Re: [MOPO] Going Potty for Harry

2008-10-22 Thread McDaniel Kirby
There are two of them, aren't there? K. On Oct 21, 2008, at 11:58 PM, Roger Kim wrote: I think it's because we Americans don't know what the bloomin' philosopher's stone is. -rk On Oct 21, 2008, at 9:47 PM, Phil Edwards wrote: and why did they change the title? Phil - Original Messa

Re: [MOPO] Going Potty for Harry

2008-10-21 Thread Roger Kim
I think it's because we Americans don't know what the bloomin' philosopher's stone is. -rk On Oct 21, 2008, at 9:47 PM, Phil Edwards wrote: and why did they change the title? Phil - Original Message - From: "Roger Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 2:33

Re: [MOPO] Going Potty for Harry

2008-10-21 Thread Ari Richards
SATAN! --- On Wed, 22/10/08, Phil Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Phil Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [MOPO] Going Potty for Harry > To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU > Received: Wednesday, 22 October, 2008, 3:47 PM > and why did th

Re: [MOPO] Going Potty for Harry

2008-10-21 Thread Phil Edwards
and why did they change the title? Phil - Original Message - From: "Roger Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 2:33 PM Subject: [MOPO] Film vs. Film The first Harry Potter film is unusual in that it not only has two different English language titles ("Harr