we don't have loads of old experiments we need to rerun but if you do, make
the change. It sounds reasonable.
On 12 May 2010 13:58, Christian Hardmeier wrote:
> Hi Hieu
>
> > chris - we can add a default=1 but talked to pwilliams about it, would
> > need to keep the back compatiblity in the mert
Hi Hieu
> chris - we can add a default=1 but talked to pwilliams about it, would
> need to keep the back compatiblity in the mert scripts & other places
> too. Would just be a source of constant bugs.
I just discussed the matter with my office mate Arianna. We would favour
the following solutio
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 22:54:20 Hieu Hoang wrote:
> there is a error message from the decoder.
> ERROR:Expected at least 5 tokens per entries in 'ttable-file', but
> only found 4
Hi Hieu
Yes, when I first saw that error message I was puzzled by it. I would suggest
something that explicitly
On 5/11/2010 17:54, Barry Haddow wrote:
> Hi Giuseppe
>
> The first error that you give is because the format of the moses.ini file has
> changed. You need to add an extra digit at the beginning of the line that
> specifies the ttable-file. Add 0 for a memory-based ttable, and 1 for a
> binarised t
there is a error message from the decoder.
ERROR:Expected at least 5 tokens per entries in 'ttable-file', but
only found 4
however, it's lost in all the credits and param explanation. So I've
moved those out of the way when there's an error so that we can see
message properly
chris - we ca
On 11 May 2010 17:33, Christian Hardmeier wrote:
> For my purposes, even a hard-coded assumption of 1, along with a more
> transparent error message if the model isn't found, would do. Does
> anybody actually decode with in-memory phrase tables in real life?
> (well, I suppose some people do...)
Maybe adding another option in moses would be an good idea, at least you
don't need to modify the ini files. Just modify the commands would be easier
i guess.
Best regards!
Jie Jiang
CNGL, School of Computing,
Dublin City University,
Glasnevin, Dublin 9.
Tel: +353 (0)1 700 6724
2010/5/11 Chri
For my purposes, even a hard-coded assumption of 1, along with a more
transparent error message if the model isn't found, would do. Does
anybody actually decode with in-memory phrase tables in real life?
(well, I suppose some people do...)
/Christian
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Barry Haddow wrote:
> Ma
Maybe a more transparent error message would help?
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 17:20:26 Hieu Hoang wrote:
> i thought about making it back-compatible but the code gets messy and
> error prone. Theres now 3 more phrase table - the text SCFG, binary
> SCFG, and the suffix array.
>
> So i thought it bett
i thought about making it back-compatible but the code gets messy and
error prone. Theres now 3 more phrase table - the text SCFG, binary
SCFG, and the suffix array.
So i thought it better to take the punch now and feel a short, sharp
pain rather than let it linger.
however, anyone wants to pu
Hi,
> The first error that you give is because the format of the moses.ini file has
> changed. You need to add an extra digit at the beginning of the line that
> specifies the ttable-file. Add 0 for a memory-based ttable, and 1 for a
> binarised ttable.
Is there a reason why we can't have back
Hi Giuseppe
The first error that you give is because the format of the moses.ini file has
changed. You need to add an extra digit at the beginning of the line that
specifies the ttable-file. Add 0 for a memory-based ttable, and 1 for a
binarised ttable.
The second error is from irstlm. Probabl
We are running into problems with the version of moses released on April
26th.
mosesmt fails when using tables prouced with a previous version:
Defined parameters (per moses.ini or switch):
config: moses.ini
distortion-file: 0-0 msd-bidirectional-fe 6
combinedBaseline/workdir/
13 matches
Mail list logo
