Fun fact:
Results are from the top six TLD's (com, net, org, info, biz, us):
There are currently 139,114,551 domains
In the last day 105,759 domains expired
In the last day 103,787 were created
In the last day 117,261 were transferred
I'm sure that these numbers are not exact, in fact by the end
> just to learn: is there a possibillity to change only one part [ff] of
> the exsisting morph-object like i thought in the beginning.
> .start({
> ff: [0],
> 'opacity': [0]
> });
> what we did for now is to create a complete new morph-object.
Dude, seriou
If you did that then you'll have a lib/bootstrap directory that has all my
js in it. If you want to add another repo, yes, you'll need to edit the
settings, but the easier thing to do is to fork my bootstrap repo and check
out your fork in lib/bootstrap.
(after installing)
$ cd mootools-developmen
Added some stuff already and started to write docs in your format.
https://github.com/DimitarChristoff/mootools-bootstrap/blob/master/Docs/UI/Bootstrap.Scrollspy.md
If this is to standard, I will finish it up and read up on behaviors and
what it does over the next day or so
Best regards
--
Di
On 26/03/2012 15:47, Aaron Newton wrote:
The specs for Behavior stuff are really easy to author. The test is
basically an HTML example that should instantiate your class and the
unit tester verifies that it does. You can then make additional assertions.
I'll grant that my testing environment has
The specs for Behavior stuff are really easy to author. The test is
basically an HTML example that should instantiate your class and the unit
tester verifies that it does. You can then make additional assertions.
I'll grant that my testing environment has grown a bit esoteric, but it is
at least e
@Dimitar, are you planning adding yours to Aaron's? Would be neat to
complete it.
I am currently working with Simon Smith on mootstrap-tabs as well - then
will see if I can actually sort it with a pull request as Aaron
suggested. The idea was is to unify my individual plugins under one repo
On 24/03/2012 01:00, Matthew Hazlett wrote:
Using it for a domain look-up via JavaScript is a great idea but, i'm
afraid this is unrealistic. To preform a look-up like you are proposing
would be best served with an indexed database (there are just too many
internet domains).
But I do agree it wo
just to learn: is there a possibillity to change only one part [ff] of
the exsisting morph-object like i thought in the beginning.
.start({
ff: [0],
'opacity': [0]
});
what we did for now is to create a complete new morph-object.
Yeah thats cool. There was just a lot of fluff in that other one.
From: Arian Stolwijk [mailto:stolwijk.ar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 26 March 2012 10:38 PM
To: mootools-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Moo] Re: morph.start(with variable) do not work
I don't think using JSON.decode
I don't think using JSON.decode for this is a very good practice.
This is a lot better: http://jsfiddle.net/H84d8/11/
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Steve Onnis wrote:
> Why couldn't you do it like this??
>
> http://jsfiddle.net/H84d8/10/
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: hamburger [
Why couldn't you do it like this??
http://jsfiddle.net/H84d8/10/
-Original Message-
From: hamburger [mailto:bilidi...@web.de]
Sent: Monday, 26 March 2012 10:17 PM
To: MooTools Users
Subject: [Moo] Re: morph.start(with variable) do not work
thx arian. I have it.
At one time in the fut
thx arian. I have it.
At one time in the future there will be one more great javascript-
programer ... I'am sure that's not me.
Adian, thanks for your help.
I also tried your proposal.
http://jsfiddle.net/H84d8/8/
may problem is to give the object ti the start-value.
http://jsfiddle.net/H84d8/9/
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:06 PM, hamburger wrote:
> I made a smaller jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/H84d8/7/
>
>
I made a smaller jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/H84d8/7/
no.
obj is the variable, you can't use it like:
var someString = 'asdf'
{obj[someString]: 'value'}
it should be:
var someString = 'asdf'
var myObject = {}
myObject[someString] = 'someValue'
It's basic JavaScript,
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript/Guide/Values,_Variables,_and_Literals
thx Arian,
i tried the following:
http://jsfiddle.net/H84d8/5/
result:
missing : after property id
sorry I do not get it.
Neat stuff, I avoided Bootstrap original just because of jQuery, but the
moo version especially with Behavior/Delegator the code is (to me anyway)
much cleaner.
I needed a delegator to hide a popup and that took about -1 minute to make
as it's basically copying Delegator.BS.ShowPopup.js to
Del
19 matches
Mail list logo
