DeMoN_LaG wrote:
A) How did you do this?
Long process, I'll see what I can do about duplicating it.
B) Can you do it on Win 2k Pro?
I haven't the faintest idea. I have Win2k kicking around, but have never even
installed it. Which is rather bad, since I have paid close to $200 for it. I
just
rm -f ~/.mozilla/default/bookmarks.html ?
Nope. Probably:
rm -f ~/.mozilla/username/TAB/bookmarks.html :-)
Gerv
Hi
Looks like we'll have to live with this one for awhile.
From going through the bug report and comments there it
is too late for 0.9.1 and even 0.9.2 It seems it will
be in the builds until around 0.9.3
I'm using 2001-05-31-04 and am downloading the lastest
0.9.1 at the moment.
Hi again, just installed 2001-06-01-16 (latest 0.9.1) win
and this bug is still there.
--
steve
http://www.skeeter-s.com/svg
SVG examples for Mozilla
Hello
i have installed several software, like download accelerator, get right
. But those softwares doesnt work automatically with Mozilla and there
is no options for choosing path of default browser. i am sure there are
more software in this condition. What should i do?
G'Day Jeff,
Yea... fair comment, but I have heard that the latesr kernel is just as
crappy ??
Pete
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
In article WdKR6.94362$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter
Moscatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have recently installed Mozilla 0.9 and I now get problems where on
shut down
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58339
CyaNide wrote:
Just thought I post this problem between XMMS and Mozilla 0.9, when XMMS
is playing (listening to music) Mozilla would not start, it says something
along the line of unable to send signal. Mozilla would only starts when
XMMS
David M. Karr wrote:
none == none [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
none The nightlies have been getting usuable again since about the 22nd so
none this really shouldn't be happening.
none It's kind of a pain but have you deleted your profile recently and
none uninstalled
Haydn wrote:
Haydn wrote:
McAffee is attacking Mozilla on my win2000 box. A couple of weeks ago
I updated McAffee and lost the navagation toolbar on 0.9. It appears
that xpcom.dll was corrupted. Today I did it again, and mozilla.exc
was deleted from build 2001052708 after
And it came to pass that jesus X wrote:
Christopher Jahn wrote:
Put these lines in your Mozilla profile's prefs.js to
disble pop-ups:
user_pref(capability.policy.default.windowinternal.open,
noAccess);
user_pref(capability.policy.popupsites.windowinternal.open
, noAccess);
Now here's a
And it came to pass that Carlfish wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2001 23:58:13 -0400, DeMoN_LaG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] somehow managed to
type:
AOL already said no to their renewal. They said something
to the affect of We don't need your adverising. Which
they don't. They have, what, 9.2 ^ 10
i am going through the (nasty but spiritually rewarding) process of making
my sites standards compliant.. i can now get some pages on my site to
validate successfully as valid HTML 4.01 Strict and valid CSS..
the site looks great in IE5.5 and Oprah.. however, Netscrape 6 and Mozilla
0.9 both
In article pJhS6.13883$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
StOo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the site looks great in IE5.5 and Oprah..
First a talk show, then movies, then a magazine, and now a WEB BROWSER?
When is Ms. Winfrey going to stop? ;-) (Oww... okay okay, sorry for
the levity...)
--
TommyBee
TommyBee wrote:
In article pJhS6.13883$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
StOo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the site looks great in IE5.5 and Oprah..
First a talk show, then movies, then a magazine, and now a WEB BROWSER?
When is Ms. Winfrey going to stop? ;-) (Oww... okay okay, sorry for
the
Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, StOo wrote:
the problem is Netscape seems to be adding tons of padding (or
something) to
tables, seemingly from absolutely nowhere.. check the following page for
example:
BTW, this isn't a Netscape 6 newsgroup, although kinda close
since Netscape 6 is based on Mozilla, and this is a Mozilla
newsgroup. However, this place isn't for web
developers/designers either, unless you uncover a layout
bug, which doesn't seem to be the case here.
when i viewed the site
StOo wrote:
please, point me in the right direction then :)
Sorry, I meant to mention other places you can consult.
There are definitely web design newsgroups, I just don't
participate in any of them to recommend any. However, I am
on the webdesign-L mailing list, which is actively
is there a NG for people like me who want others to debug their sites for
them? (did i say that out loud?! ;)
Not round here, at least not yet :-(
Gerv
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Alex wrote:
You use background-color: transparent all over the place.
I know that the W3C's CSS validator mentions this as a
warning, but it isn't necessary since by default they are
transparent. Warnings are not violations in CSS compliance.
There's a reason the
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, StOo wrote:
That's because the paragraph in the table is being given margins. Add the
folowing to your stylesheet to fix it:
td p { margin: 0; }
thanks for your speedy reply.. i really do appreciate it. unfortunately,
that change, although it kinda fixed my problem,
20 matches
Mail list logo
