At 15:08 11/12/2000 +0800, lamb liu wrote:
My tarball is M18 and about 17M after unzip ,
where can I find the whole package?
why they don't put these files together in one package?
It is, unless its a binary distribution, i.e. a running version of Mozilla
rather than the source. Which do you
There's a significant amount of spam on these newsgroups. Is anyone
moderating them?
No, this is an unmoderated newsgroup.
Gerv
At 09:20 11/12/2000 +, Gervase Markham wrote:
1. Create some "catchy" additional newsgroups that are not intended to be
used as a development communications channel in the first place (e.g.
mozilla.bugs.browser, mozilla.bugs.mail-news).
2. Make them moderated by a robot that points
Sorry about the cryptic suject. The following works perfectly in IE 5.0
on Win98. However, I'm having the strangest problem with it on Mozilla
M18 on Linux.
To demonstrate:
http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~ddb/teaching/hume/enquiry/test.html
(The above works only in IE5, NN6)
Basically the above
Simon P. Lucy wrote:
In some ways it would be nice if the licence obligated the
distributor (where they maintained their own source location), to
support their own distribution and to document to mozilla.org the
location of their support channel.
I don't think this is a good idea.
Gervase Markham wrote:
1. Create some "catchy" additional newsgroups that are not intended to be
used as a development communications channel in the first place (e.g.
mozilla.bugs.browser, mozilla.bugs.mail-news).
2. Make them moderated by a robot that points new posters to an FAQ page.
Gervase Markham wrote:
They require keyboard shortcuts which are easy to use with one hand; but
that doesn't require a separate skin, and it improves usability for everybody.
Not necessarily, if the shortcuts are harder to remember as a result.
I agree with you about the other stuff.
Simon P. Lucy wrote:
If they change the distribution and provide a source link then they
should support it.
Why?
Say, with Beonex, I decided not to offer any support at all. I would
just put out the binaries and let people help themselves using whateven
channels they like - friends,
Jesse Ruderman wrote:
network links for windows are usually file:/
Thanks.
Regards,
Fredrick
Steve Henson wrote:
Netscape 6 does not support Internet standards in my opinion. If you
print a web page with an applet on it, the applet will not print. This
is a serious issue for E-Commerce sites that are powered by applets
that require customers to print receipts and tickets. Other
"D. D. Brierton" wrote:
I'm having the strangest problem with it on Mozilla
M18 on Linux.
[...]
(The above works only in IE5, NN6)
If it works with NS6 but not with M18, then it's likely a bug that has been
fixed after M18. Check out Mozilla 0.6, which is what NS6 is based on, or,
even
Hi!
I often browse websites and read newsgroups at the same time. If I
browse a site with a weird charset this also affects my writing of
newsgroup postings (lots of ? characters instead of special language
characters), and I therefore get flamed regularly :-)
Is this a setting I am missing, or
people to try out there ideas", I didn't mean in the default chrome!
Ouch! /there/their/. slaps wrist
Gerv
Gervase Markham wrote:
No. Because Newsgroups are a "pull" mechanism, you can't do something like
this. Hence the planned "auto-add-FAQ-URL" magic for some of the new
newsgroups.
Could we also do something inside the robo-moderator along the lines of
checking whether the poster has posted
Is Mozilla 0.6 timebombed to expire at some point, or can
it be used indefinitely? I'd like to deploy it to some users,
but only if it won't cease functioning after a short interval.
Thanks in advance.
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 16:38:30 +0100, Andreas Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is Mozilla so slow?
Good question. If you have a patch to make Mozilla faster, or a testcase that points
out bottlenecks in the code, please file a bug and add the "perf" keyword.
Andreas
You bet. Keep in
Stuart Ballard wrote:
Could we also do something inside the robo-moderator along the lines of
checking whether the poster has posted successfully once before, and if
so, allow the post unconditionally?
This adds additional complexity, but it may be possible. If this is
implemented, we will
Hi,
I have a problem with the following script:
--
HTML
HEAD
script language="JavaScript"
!--
function Show()
{
document.layers.test.visibility = "show"
};
function Hide()
{
document.layers.test.visibility = "hide"
};
// --
/SCRIPT
/HEAD
BODY
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
snip
I give up. I'll continue to test Mozilla (just downloaded and installed
0.6). (didn't see much improvement. No fix for the hiding of read
messages), reporting bugs.
0.6 doesn't have a single fix in it that you'll notice. 0.6 is a build
from the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Ben Bucksch) wrote:
IMO, the current situation doesn't help anybody.
Compared to withdrawing nightlies, the current situation is better for
people who in your categorization are considered "testers" and people
who have about the same skill
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Ben Bucksch) wrote:
Matthew Thomas wrote:
The only alternative I see is
to completely change the policy of mozilla.org.
Balderdash. People other than developers and testers are going to use
There's more than democracy going on here. Largely it comes down to
making a convincing case to the PTB.
Is that me? If so, what does it stand for? ;-)
hopes he didn't mean PHB
Gerv
Charlie Zender wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering when/if we will finally be able to get a nightly build that
has PSM built in so we do not have to install it separately (which has not
worked for me and others on Linux, i.e., SSL connections are still
refused).
Thanks,
Charlie
Being worked
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Gervase Markham"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's more than democracy going on here. Largely it comes down to
making a convincing case to the PTB.
Is that me? If so, what does it stand for? ;-)
hopes he didn't mean PHB
Powers That Be. And yes, you're one
Asa Dotzler wrote:
Charlie Zender wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering when/if we will finally be able to get a nightly build
that
has PSM built in so we do not have to install it separately (which
has not
worked for me and others on Linux, i.e., SSL connections are still
refused).
Ok, I figured I would have to do something like that, to be safe. Thanks
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Orrin Edenfield wrote:
Is there anyone who knows if it is safe to have both Netscape 6, and theMozilla on the same machine, and both programs function? I currentlyuse
Asa Dotzler wrote:
Charlie Zender wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering when/if we will finally be able to get a nightly build that
has PSM built in so we do not have to install it separately (which has not
worked for me and others on Linux, i.e., SSL connections are still
refused).
There will be a scheduled downtime this Friday (12/15) for
cvs-mirror.mozilla.org at 22:00 PST. It's expected that
the machine will be back up and running by 03:00 PST the
following morning. This means that anonymous CVS will be
down during that time.
This server is hosted by Source Forge
"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 06:43:00PM -0800, Daniel Veditz wrote:
Eric Vaandering wrote:
How will this be handled with the installer version. Will it come as
part of the browser, or will it be an option to check/uncheck like MailNews?
The netscape
Jesse Ruderman wrote:
Mac
doesn't like the missing menu at all, that's bug 50877.
At least one Windows user doesn't like them missing, either. Is there a bug
to bring them back on all platforms? There's bug 32719, but that's been
marked as a dup of a bug for keyboard shortcuts (?!).
fantasai wrote:
For those objecting on terms of policy, I assert the following:
that it is in mozilla.org's mission statement do do this.
I quote:
"A group exists that is chartered to act as the virtual meeting place
for the Mozilla code. That group is mozilla.org. We will provide a
31 matches
Mail list logo
