Re: [MOSAIC] wondering minds (addendum to my last post)

2007-05-25 Thread Barbara Punchak
Jan, *duhhh* I was so busy explaining what I did with my groups that I neglected to respond to your question. When students are responsible to "talk about the book" with their peers, they're more apt to read carefully---or use necessary "fix-up strategies" {fingers crossed} if and when it does oc

[MOSAIC] fluency

2007-05-25 Thread Laura Cannon
I use DIBELS as a tool to check how my kids are doing. We use DIBELS to screen for children who might need further testing for dyslexia. Our reading specialist used it as a quick screen, if serious shortcomings were noted then she did the more intensive testing that is very time consuming. In

Re: [MOSAIC] wondering minds

2007-05-25 Thread Barbara Punchak
I spent the last 2-1/2 weeks using book clubs with my middle schoolers, and every group in each of my reading classes was enthralled with the book they had chosen. You can do this using literature circle roles or reciprocal teaching roles--as long as students are familiar with how to question, int

Re: [MOSAIC] wAndering minds

2007-05-25 Thread write
Yes, I have them work on predictions and visualizing. They also do connections. I think the timer idea is a good one. I don't think they'll do that at home, though. I think I may be the only teacher in my building who teaches strategies. In the fall they really dislike the strategies. By

Re: [MOSAIC] Re-replies to my fluency v. comprehension

2007-05-25 Thread elaine garan
What I think honestly, is that DIBELS doesn't assess students as much as it trains them in an approach to text. I have all the independent research including Michael Pressley's study of DIBELS. I hate to even get into that because it's really controversial and controversy can be divisive.

Re: [MOSAIC] Re-replies to my fluency v. comprehension

2007-05-25 Thread Readinglady1
In a message dated 5/25/2007 10:42:45 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I totally agree with your definition of fluency-- that it must be inseparable from comprehension. However, I would note that assessments such as DIBELS and some fluency programs You are right abo

Re: [MOSAIC] Re-replies to my fluency v. comprehension

2007-05-25 Thread Joy
I haven't been posting much lately, I caught the flu, then got caught up in the EOY testing mania going on at my school ( the mania is something new for us ). I think I've been in a similar place as Bill these past few weeks. Testing will be over next Friday, so I'm seeing a light at the end of

Re: [MOSAIC] Re-replies to my fluency v. comprehension

2007-05-25 Thread ljackson
Cannot justify NOT holding them On 5/25/07 11:05 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In our district, the first grade benchmarks are set using nationally normed > data for reading recovery. The thought being > this,we cannot justify holding our students to the same level se

Re: [MOSAIC] Re-replies to my fluency v. comprehension

2007-05-25 Thread ljackson
In our district, the first grade benchmarks are set using nationally normed data for reading recovery. The thought being this,we cannot justify holding our students to the same level set by a national remmediation program. That is where our level 20 for first came from. It is our goal that 5

Re: [MOSAIC] Re-replies to my fluency v. comprehension

2007-05-25 Thread thomas
Elaine you're up north way right? I will look forward to maybe getting to meet and work with you in some way. Can't wait to read yournew book. sally On 5/25/07 10:00 AM, "elaine garan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I one hundred percent agree with you. I wish we could get the media and > pare

Re: [MOSAIC] Re-replies to my fluency v. comprehension

2007-05-25 Thread elaine garan
Actually, geographically, I'm right in the middle-- Fresno. I'd love to meet you and get together. On Friday, May 25, 2007, at 09:30 AM, thomas wrote: > Elaine you're up north way right? I will look forward to maybe > getting to > meet and work with you in some way. Can't wait to read yourn

Re: [MOSAIC] norm referenced tests

2007-05-25 Thread thomas
An alternative that may actually live again - if the movements against NCLB have any impact (they all call for multiple measures - and they usually mean authentic classroom assessment as part of a mm system) - is the Learning Record. You can read more about it on the Fair Test website. Heinemann

Re: [MOSAIC] Re-replies to my fluency v. comprehension

2007-05-25 Thread elaine garan
I one hundred percent agree with you. I wish we could get the media and parents to understand this too. To do that, we need to have the facts and the language to make the issues accessible to people who don't have the background or education to understand the issues or for media people who

Re: [MOSAIC] norm referenced tests

2007-05-25 Thread elaine garan
Ok-- two sources: Alfie Kohn's little book The Case Against Standardized Testing is an indispensable source for issues in testing. My book has a whole section explaining testing terminology and the whole testing process in language I think human beings can understand. If you are interested

[MOSAIC] norm referenced tests

2007-05-25 Thread Heather Blau
Elaine, I teach in New York City where school reform is being driven by data in excess. Our schools receive a letter grade (A, B, ...F) based on 85% norm reference tests (15% on parent and teacher surveys). I am a part of a group of parents gearing up to challenge the logic of weighing n

Re: [MOSAIC] Re-replies to my fluency v. comprehension

2007-05-25 Thread Renee
Thank you, Elaine. This is what I was getting at in my purposely obtuse way, hoping that people would think about it. I know that benchmarks are arbitrary, and I think grade levels are suspect as well. I think people need to remember and think about this when they are fretting over a child

Re: [MOSAIC] Re-replies to my fluency v. comprehension

2007-05-25 Thread elaine garan
I will tell you the truth. The benchmarks, what subject matter is important to test (in other words, the test questions) are decided by a bunch of people sitting around a desk somewhere-- some of whom never even taught-- As for grade level, I believe that's done statistically. That is, larg

Re: [MOSAIC] Re-replies to my fluency v. comprehension

2007-05-25 Thread elaine garan
I totally agree with your definition of fluency-- that it must be inseparable from comprehension. However, I would note that assessments such as DIBELS and some fluency programs define fluency as a surface skill in that it is about speed and automatic decoding that sometimes doesn't even i

Re: [MOSAIC] Re-replies to my fluency v. comprehension

2007-05-25 Thread Renee
On May 25, 2007, at 4:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 5/23/2007 10:27:39 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Who decides what "on grade level" actually means? > What is the measurement that determines whether or not a child is "on > grade level"?

Re: [MOSAIC] wondering minds

2007-05-25 Thread Mlredcon
Read Chris Tovani's book, I read it but I don't get it-filled with what you need to help kids monitor their reading. Maxine ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ___ Mosaic mailing list Mosaic@literacyworkshop

Re: [MOSAIC] Re-replies to my fluency v. comprehension

2007-05-25 Thread Readinglady1
In a message dated 5/23/2007 9:32:47 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: nsion. Unless children understand how to get at meaning through reading, unless they But I really think we are saying the same thing. I am saying that a "fluent" reader is a reader that "understa

Re: [MOSAIC] Re-replies to my fluency v. comprehension

2007-05-25 Thread Readinglady1
In a message dated 5/23/2007 10:27:39 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Who decides what "on grade level" actually means? What is the measurement that determines whether or not a child is "on grade level"? There are benchmarks for each grade level. These are used as