Re: Shlomif's Tenth Law of Perl OOP and Test-Run

2008-05-09 Thread Stevan Little
Shlomi, On May 9, 2008, at 12:03 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote: Shlomif's Tenth Law of Perl OOP: "Every sufficiently complex Class::Accessor program contains contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug- ridden, slow implementation of half of Moose." Very nice, I like that quote, if you don't mind I

Re: Shlomif's Tenth Law of Perl OOP and Test-Run

2008-05-08 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Stevan! On Friday 09 May 2008, Stevan Little wrote: > Shlomi, > > On May 8, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > Shlomif's Tenth Law of Perl OOP: "Every sufficiently complex > > Class::Accessor > > program contains contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug- > > ridden, s

Re: Shlomif's Tenth Law of Perl OOP and Test-Run

2008-05-08 Thread Stevan Little
Shlomi, On May 8, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote: Hi all! Shlomif's Tenth Law of Perl OOP: "Every sufficiently complex Class::Accessor program contains contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug- ridden, slow implementation of half of Moose." Very nice, I like that quote, if you d

Shlomif's Tenth Law of Perl OOP and Test-Run

2008-05-08 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi all! Shlomif's Tenth Law of Perl OOP: "Every sufficiently complex Class::Accessor program contains contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Moose." (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenspun's_Tenth_Rule ). I used Class::Accessor for Test-Run ( s