Re: whats missing from mozilla?

2001-09-20 Thread Emlyn
> * Netscape's icon > * Netscape's throbber > * Netscape's splash screen > * Netscape & partner logos in about: > * The string "Netscape" in the UI I hate to break it to you, but the string "Netscape" does appear in the Mozilla ui. Try making a page such as Not that I'm complaining. I know

Re: mailnews.reply_header_type

2001-09-20 Thread Andre' Wohnig
On 09/20/2001 08:36 PM, Holger Metzger wrote: > Are you trying to have a customized x-header line or a customized reply > intro line? A customized reply intro line. > user_pref("mailnews.reply_header_type", 1); > > Bedeutungen: > 0 = No Reply-Text > 1 = wrote: - Netscape 3.xx/4.xx style > 2

Re: is mozilla stable?

2001-09-20 Thread Emlyn
Despite the remarkable stabilty of Mozilla, I'd say if you're not a webdesigner (me) or a techie (them) then you probably should hold off investigating Mozilla and related technologies such as Netscape 6 for a few more months. It has some strange hiccups which make it not so fun to use, and curren

Re: IE6.0 Released

2001-09-20 Thread Chris Hoess
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Pierre Chanial wrote: >> They claim IE6 has a full CSS Level1 and DOM1 support. >> Is it that right? > > Define "full". Support almost, but not entirely, unlike standards compliance? ;-) It's better, certainly, but...ht

Re: has anyone tried to build mozilla under win32 with one of the win32 GCC ports?

2001-09-20 Thread DeMoN LaG
Daniel Veditz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 21 Sep 2001: > Jonathan Wilson wrote: > >> As opposed to using visual C++? >> Other than the use of NMAKE, what other visual C++ only >> technologies does mozilla use? >> Is there any reason why a "port" to

Re: whats the difference between the NPL and the MPL

2001-09-20 Thread Daniel Veditz
Jonathan Wilson wrote: > From the looks of the NPL, its a set of amendments that go on top of the > MPL. > Can someone explain in laymans terms what these amendments mean and why > they are necessary? > Why isnt the code just all relicened under the MPL? http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/FAQ.html htt

Re: has anyone tried to build mozilla under win32 with one of the win32 GCC ports?

2001-09-20 Thread Daniel Veditz
Jonathan Wilson wrote: > As opposed to using visual C++? > Other than the use of NMAKE, what other visual C++ only technologies > does mozilla use? > Is there any reason why a "port" to gcc win32 wouldnt be possible? > There have been attempts to switch the windows builds over to autoconf and

Re: a mozilla trick

2001-09-20 Thread Daniel Veditz
jesus X wrote: > benjamin mooney wrote: > >>is there a way that chrome files can be accessed within a web page and >>used functionaly? i tried taking a copy of editor.xul and calling it >>from an iframe, it displayed perfectly but lost all functionality. > > No. That type of operation has been

Re: default sidebar off?

2001-09-20 Thread Henri Sivonen
In article <9oe0hq$2gpa$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would love to be able to enter Mozilla without seeing the > sidebar. I turn it off every time I enter, but Mozilla > never remembers that it is hidden when I exit. Any ideas? Hide the sidebar. Then close the window. -- H

Re: default sidebar off?

2001-09-20 Thread Jay Garcia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I would love to be able to enter Mozilla without seeing the > sidebar. I turn it off every time I enter, but Mozilla > never remembers that it is hidden when I exit. Any ideas? > > This is using Mozilla 0.9.4 > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/2

Re: drop down combo's with kb

2001-09-20 Thread Jay Garcia
Bob Davis wrote: > http://tv.yahoo.com/grid?lineup=us_NH28448&.intl=us&startdate=0&starthour=0 > > Okay now try to open the combo(show the list box) w/o using the mouse. I > can make selections with the down or up arrow but I cant get the list to > show w/o using the mouse to click the arrow i

Re: whats the difference between the NPL and the MPL

2001-09-20 Thread Brian Clark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Emlyn) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Me, I say don't bother. It's the GNU GPL, not the MPL, that makes the > two licsenses incompatable. Check out this link on Mozilla's website: http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html Netscape and Mozilla are relice

has anyone tried to build mozilla under win32 with one of the win32 GCC ports?

2001-09-20 Thread Jonathan Wilson
As opposed to using visual C++? Other than the use of NMAKE, what other visual C++ only technologies does mozilla use? Is there any reason why a "port" to gcc win32 wouldnt be possible?

Internet Gambling Losses Refunded

2001-09-20 Thread support
multipart

Re: Can't install 0.9.4 into Linux Debian 2.2r3

2001-09-20 Thread Ernest Cowan
Thanks for your interest. I installed libstdc++2.9 as well. That got the install past the previous objection. Now it complains: Gtk-CRITICAL**:file gtkprogress.c:line 518 (gtk_progress_set_percentage):assertion 'percentage >=0 && 1.0' failed which it repeats 6 times and then: ./mozilla-installer

default sidebar off?

2001-09-20 Thread david
I would love to be able to enter Mozilla without seeing the sidebar. I turn it off every time I enter, but Mozilla never remembers that it is hidden when I exit. Any ideas? This is using Mozilla 0.9.4 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010913 -- J. David Eisenberghtt

Re: often no BACK button/function on 0.9.4 w2k (linux ok)

2001-09-20 Thread Randall J. Parr
Greg Nee wrote: > i've run into this problem in both win2k and xp. Is there a bug filed > for this? The problem for me is that I can't reliably reproduce it. It > just seems to come up randomly. I get it every time I follow the menus of Orcacle TechNet to http://otn.oracle.com/tech/java/oc4j

Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08)

2001-09-20 Thread Gervase Markham
You have the wrong end of the stick. It's not that way round, it's the other way round - developers who want to combine our code with GPLed apps. We still aren't letting GPLed code into the tree. For one example of a group who want to use our code in a GPLed app, see Galeon. Things like NSPR a

Re: 0.9.3 mail bug

2001-09-20 Thread Mark
ej2k wrote: > Anyone else have this problem and has it been fixed in 0.9.4? So far, I've found that most composition window "oddities" are resolved when you minimize and restore the window. An easy enough workaround for most of the problems I see, but I don't know if it helps in the case you

Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08)

2001-09-20 Thread Gervase Markham
This is not the case. Let's do a thought experiment: You have a file of code. You make three copies and put one of the license header from the MPL, LGPL and GPL on each one. Whenever you make changes to "the file", you update all three copies. If someone wants to use the file, he picks which c

Re: 0.9.3 mail bug

2001-09-20 Thread Duane Clark
ej2k wrote: > Why does the editor bug out with cut & paste? I > try to highlight one word and the entire text of > whatever I cut last glues itself into that > position. If you try to delete the highlighted > portion, the whole message deletes. > > It's *extremely* irritating and one of the

Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08)

2001-09-20 Thread Simon P. Lucy
Since my name has been invoked :-) *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 20/09/2001 at 13:11 Gervase Markham wrote: >>> Note that there are at least two folks--Simon Lucy and myself--who >>> object to specifics in the current proposal for dual licensing (though >>> not the concept i

How to optimize cvs compile

2001-09-20 Thread Colin Thefleau
Hi all, I use mozilla for so long now and I have the feeling that the browser is working slower on my machine on each release and I don't know why. I run FreeBSD 4.4 on a K6II 500 384MB RAM. Mozilla 0.9.3 needed 18 seconds to start, which was already too long for me, but ok, I just keep a windo

Re: feature wish

2001-09-20 Thread Gervase Markham
Greg Nee wrote: > Thanks, gerv, I've already heard the arguments and they have some > validity. But why not use another less-commonly-used key for the same > function? Check the keyboard spec on www.mozilla.org, find an unused key and file a bug. :-) > Anyway, would you happen to be able to

Re: whats missing from mozilla?

2001-09-20 Thread Holger Metzger
Jay Garcia wrote: > The current Netscape release is 6.1 which is basically Mozilla 0.9.2 > with added freatures such as AOL/AIM, Net2Phone, etc. There are some > preferences missing in 6.1 that are included in Mozilla such as the > feature that allows Mozilla users to block images that do not

Re: mailnews.reply_header_type

2001-09-20 Thread Holger Metzger
Andre Wohnig wrote: > Hello all! > > I can change the header type for reply in the file mailnews.js. But i > can only change it to the default. I want to have an user specified > header, but i don't know how to do this. Is there an additional file > where i can define my header? Or do i have

Re: whats missing from mozilla?

2001-09-20 Thread Henri Sivonen
In article <01d501c141f8$cb349400$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Hall Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Netscape Instant Messenger > > Available seperately. Is it 'integrated' into Netscape's > version, like in the sidebar or something ?? It is integrated but optional (like Mail&News). > > *

Re: drop down combo's with kb

2001-09-20 Thread Bob Davis
Okay now try to open the combo(show the list box) w/o using the mouse. I can make selections with the down or up arrow but I cant get the list to show w/o using the mouse to click the arrow icon to the right. bob Jay Garcia wrote: > Bob Davis wrote: > >> Sorry I didnt specify. I meant the dro

Re: 100,000 Bug Sweepstake - Results

2001-09-20 Thread Adam James Fitzpatrick
Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Gervase Markham wrote: >>>what's the prize I have won? ;-) >> From the original post: >>"Asa won a holiday to someplace near Yosemite at the picnic today, but >>the tight-fisted old so-and-so refuses to give it away, so the prize is >>merely a free next-

Re: 0.9.4 mail has funny toolbar

2001-09-20 Thread Henno Buschmann
Hallo, Jason Johnston wrote: > Try re-applying the theme (in Edit>Preferences>Appearance>Themes or > View>Apply Theme). It works, but on the next reboot its back again. What can i do? Thanks, -- Henno Buschmann * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows API Programmierung (Tutorials): http://www.w

Re: whats missing from mozilla?

2001-09-20 Thread Hall Stevenson
> > What things are in the netscape branded browser (netscape > 6) but arent available as part of the mozilla browser? I took the question to mean "what features are available", not what is Netscape *shipping* or including in their package vs the mozilla package. > * Netscape Instant Messenger

Re: IE6.0 Released

2001-09-20 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Pierre Chanial wrote: > > JTK wrote: > >> Oddly enough, the world doesn't seem to be waiting for Mozilla. >> Download the competition here: >> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/default.htm > > They claim IE6 has a full CSS Level1 and DOM1 support. > Is it that right? D

Re: Mozilla is not an end user application--huh?

2001-09-20 Thread Matthew Thomas
Asa Dotzler wrote: > > David Coppit wrote: > > > > Frequently I hear people say "Mozilla is not an end user > > application". Most often this is in reply to people asking about > > spell checkers for mail/news. >... > > If someone were to develop a copyright/royalty/patent free Stop me if I'm wr

Re: View Source and Shorttag

2001-09-20 Thread Henri Sivonen
In article <9obmhv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Garth Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Gus wrote: [...] > > Perhaps I need to clarify: > > The document > > http://css.nu/temp/valid-test1.html > > is written in HTML 4.01

Re: 0.9.4: Mail does not open when starting Mozilla

2001-09-20 Thread Parish
Esben Mose Hansen wrote: > Parish wrote: > >> I have my prefs set to open the browser and mail/news on startup. this >> worked fine in 0.9.2 but when I u/g to 0.9.4 it worked the first time >> I started Moz but ever since then only the browser opens, I have to >> open mail/news from the brows

Re: drop down combo's with kb

2001-09-20 Thread Jay Garcia
Bob Davis wrote: > Sorry I didnt specify. I meant the drop down combo boxes on forms. You > know web pages. > > bob > > Jay Garcia wrote: > >> N. Marshall wrote: >> >>> I think he was talking about the location/address bar. The pull down >>> menus at the top are not combo boxes. >>> >>> Jay

Re: whats missing from mozilla?

2001-09-20 Thread Henri Sivonen
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jonathan Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What things are in the netscape branded browser (netscape 6) but arent > available as part of the mozilla browser? * Netscape Instant Messenger * Spell checker * RealPlayer 8 * Flash Player * AOL Art Plug-in * Various

Re: is mozilla stable?

2001-09-20 Thread Bob Davis
I just wanted to add. The list seems to be kind of long but I think mozilla is very good now. I use mozilla for a couple of reasons. 1. Ability to turn off java script in email. Very important for many viruses 2. More control over my browsing experience For example as of this release 0.9.4 there

Re: drop down combo's with kb

2001-09-20 Thread Bob Davis
Yes Yes Yes. So what do they work with? Anything from the kb. bob Peter Lairo wrote: >> Yes, I know that but different folks use different terminolgies and >> since there is only ONE location/address bar and he pluralized boxes ... > > > > Actually, I think he may be talking about combo boxes

Re: drop down combo's with kb

2001-09-20 Thread Peter Lairo
Bob Davis wrote: > Yes Yes Yes. > So what do they work with? Anything from the kb. > > Peter Lairo wrote: > >> Actually, I think he may be talking about combo boxes within webpages. > -- Regards, Peter Lairo

Re: is mozilla stable?

2001-09-20 Thread Bob Davis
It is more stable. I use it all the time now. Here is my list of things that dont work. 1. sites a. topozone - the mouse clicks arent coming thru b. capitolone - it refuses to use a browser that identifies itself as mozilla and spoofing doesnt fool it 2. There are annoying problems here a

Re: 100,000 Bug Sweepstake - Results

2001-09-20 Thread Peter Lairo
Gervase Markham wrote: >> what's the prize I have won? ;-) > > > From the original post: > > "Asa won a holiday to someplace near Yosemite at the picnic today, but > the tight-fisted old so-and-so refuses to give it away, so the prize is > merely a free next-generation web browser and a year

Re: drop down combo's with kb

2001-09-20 Thread Peter Lairo
Bob Davis wrote: > Sorry I didnt specify. I meant the drop down combo boxes on forms. You > know web pages. I knew it!!! :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) -- Regards, Peter Lairo

Re: 0.9.3 mail bug

2001-09-20 Thread Bob Davis
I get "funny" cursor movement in some email. I havent really pinned it down but if I use the down arrow to move around sometimes it refuses to go down anymore or jumps back to the top of the message. The workaround is to use the mouse. It seems to be related to html email I think. What version

Re: drop down combo's with kb

2001-09-20 Thread Bob Davis
Sorry I didnt specify. I meant the drop down combo boxes on forms. You know web pages. bob Jay Garcia wrote: > N. Marshall wrote: > >> I think he was talking about the location/address bar. The pull down >> menus at the top are not combo boxes. >> >> Jay Garcia wrote: >> >>> Bob Davis wrote:

Re: drop down combo's with kb

2001-09-20 Thread Peter Lairo
> Yes, I know that but different folks use different terminolgies and > since there is only ONE location/address bar and he pluralized boxes ... Actually, I think he may be talking about combo boxes within webpages. These often don't work with te ALT+down-arrow combo. :( :( :( :( :( :( -- R

Re: whats missing from mozilla?

2001-09-20 Thread Eric Vaandering
Jonathan Wilson wrote: > What things are in the netscape branded browser (netscape 6) but arent > available as part of the mozilla browser? > With these items, is anyone working to create a version of them that can > be distributed with the mozilla browser and thats open source or > whatever? If

Re: how do you remove plugins?

2001-09-20 Thread Jay Garcia
George Michaelides wrote: > All > > I am trying to remove the shockwave plugin so that I can test whether a > message comes up to prompt the user for download. > > how do you do this??? > > please help > > > thanks > > George > > > Do HELP / About Plugins, note the path to the shockwave

Re: whats missing from mozilla?

2001-09-20 Thread Jay Garcia
Jonathan Wilson wrote: > What things are in the netscape branded browser (netscape 6) but arent > available as part of the mozilla browser? > With these items, is anyone working to create a version of them that can > be distributed with the mozilla browser and thats open source or > whatever? If

Re: Bugs odd behavior Mozilla .9.4 nightly

2001-09-20 Thread dman84
This could be because of a really large netscape profile of mail, and attachments. After it finishes it will display anything about being completed so you have to hit quit. If you have a large netscape profile (ie 100's of messages and a large amount of megabytes for netscape then) One way

Re: is mozilla stable?

2001-09-20 Thread KH
i have win2000 pro and explorer crashes more often than mozilla... kh

Re: netscape's mozilla

2001-09-20 Thread dman84
Henry Maphosa wrote: > Out of curiosity, what version/release of mozilla is > Netscape 6.x based on. Forgive me if this is a stupid > question but i am new to this stuff, > > t.i.a > > H S N > > __ > Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?

Re: Will running 0.9.3 after installing 0.9.4 break anything?

2001-09-20 Thread Tim Wunder
Rob wrote: > I have both 0.9.3 and 0.9.4 on my computer, and a page that I *think* > displayed correctly using .3 is broken using .4. I would like to run .3 to > find out, but am wondering if doing so will mung my profiles or registry > or > Not for me, anyway. I exit complete from whi

Re: whats the difference between the NPL and the MPL

2001-09-20 Thread Emlyn
> The NPL predates the MPL. It gave Netscape more rights to the > code than the MPL does. It's officially deprecated: no new files > should be checked in under the NPL. But currently NPL files remain NPL. Netscape has the right to relicense them under the MPL (because they have the right to relic

whats missing from mozilla?

2001-09-20 Thread Jonathan Wilson
What things are in the netscape branded browser (netscape 6) but arent available as part of the mozilla browser? With these items, is anyone working to create a version of them that can be distributed with the mozilla browser and thats open source or whatever? If noone is working on one, is there

questions about micrating to moz from ns 4.76

2001-09-20 Thread Jonathan Wilson
1.how do I copy over my preferences, newsgroup settings, email folders, bookmarks etc from netscape 4.76 to mozilla and 2.what items does the branded version of netscape have that mozilla doesnt? I heard that mozilla doesnt have a java runtime, where do I get one? Is there anything else in netsca

Re: Why has it been implemented this slow way

2001-09-20 Thread A Martinez
gavin long wrote: > Wim Roffel wrote: > >> Consider the following a webpage: > > [snip] > >> In Mozilla you will see a counter going rather slowly from 1 to 1000. >> In IE >> you will only see the figure 1000 after a short wait. >> >> I suspect that this is major reason why Mozilla is so slow

how do you remove plugins?

2001-09-20 Thread George Michaelides
All I am trying to remove the shockwave plugin so that I can test whether a message comes up to prompt the user for download. how do you do this??? please help thanks George

Themes fun: how to tell 0.9.4 that LittleMozilla works with it?

2001-09-20 Thread David Gerard
Got LittleMozilla from themes.org ... 0.9.4 refuses to believe that this theme is actually advanced enough to work with it, even though the listing on themes.org claims it has been updated in the past few days. So, what do I fiddle with in the LittleMozilla .jar to get 0.9.4 to accept it? -- h

Re: 0.9.4: Mail does not open when starting Mozilla

2001-09-20 Thread Esben Mose Hansen
Parish wrote: > I have my prefs set to open the browser and mail/news on startup. this > worked fine in 0.9.2 but when I u/g to 0.9.4 it worked the first time I > started Moz but ever since then only the browser opens, I have to open > mail/news from the browser window. > > Before I installed

Re: 0.9.4 doesn't display images properly

2001-09-20 Thread David Gerard
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:00:32 +0200, Fabian Schach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : I've found that 0.9.4 doesn't display photographs on websites : properly. In IE5 they show properly. In 0.9.4 they are blurred and : don't display colours properly. The text part of the page is fine. :>>

mailnews.reply_header_type

2001-09-20 Thread Andre Wohnig
Hello all! I can change the header type for reply in the file mailnews.js. But i can only change it to the default. I want to have an user specified header, but i don't know how to do this. Is there an additional file where i can define my header? Or do i have to make an entry in ~/.mozilla/d

Re: Browser freezes after search results finish loading

2001-09-20 Thread Matthew Cline
Asa Dotzler was touched by the minds of the terrible Old Ones, and imparted unto us these blasphemous ravings: > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77460 Yep, that's it. Thanks!

Re: Why has it been implemented this slow way

2001-09-20 Thread gavin long
Wim Roffel wrote: > Consider the following a webpage: [snip] > In Mozilla you will see a counter going rather slowly from 1 to 1000. In IE > you will only see the figure 1000 after a short wait. > > I suspect that this is major reason why Mozilla is so slow when you have > many input fields. N

Re: feature wish

2001-09-20 Thread Clarence (Andreas M. Schneider)
Greg Nee wrote: > > If this isn't going to be fixed in the general release, can somebody at > least instruct me how to map a single key to the "back" function? I've made a XPI that restores the old behavior: http://clarence.de/tests/BackspaceGoesBack.xpi But I'd still prefer to have this in sta

Re: feature wish

2001-09-20 Thread Greg Nee
Thanks, gerv, I've already heard the arguments and they have some validity. But why not use another less-commonly-used key for the same function? Say, for instance, the keypad-minus key? It's almost never used for anything else and sits at the corner of the keyboard for quick access. The downs