Re: JavaScript in Mozilla and Netscape6 is not working

Carlfish wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:38:21 +0200, Bernd Khalil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > somehow managed to type: > > >>Uses documents.layers (look at the page source). That's not part of the >>official DOM-Specs by the W3C. Nobody should use it. >>Vice versa: NS4 and IE do it *wrong*. >

Re: JavaScript in Mozilla and Netscape6 is not working

Why don't we all chip in and Raise 100 zillion dollars to buy Gates out then we could correct the MS Mess. . Michael Gratton wrote: > > Carlfish wrote: > > > > > W3C DOM was written by a standards body. The standard is several years > > old, and has been largely ignored by everyone but the Mozi

Re: JavaScript in Mozilla and Netscape6 is not working

Carlfish wrote: > > W3C DOM was written by a standards body. The standard is several years > old, and has been largely ignored by everyone but the Mozilla project, > whose browser is still in beta. DOM Level 1 was based on the DOM of the prevalent browsers at the time - Navigator and IE. Als

Re: XML + CSS in Netscape 6.1 PR?

"N. Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >It's implemented. Post your code so we can see whats wrong. I have a solution now. What I did before was to choose the file on the File menu and open it in a new window. This results in a blank browser window with garbage characters in the title bar.

Re: Another new IE6.0 "refresh" is out

JTK wrote: >Just a little something for Mr. Lairo or anyone who wants to keep tabs >on the competition: > >http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/default.htm > >I wish they'd number these stupid things. The "About" claims that it's >"6.0.2479.0006". Haven't used it much at all yet, but I can't wai

Interesting article!

Follow the link for a very interesting article written by a well known and respected editorialist/college professor .. as opposed to the know nothing/little editorialist from C|net. http://www.netby.net/Oest/Europa-Alle/vermeer/poison.html

Another new IE6.0 "refresh" is out

Just a little something for Mr. Lairo or anyone who wants to keep tabs on the competition: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/default.htm I wish they'd number these stupid things. The "About" claims that it's "6.0.2479.0006". Haven't used it much at all yet, but I can't wait to see the update

Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org

Mama Cass Elliot wrote: > > In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Henno Buschmann say > these wise words: > > > Hallo, > > > > Gervase Markham wrote: > > > >>>It doesn't matter how many browser you checked. You will never have > >>>chacked it on all. > * > > >> This coul

Re: XML + CSS in Netscape 6.1 PR?

Gustaf Liljegren wrote: > > I can't get Netscape 6.1 to render an XML file according to a CSS > stylesheet. Am I doing something wrong, or is this functionality not yet > implemented? Opera can do it, and IE5 too to some extent. It's implemented. Post your code so we can see whats wrong.

Re: Removing Netscape

well, you'd want to keep it for some reasons like ... bankofamerica.com online banking won't accept NS6/mozilla ... there may be other things out there too ... Henri Sivonen wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>I think that using Mozilla solely

Re: XML + CSS in Netscape 6.1 PR?

try looking at these examples ... http://www.mozilla.org/newlayout/xml/xml-devcon/slides/slide1.xml but make sure you use mozilla to view. :) :rob Gustaf Liljegren wrote: > I can't get Netscape 6.1 to render an XML file according to a CSS > stylesheet. Am I doing something wrong, or is this

XML + CSS in Netscape 6.1 PR?

I can't get Netscape 6.1 to render an XML file according to a CSS stylesheet. Am I doing something wrong, or is this functionality not yet implemented? Opera can do it, and IE5 too to some extent. Regards, Gustaf Liljegren

Re: SkyPilot with spell checker - wow!

Hi I solved my self, sorry for the double post. Went here: http://ftp14c.newaol.com/pub/netscape6/english/6.1_PR1/windows/win32/xpi/spellchk.xpi Downloaded to the desk top. Opened the file from there with File + Open File Install program started and now it is installed. Just clicking on the above

Re: Removing Netscape

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that using Mozilla solely is admirable, but probably > unrealistic and risky for the next few years. How come risky? I've been using Mozilla as my primary browser on Solaris since September and on Mac OS X since late

Re: SkyPilot chrome - wow!

Hi I'm also a Sky Pilot fan and was really happy to see the update to 0.9.2 Question how and where can I pick up this spell checker that your talking about? thanks Al Smith wrote: > Forgot to mention, you need to turn off Mozilla, then turn it on again > before the spell checker shows up in yo

Re: Removing Netscape

"John W. Hom" wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I've just installed Mozilla 0.9.2 and its various plugins > from mozilla.org onto my Red Hat Linux box and the thing > works wonderfully! > > I think it's time to say goodbye to Netscape 4.7.5, but > before I do so, I have to ask: > > When Mozilla

Re: Netscape ruling a boost for privacy

Well I'm not giving reason to Netscape, or to the guy who decided to to that, but if you compare this to all Misro$oft did since years to beat up the competition, its nothing. Jon Hall wrote: > I think Kieran McCarthy of The Register said it best. Wouldn't you get > creeped out if you went to

Re: Bug in "Send Link" and "Send Page"?

"Bernd Khalil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > "In practice, URI are delimited in a variety of ways, but usually > > within double-quotes "http://test.com/";, angle brackets > > , or just using whitespace ..." > > > > So I'd say it's fine to u

Re: JavaScript in Mozilla and Netscape6 is not working

Carlfish wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:38:21 +0200, Bernd Khalil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > somehow managed to type: > > >Uses documents.layers (look at the page source). That's not part of the > >official DOM-Specs by the W3C. Nobody should use it. > >Vice versa: NS4 and IE do it *wrong*. > >

Re: JavaScript in Mozilla and Netscape6 is not working

"Carlfish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:38:21 +0200, Bernd Khalil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > somehow managed to type: > > IMHO, anyone who produces a standard should also be responsible for > providing a fully compliant reference implement

Re: Mozilla and Java problem

Jorge Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > I installed j2re 1.3.1 from: > >ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/JDK-1.3.1/i386/FCS/README-j2re > > and I also saw the it was listed in about:plugins (after looking carefully > where the plugins directory was).

Installing themes off-line

Is it possible to install themes without being on-line? I want to install the Skypilot theme on my machine at work but it doesn't have a 'net connection (only certain machines have 'net access at the moment). At x.themes.org the link runs an installer but I did find an old (Nov 2000) copy skyp

Hello; My name is Anthony, How about you giving the review of The Day?

multipart

Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org

Hallo, Gervase Markham wrote: >>Yea, but than it is valid HTML and if the browser couldn't interpret it, >>its not our fault. >> > You'd rather we used valid HTML that looked terrible/crashed browsers than > slightly invalid or deprecated HTML which worked everywhere? I don't know. But it isn't

mozilla 0.9.2 + j2re1.3.1 = Internal error: Null plugin manager

Hello, Sorry for disturbing, but I got Internal error: Null plugin manager after trying to see a page with java in mozilla 0.9.2 . I checked the PATH and about:plugins I installed as a normal user both packges: mozilla and j2re. Any ideas? Thanks in advance.

Removing Netscape

Hello everyone, I've just installed Mozilla 0.9.2 and its various plugins from mozilla.org onto my Red Hat Linux box and the thing works wonderfully! I think it's time to say goodbye to Netscape 4.7.5, but before I do so, I have to ask: When Mozilla migrated my Netscape profile, did it

bookmarks question

Hmmm ... just have a question about how the bookmarks are supposed to be working these days. I test mozilla / NS builds at home and at work, and I've got some different behavior happening depending on where i use it and what build i'm using so i'm sorta wondering what is supposed to be hap

Re: OT: about criticising other poster's language skills

Carlfish wrote: > On 12 Jul 2001 09:37:33 GMT, Mama Cass Elliot > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> somehow managed to type: > > >>Well, yes - I agree that non-Canadian Americans are ignorant! I myself am >>neither American nor British. >> > > Yes, you're from that country where they're all too lazy t

Re: Mozilla should put the Signature ABOVE the Quoted Text, when "start my reply above the quoted text" is selected in prefs

> Then the RFC is bad. Software should work the way the user wants it to > work (within reason, of course). If a mail client needs to know where a > sig is, then why not define it as: > > -- = sig beginning > > ++ = sig end > > That way the sig could be anywhere. Simple, elegant, make everybody

Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org

> And i think its not very fair. I try here to help you, but what are you > going to do? You correct my wrong english (you *can* correct it, but > then by mail please). Writing here in english i don't care about the > right spelling every time. I thought it didn't matter, but i was wrong... Don't

Re: poor HTML on mozilla.org

> > This could be said of any web site, including the improved version which > > you are about to produce. > > Yea, but than it is valid HTML and if the browser couldn't interpret it, > its not our fault. You'd rather we used valid HTML that looked terrible/crashed browsers than slightly invalid

Re: MS surrenders! IE not integrated with WinXP after all!!

Nothing has changed from what I have now in Windows98.The concession is to allow any non-Microsoft apps on the desktop.Up until this,Microsoft wanted to keep everything out which they did not choose. Øyvind Berg wrote: > > From the Register [http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20327.html] >

Re: Where is the pref. config. file?

All the stuff should be in Windows/Application Data/Mozilla/Users50/your user name/a bunch of letters and numbers,etc.THat's where pref.js lives. D. Alvarado wrote: > > Hi, What is the preference file (configuration file) that is used initially for >default preferences (i.e. the one that sets "

Re: OT: about criticising other poster's language skills

On 12 Jul 2001 08:41:39 GMT [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carlfish) wrote: >On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 17:14:55 GMT, Hans-Peter Fischer ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> somehow managed to type: >>On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:34:39 +0200 Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>The US is about to face relative insignificanc

Re: OT: now it's about the meaning of life (almost) :-)

Hi, Peter. On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 22:46:46 +0200 Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hans-Peter Fischer wrote: > >> They have *always* been *culturally* insignificant. ;-) > >(switches hats) This statement is something that has always bothered me, >because many Germans only see certain aspect

Re: SkyPilot chrome - wow!

Albert wrote: > Al Smith wrote: > >> I just installed the SkyPilot theme on Mozilla 0.9.2 a couple of >> hours ago and I've been playing with it. All I can say is WOW! >> >> This skin package is head and shoulders above anything else I've seen >> for Mozilla. It's the way a theme should be ma