On 1/12/07 4:21 PM, "Joy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will send to this list tomorrow (I have to find it at work) a set of
> criteria that originates from IRA/NCTE sources/educators and which is
> probably more constructivist in its assumptions though ( or in fact a
> constructivist approac
Sally,
I am interested in this, because our school is in the middle of a long
reflective process in which we defined who we are and what we believe anddon't
believe about teaching. We have been working on this for a year, and are
continually modifying this as we progress. This document sounds
The materials for analyzing literacy materials that come from Oregon - as
these do - are based on a behaviorist, part to whole view of reading and
literacy. (and be certain in addition that they don't give any credence to
the importance of writing in general for its on sake or in support of
readin
We face this decision next year and hope to be much wiser this time. I
was given to resources at a seminar in December.
Florida Center for Reading Research http://www.fcrr.org
Oregon Reading First http://oregonreadingfirst.uoregon.edu
___
Mosaic ma
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
Sent: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:32 PM
Subject: [MOSAIC] basal reading series
I am working with a school district that is involved in the process
of
purchasing a new basal series. They would like to get one most closely
I am working with a school district that is involved in the process of
purchasing a new basal series. They would like to get one most closely
aligned with balanced literacy. Does anyone know of a checklist of
document that can be used for making this decision?
Thanks
Karen
Karen Giek, The Pr
