> A hack indeed, but far more practical and intuitive.
Eh, maybe the results are what people have gotten used to but it's the
opposite of the spec, exactly the kind of thing IE gets torn to shreds
over... screws up custom onblur handlers, by Moz's own admission.
You can do the same thing in
A hack indeed, but far more practical and intuitive.
On Dec 29, 2010, at 8:29 PM, Sanford Whiteman
wrote:
In fact, Mozilla
> fires a fake blur (in native code) in order to "excuse" firing the
> change while still claiming compliance. IMO, this is a hack whether
> it occurs in compiled co
> I just found it interesting that the input boxes change event does
> not fire when it's checked state is changed (as the name would tend
> to suggest)...
DOM 2 change specifically occurs "when a control loses the input focus
andits value has been modified since gaining focu
Now that I have some time I will explain the problem in greater detail, it was
my fault that I was not clear when I started this thread.
In my first example (http://jsfiddle.net/CBcFn/) the class of the div did not
change when the button was pressed, this was merely for illustration. The
actua
Great idea using a fireEvent, I didn't even think of that I must be slipping in
my old age.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: mootools-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:mootools-us...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:12 PM
To: Andraž Kos
> You really should use the "Moo way" of doing things. It will make things a
> lot easier in the long run when programs get more complex.
Your Moo-ified adjustment doesn't work in IE.
onChange doesn't fire in IE until the element is blurred. It's
possible to fire blur() manually, then
I think the around widget is pretty cool and the most useful.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Ciul wrote:
> Hey pals.
>
> Did you tried the widgets?
>
> Any opinion about them?
>
> I'd appreaciate opinions. My favorite one is the Around widget :P
>
> On 28 dic, 13:37, Ryan Florence wrote:
>
That's confusing indeed, better would be "Checks to see if an object is an
instance of a particular Type* or Class.*"
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:50 PM, stratboy wrote:
> Yes you're right, excuse me. I read 'Checks to see if an object is an
> instance of a particular Type.' and for some reason I
Yes you're right, excuse me. I read 'Checks to see if an object is an
instance of a particular Type.' and for some reason I thought that wth
Type (and not type) they intended some of the core mootools Types.
Thank you!
On 29 Dic, 14:35, Arian Stolwijk wrote:
> Example from the docs:http://moo
You really should use the "Moo way" of doing things. It will make things a
lot easier in the long run when programs get more complex.
http://jsfiddle.net/CBcFn/4/
Example from the docs:
http://mootools.net/docs/core/Core/Core#Core:instanceOf
var myClass = new Class();
var bar = new myClass();
instanceOf(bar, myClass) // returns true
So you could use instanceOf for your classes.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:30 PM, stratboy wrote:
> Hi! I want to check the
Hi! I want to check the type of a function argument. I want to be able
to say if it's an object instance of a custom class I made.
Do you know of any way? In ActionScript there's an 'is' method that I
can use.
Bye!
I try to make http://doc.jsfiddle.net/ as easy to read as possible
On 12/29/10 11:44, Ciul wrote:
> Any more tips?:D, I don't really know how jsFiddle works. What about
> how to use resources? I'd like to use xml files in some tests.
Resources in jsFiddle are CSS and JS files loaded from an exter
Italian locale with mac keyboard
//these are the keypad numbers
- problem! keydown:` |press:0
- problem! keydown:n |press:,
- no prob!:enter
- problem! keydown:a |press:1
- problem! keydown:b |press:2
- problem! keydown:c |press:3
- problem! keydown:d |press:4
- proble
Hey Arieh,
In the past I had to fixed this for numeric keyboard.
With Your code it works like this:
problem! keydown:g |press:7
problem! keydown:h |press:8
problem! keydown:i |press:9
problem! keydown:= |press:+
etc.
So - press is ok, keydown is not.
Same with polish diacritics:
problem! keydow
Thanks Piotr.
I still have lot of things to learn, I recently lernt Javascript and
then MooTools nearly since September by my own.
Any more tips?:D, I don't really know how jsFiddle works. What about
how to use resources? I'd like to use xml files in some tests.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Ciul.
On
Just a 2c about using jsFiddle.
The power of jsFiddle shows when using with [Set as Base]
That way you could simply click on [Set as Base] on my link or fix
something, [Update] it would save under /Ciul/3VVEn/3/
After hitting [Set as Base] it would be linked from /Ciul/3VVEn/
On 12/29/10 03:21,
17 matches
Mail list logo
