are defined twice - once as SIMPLE_OPTION(unknown ...) once as OPTSET_REL(automate_inventory_opts, no_unknown) SIMPLE_OPTION(no_unknown ...) That seems like it could be a problem, but it seems to work. Yeah...

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.options

2010-08-10 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 08/09/2010 06:28 PM, Thomas Keller wrote: - If I increase the verbosity to 2 or set --verbosity=2, the --debug output is shown (which is reasonable, but not yet documented in the option text) Whats up with that? Now that --verbosity=1 has no effect on the above mentioned commands

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.options

2010-08-10 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 08/10/2010 07:03 AM, Thomas Keller wrote: Am 10.08.2010 13:51, schrieb Timothy Brownawell: On 08/09/2010 06:28 PM, Thomas Keller wrote: - If I increase the verbosity to 2 or set --verbosity=2, the --debug output is shown (which is reasonable, but not yet documented in the option

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.options

2010-08-14 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 08/10/2010 12:31 PM, Derek Scherger wrote: Sorry, I've been away and I'm late to the party on this but I'm not sure I like the --verbosity, --quiet, --debug and --reallyquiet options all that much. What about this as an alternative: - default verbosity is 0 as described above - verbosity

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.options

2010-08-14 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 08/14/2010 07:06 PM, Stephen Leake wrote: Timothy Brownawelltbrow...@prjek.net writes: On 08/10/2010 12:31 PM, Derek Scherger wrote: Sorry, I've been away and I'm late to the party on this but I'm not sure I like the --verbosity, --quiet, --debug and --reallyquiet options all that much.

[Monotone-devel] mtn:// URIs

2010-08-29 Thread Timothy Brownawell
Short version: I'd like to use ';' as a URI argument separator, and error out if both a query parameter and a separate include pattern are given. Are there any objections to this? $ mtn sy mtn://mtn-host.prjek.net/webohst?'net.venge.monotone.{viewmtn,contrib.{webhost,usher}}*' mtn: misuse:

Re: [Monotone-devel] mtn:// URIs

2010-08-30 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 08/30/2010 03:09 AM, Richard Levitte wrote: Another way to handle it is to expand the pattern early into an array of strings using globish and teaching monotone to handle that. That would work better if we didn't have the first-position argument mean something different than later

Re: [Monotone-devel] mtn:// URIs

2010-08-30 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 08/30/2010 08:34 AM, Richard Levitte wrote: Hmmm, it seems we're reaching an unhealthy level of complexity regarding this... Maybe it's time to invoke the KISS principle and rethink? Erroring out when given both query parameters and separate include arguments seems like it should be

Re: [Monotone-devel] tracking upstream

2010-09-21 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 09/20/2010 07:23 PM, Brian May wrote: Hello, I asked a similar question on my local mailing list concerning git. Just wondered what perspective I would get here, in particular with monotone people. I think similar issues apply in both cases. Lets say I am tracking an upstream project. As I

Re: [Monotone-devel] automate serve?

2010-09-26 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 09/26/2010 09:36 AM, Stephen Leake wrote: In implementing the DVC front-end for automate sync, I've run into a problem. If I use ssh: or file: netsync schemes, the mtn process that is started outputs startup error messages that are not properly packetized for automate stdio. For example, if

Re: [Monotone-devel] Please review nvm.automate_get_roster

2010-10-06 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 10/04/2010 07:32 AM, Thomas Keller wrote: Please review the above branch. The branch name has not so much in common with the actual implementation anymore, though: * a new file_sizes table has been added which records the size in bytes of individual files * two new automate commands have

Re: [Monotone-devel] Project separation

2010-10-07 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 10/07/2010 04:45 AM, Thomas Keller wrote: Hi all! I already brought up the idea on IRC some time ago - I am looking for a way to restrict allowed incoming revisions on the server-side. No, I don't plan to go towards the complexity of policy branches, which Tim is working on for quite some

Re: [Monotone-devel] Issues with mtn://

2010-10-10 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 10/10/2010 08:20 AM, Lapo Luchini wrote: I've seen this in 0.40, but I still have issues in 0.48 (on FreeBSD): % LANG=C mtn version monotone 0.48 (base revision: 844268c137aaa783aa800a9c16ae61edda80ecea) % LANG=C mtn pull 'mtn://code.monotone.ca/monotone?*' mtn: setting default include

[Monotone-devel] monotone.ca sync patterns

2010-10-16 Thread Timothy Brownawell
With the new splitted server databases, the 'monotone' and 'contrib' servers need some rather involved sync patterns if you're going to be syncing everything to the same local database. The below patterns should work if you start with a fresh database, otherwise there are several additional things

[Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)

2010-11-05 Thread Timothy Brownawell
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as usher-0.99 available from mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher and there is a tarball available at http://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz . It works on at least Debian and FreeBSD.

Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)

2010-11-09 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 11/08/2010 01:49 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as usher-0.99 available from mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher and there is a tarball available

Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)

2010-11-09 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 11/08/2010 01:04 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as usher-0.99 available from mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher and there is a tarball available

Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)

2010-11-09 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 11/08/2010 12:36 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: Well, I did download the tarball, http://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz and untarred it. The README file says The documentation is in doc/documentation.html. But there is no doc directory to be found in the

Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)

2010-11-10 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 11/09/2010 10:31 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 08:50:26PM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote: On 11/08/2010 01:49 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged

Re: Release rules Was: Re: [Monotone-devel] conflicts store vs show_conflicts

2010-11-22 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 11/22/2010 07:23 AM, Thomas Keller wrote: We already append a suffix dev to development snapshots (i.e. 1.0dev) which get created on build farms like openSUSE's build service. Thomas Moschny said that this is suboptimal because of rpm's version comparison algorithms which would consider

Re: Release rules Was: Re: [Monotone-devel] conflicts store vs show_conflicts

2010-11-22 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 11/22/2010 09:43 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote: This if we add ~dev7 to version number 1.1, we'll get version 1.1~dev7, which will sort before version 1.1 This sounds like the numbering system we're looking for. Of course, this isn't the *entire* comparison alrorithm. There's also an epoch and a

Re: Release rules Was: Re: [Monotone-devel] conflicts store vs show_conflicts

2010-11-22 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 11/22/2010 10:48 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:46:49PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 05:28:23PM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote: On 11/22/2010 09:43 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote: This if we add ~dev7 to version number 1.1, we'll get version 1.1~dev7

Re: Release rules Was: Re: [Monotone-devel] conflicts store vs show_conflicts

2010-11-23 Thread Timothy Brownawell
: tbrownawOn Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 05:28:23PM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote: tbrownawOn 11/22/2010 09:43 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote: tbrownawThis if we add ~dev7 to version number 1.1, we'll get version tbrownaw1.1~dev7, tbrownawwhich will sort before version 1.1 tbrownaw tbrownaw

Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of 0.99

2010-11-27 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 11/19/2010 04:31 AM, Markus Wanner wrote: Hi, I've recently upgraded to monotone 0.99, mainly to get the new commit message editor. Thanks for that! However, it seems to me it's quite a bit slower than previous versions. Which weren't exactly fast, either, but 'mtn status' and 'mtn ls

Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of 0.99

2010-11-28 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 11/27/2010 10:55 PM, Timothy Brownawell wrote: On 11/19/2010 04:31 AM, Markus Wanner wrote: Hi, I've recently upgraded to monotone 0.99, mainly to get the new commit message editor. Thanks for that! However, it seems to me it's quite a bit slower than previous versions. Which weren't

Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of 0.99

2010-11-29 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 11/29/2010 05:10 AM, Markus Wanner wrote: On 11/28/2010 07:55 PM, Timothy Brownawell wrote: Do we mind having an index-only schema change between 0.99 and 1.0? It sounds like we'd get a noticeably better user experience... I'd certainly appreciate it, but maybe someone who values the 1.0

Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of 0.99

2010-11-29 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 11/29/2010 01:05 PM, Markus Wanner wrote: Each revision typically has 4 certs (author, branch, date, changelog), so the old index on only rev_id should usually give 5 lookups. Indexing on (rev_id, name, value) should usually give 2 lookups, and indexing on everything gives 1 lookup. ..at

Re: [Monotone-devel] A Few Quick Questions...

2010-12-04 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 12/04/2010 06:27 AM, CooSoft Support wrote: Firstly if I want to update the wiki exactly what db do I use and branch, I can't find anything to do with wikis in any database that I can browse... Also if I don't have write access to it can I be granted write access please. It's a proper

[Monotone-devel] nvm.visualc branch

2010-12-22 Thread Timothy Brownawell
The net.venge.monotone.visualc branch builds and passes the tests on MinGW and *nix. With Visual Studio it passes the tests except for 3 i18n failures. Do we want to merge this now (and have 1.0 be buildable on VS2010) or wait for after the release? The changes are largely: * I built

Re: [Monotone-devel] use case for :memory: database?

2011-01-08 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 01/08/2011 05:02 PM, Thomas Keller wrote: Am 08.01.11 17:29, schrieb Stephen Leake: I'm adding a description of the global options to monotone.texi. What is the use case for :memory: database? One is for example that it gives you a throw-away database for remote automate actions: If you

Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions

2011-01-08 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 01/08/2011 06:19 PM, Stephen Leake wrote: Correct. But it would be nice to document how the executables on our download page are built. In fact, that's a requirement of the GPL 3 license Some of our downloads like the Windows installer bundle the libraries we use. So for any copyleft

Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions

2011-01-09 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 01/09/2011 04:16 AM, Stephen Leake wrote: Timothy Brownawell tbrow...@prjek.net writes: (which we should upgrade to). Eww. Can you elaborate? GPL 3 is technically more sophisticated than GPL 2. Mostly I'm annoyed at the change from straight copyleft to forbidding it from being used

Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.source-tree-cleanup

2011-01-30 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 01/30/2011 05:08 PM, Thomas Keller wrote: Hi all! Richard, Stephe and me polished the above branch over the last weeks and got positive response from a couple of people that it works well for them. For those who weren't following the previous development, this branch is basically about

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [Monotone-commits-diffs] net.venge.monotone.source-tree-cleanup: d54c8c17eeebbe7dd6bb30d4d10996db79de24f2

2011-01-31 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 01/31/2011 07:36 PM, Stephen Leake wrote: this gets back to the question I asked: What Makefile targets are supposed to work? I tested monotone.pdf, but not monotone.ps. Is there some other target that builds monotone.ps? 'dist' apparently doesn't. What other targets do I need to

Re: [Monotone-devel] colorization

2015-04-19 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 04/13/2015 03:02 AM, Markus Wanner wrote: That's a use case. Have --pager be a GUI program (notepad, whatever), which doesn't output thru your terminal. In which case you probably want it *especially* if your terminal isn't smart. Such a program would need to be able to read from stdin, but

Re: [Monotone-devel] colorization

2015-04-12 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 04/09/2015 01:23 PM, Markus Wanner wrote: Hi, On 03/30/2015 08:48 PM, Markus Wanner wrote: To argue a bit more objectively: I tried to make the default colors readable on black as well as white background. And I reduced noise a bit by un-coloring a couple of things. Colorization can be

Re: [Monotone-devel] colorization

2015-04-12 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 04/12/2015 01:59 PM, Markus Wanner wrote: Other colorized commands will output the colorization codes if specifically asked, even to pipes. That in turn surprises me. $ mtn diff --colorize | cat gives monochrome output for me. What specific command and OS do you use? Oops, I meant

[Monotone-devel] mtn-host.prjek.net going away

2015-10-15 Thread Timothy Brownawell
mtn-host.prjek.net has been unmaintained for far too long, and is almost unused (no more than 5 projects touched this year). I'll be making it read-only in mid-November, and then taking it the rest of the way down at the end of the year. ___

Re: [Monotone-devel] usher documentation

2015-11-30 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 11/27/2015 07:03 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote: I'm specfically looking to find out how to get usher to reread the configuration file. It tries to be a good Unix daemon, and catches SIGHUP for this. There's also a command thru usherctl. Either it didn't work, or I don't know how to SUGHUP. I

Re: [Monotone-devel] usher documentation

2015-11-21 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 11/21/2015 07:47 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: Where does usher documentation hide out now? It's in doc/documentation.html . I don't know that this is available online anywhere other than thru viewmtn. I'm specfically looking to fine out how to get usher to reread the configuration file. It

Re: [Monotone-devel] permissions

2016-01-21 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 19:25 -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote: > In all the examples I've seen, in the read permissions file I get to  > use a pattern to specify which branches users are allowed to read.  > > But there seems to be no such pattern in the write permissions file. > > Is there a reason for

<    1   2   3   4   5   6