http://github.com/gfx/moose/commits/topic/strict-constructor2
I have implemented use Moose -strict command. How about it?
--
Goro Fuji (藤 吾郎)
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, Goro Fuji wrote:
http://github.com/gfx/moose/commits/topic/strict-constructor2
I have implemented use Moose -strict command. How about it?
I really wish you'd use the Moose repo like everyone else. It makes it a
lot easier for me to review your code that way, and
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 15:21, Dave Rolsky auta...@urth.org wrote:
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, Goro Fuji wrote:
http://github.com/gfx/moose/commits/topic/strict-constructor2
I have implemented use Moose -strict command. How about it?
I really wish you'd use the Moose repo like everyone else. It
Hello,
Use Moose -strict looks very unusual. Why not something more usual for Perl
like use Moose::Strict?
-Original Message-
From: Goro Fuji [mailto:g.psy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 10:47 AM
To: Dave Rolsky; Moose ML
Subject: Re: A branch to review:
Dave:
I really wish you'd use the Moose repo like everyone else. It makes it
a lot easier for me to review your code that way, and probably for
others who aren't too git-savvy.
Oh, sorry. I forked it from force of habit.
Well, let's get back to the subject.
Although I implemented the
Excerpts from Goro Fuji's message of Sun Feb 28 21:09:29 -0500 2010:
Dave said that constructor strictness should not be tied to immutability, but
I don't think so. This is because existing options to make_immutable, namely
constructor_name and inline_construcotr, etc., are irrelevant to
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 02:35, Hans Dieter Pearcey h...@pobox.com wrote:
I have to side with Dave on this one.
Yeah on one hand the -import() namespace is being polluted and on the
other hand meta-make_immutable() is being used to do something not
relating to immutability.
If it's going to be
