Ah, perfect. I somehow firmly believed this only works for the
non-syntactic hierarchical models. Thanks!
Best,
Marcin
W dniu 24.07.2013 15:19, Rico Sennrich pisze:
> Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt writes:
>
>> Hi list,
>> If I am not mistaken, there is currently no functionality to prune
>> tree-to-str
Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt writes:
>
> Hi list,
> If I am not mistaken, there is currently no functionality to prune
> tree-to-string rule tables. Do you think it makes sense to use filter-pt
> for hierarchical rules instead, for instance by replacing category
> symbols with the generic [X]. Afte
Actually my experience with significance pruning in case of phrase-based
models is usually very positive, also in terms of translation quality,
but maybe I just have messy corpora :)
I will see what I can cook up, if it proves useful I''l contribute.
Thanks Hieu,
Best,
Marcin
W dniu 24.07.2013
The tree-to-string model is faster for decoding, compared to hiero model,
and much faster compared to string-to-tree.
therefore, imo, you don't need to prune because pruning always causes
search errors.
if you mean filtering by input sentences to get rid of rules you know will
never apply (ie. no
