> (sorry, bugzilla baffles me)
You'd be better off explaining how - bug reports here go unheeded 99% of
the time :-)
Gerv
> user_pref("capability.policy.default.windowinternal.open", "noAccess");
I have a hazy recollection that the name of the pref may have changed.
Search n.p.m.security.
Gerv
Guten Tag!!
In the builds newsgroup and I see also on the checkins page, they
talk about static builds. Does anybody know what this is and what it does?
Thank you for your help!
David Nickel
JTK wrote:
> DeMoN_LaG wrote:
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/19832.html
> > Redhat made 3.7m in profits this year, bringing them into the black ink
> > for the first time. Do you consider them a "business" now?
> I always did. Was this intended for the Savior?
Maybe, but it does ill
I currently have a problem accessing sites which previously worked OK
As an example, if I go to www.mapblast.com in Netscape I get a screen which
does not give me the facillity to obtain directings in Europe.
When viewed in IE the screen image is completely different and I can search
european ro
Plypipe Manufacture Co Ltd.
6-10F,16 Zumiao Road
Foshan, 528000
Guangdong, China
Tel:(86)757 2302816
Fax:(86)757 2302879
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] & [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.plypipe.com
Dear Sir/Madam
If your company is in the line of pipe, plumbing or faucet materials, we would
Alexander Sperduti wrote:
>Do you know if the InternetShortcut object could be added to Win95 by
>upgrading system dll's or adding registry keys? If I'm lucky, the whole
>thing may reside in a single dll supplied in the IE installation.
>
I don't know what DLL the objects is registered from
Mozilla is becoming really good now, but still badly lacks a spell
checker. Maybe there will be an open source spell checker in the future,
now it's really a problem. Specially for me, I have to write mails in 3
languages. I found a really nice solution for this problem: I downloaded
Netscape
Chris Waterson wrote:
> Christopher Blizzard wrote:
>
Although it might've been hard for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to keep up with
the number of approval requests, I think they've done a terrific job!
Thanks guys!
I think the main reason that we improved stability was because of the
status updates
Chris Waterson wrote:
>
> Christopher Blizzard wrote:
>
> Getting a= hurts (probably you -- drivers@ -- more than me!), but I
> think it did make a positive difference.
> I'll be a bit sorry to see it go. My $0.02.
Me too!
Admittedly I've only ever made one patch to Mozilla, but it was duri
Allan Peda wrote:
>...
> Mozilla however insists on first giving me a prompt to confirm a
> launch with freeamp, even though I have the correct mime type
> specified.
>
> Is this a registry setting or what. Since MSIE asks for no such
> confirmation, I figure Mozilla is being extra cautious.
Ye
upgrading system dll's or adding registry keys? If I'm lucky, the whole
thing may reside in a single dll supplied in the IE installation.
I did try associating to Netscape, but then all Netscape did was open it
like it was a text file.
I have a fresh load of Win95 first edition with Netscape 6.01 only.
No other browsers allowed. :-)
I'm surprised that Netscape didn't set itself as the default browser.
Garth Wallace wrote:
>
> David Wilson wrote:
>
> >
> > As of today, the milestone page (http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html)
> > appears somewhat out of date lacking even the actual release date for
> > Moz 0.9.1 and with no tentative schedule for the next release(s). I
> > use this page to fol
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/19832.html
>
> Redhat made 3.7m in profits this year, bringing them into the black ink
> for the first time. Do you consider them a "business" now?
I always did. Was this intended for the Savior?
God what a feeb.
Christopher Blizzard wrote:
> The tree did manage to maintain the same quality of the time right
> before the release of the 0.9.1 milestone. However, we think that it
> wasn't because of the fact that drivers were approving specific bugs.
> With only a few specific exceptions we approved almost
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
>
> Quicktime 4 and 5 can read png mime types, naturally.
>
> see the enclosed "small" image
>
> note the reference to PNG Image.
Of course. The thing is that there is no reason why you'd want it to
handle PNGs when the browser can do it natively and not forc
During the 0.9.1 -> 0.9.2 milestone period drivers was trying a policy
where all bugs that were checked into the tree had to be approved by
drivers before it could be checked in. We were doing this as an
experiment to see if it would make any changes in the overall quality
of the tree, specifical
nospam@nospam wrote:
> also, when I visit pages hosted by tripod, geocities,etc,
> little rectangular windows pop
> up with adverts in them. Is there any way to disable these
> pop up windows?
There used to be a user preference for this:
user_pref("capability.policy.default.windowinternal.open"
Alexander Sperduti wrote:
>Help!
>
>I have a ton of URL links in a folder, but double-clicking them doesn't work
>with Netscape!
>I'm using Win95 first release, Netscape 6.01, and NO IE.
>
>Normally, with IE, double-clicking a *.URL file would launch the browser and
>load the web page. But with
Redhat made 3.7m in profits this year, bringing them into the black ink
for the first time. Do you consider them a "business" now?
Duane Clark wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I notice (Build 2001062006 mozilla-i686-pc-linux) that when, for
> example, I go to Atom Films:
>
> http://www.atomfilms.com/
>
> and then I click on one of the areas, say "Cinema", it correctly takes
> me to the page for that film. But unlike what I am used t
On 20 Jun 2001 14:03:28 -0400, Alexander Sperduti wrote:
> Normally, with IE, double-clicking a *.URL file would launch the browser and
> load the web page. But with Netscape, I just get the "associate file with
> application" window. And associating Netscape with *.URL doesn't work
> either.
If
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:46:04 -0400, Alexander Sperduti wrote:
> Thanks, Raf, adding Url.dll (which was not in the original Win95) and the
> registry keys listed in dialr95.html worked, and I didn't have to load IE!
>
> I've got another problem now, double clicking on a *.url link doesn't
> g
Help!
I have a ton of URL links in a folder, but double-clicking them doesn't work
with Netscape!
I'm using Win95 first release, Netscape 6.01, and NO IE.
Normally, with IE, double-clicking a *.URL file would launch the browser and
load the web page. But with Netscape, I just get the "associate
David Wilson wrote:
>
> As of today, the milestone page (http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html)
> appears somewhat out of date lacking even the actual release date for
> Moz 0.9.1 and with no tentative schedule for the next release(s). I
> use this page to follow the progress and would like it to
Thanks, Raf, adding Url.dll (which was not in the original Win95) and the
registry keys listed in dialr95.html worked, and I didn't have to load IE!
I've got another problem now, double clicking on a *.url link doesn't
go to that URL. Have any ideas?
"Fabian Schach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
9gollq$kt3$02$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9gollq$kt3$02$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Good thing I didn't because it is already acknowledged in bug 69719
> >
> > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69719
> >
> > There are come hints and tips in t
Hi I'm trying to build mozilla but am having problems.
Does anyone know where there is a build of mozilla for win2000 which has the
Javascript runtime profiler built in it?
If not, for your information this is the error I'm getting:
---
Alexander Sperduti wrote:
> In fact I am using Win95 first release. So I have to load IE to get
> Netscape to dial? This just doesn't seem right...
No you don't.
I can't remember the last time I used Windows but..
My Computer, Dial Up Networking, Connection of choice.
You can also right dra
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:10:03 -0400, RV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Their story line changes every day. First they criticized Open Source,
>then they said their problem was with GPL being a cancer and today Gates
>again misconstrued what Free software means . For him Free means no
>cost, that
Howdy,
I notice (Build 2001062006 mozilla-i686-pc-linux) that when, for
example, I go to Atom Films:
http://www.atomfilms.com/
and then I click on one of the areas, say "Cinema", it correctly takes
me to the page for that film. But unlike what I am used to with
Netscape, the back button won'
I'm using Win95 First Edition. I tried loading the latest DUN 1.3, and it
made no difference...it still doesn't try to connect. And I still don't
have a place to set "Dial-Up" defaults.
In fact I am using Win95 first release. So I have to load IE to get
Netscape to dial? This just doesn't seem right...
Friends of Mozilla
I do contribute fairly regularly by submitting bug reports in the
standard one item/issue per report as best suits fixing and am a
strong Moz supporter to the end.
This, however, is a mixed bag of suggestions directed to folks who may
be surrounded by trees and miss the forest
Anybody having a problem with LinuxToday's homepage? It doesn't seem to
display the left-hand column correctly in Mozilla 0.91 (I'm running it on
Linux here). It displays some sort of thick grey block on top of the
regular information contained in that table.
I checked Bugzilla, but couldn't fi
There is a couple od sites I visit on a regular basis, when I visit these,
it tells me that I need "Java-vm".
Where do I obtain this plugin ?
Pete
> Hi, I'm sure this has been asked before but is there a bug about this?
> I'm unable to set a picture as a windows background picture from the
> context menu
Exactly. Because that feature sucks and is a security problem (well, in NS
4.x, is bypassed the OSes background-setting controls.) Thi
39 matches
Mail list logo
