Re: Anti-aliased fonts in Mozilla Unix: does it really work?

Joao Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:... > I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts as > well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla render > fonts as elegantly as Konqueror. > > But, despite

Re: bookmark notify

Johnny Cage wrote: > I was wonder if there was a bug in the bookmarks notify, its seem i > can't do properties on any of the bookmark its grayed out. is it a bug > or did they turn it off for 1.0? > try restarting mozilla.. and also try creating a new profile.. this may help. -Dennis

Re: Java plugin not installing for Mozilla

LH wrote: > Thank you - you right I should've done more searching before posting > my message. I did do that, and finally figured out exactly what I > had to copy and where. I actually did read the release notes and was > confused by several statements there that made it seems like everything

Re: Mozilla 0.9.9 & Drudge Report

Bundy wrote: > Karl typed: > >> Mozilla 0.9.9 doesn't display www.drudgereport.com correctly. One of >> the most popular Web sites. >> >> Karl > > > Bug that deals with the horizontal line within a table tag with > height attrabutes. The tag is W3C (like they matter) complaint although > th

Re: Considering Mozilla upgrade from Netscape

Christian Biesinger wrote: > Bundy wrote: > [java under windows] > >> 1 file under windows? Name it. > > > NPOJI610.DLL > And you've found that file just using the JRE? I tried on several occasions, with several JREs, and was only ever to find it using the J2SDK 1.4.0, much to my annoyance

Re: Spellchecker

RV wrote: > Parish wrote: > >> WFM too on my work machine. I installed 0.9.9 today. Only difference I >> can see here is that you (WDA) are running on Win9x, I'm running W2K, >> but Eric is running XP. Maybe it's an XP issue? > > > running on XP here and it crashes for me everytime too. > >

Re: AOL sez goodbye to IE (yes, IE)

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/24364.html Did you noticed, than an AOL employee claims he never will use AOL from home.. if ppl working there don't want to use it...

Re: Java plugin not installing for Mozilla

Hi, You know I bet a lot of users, especially the beginners, wonder why java isn't working after installing mozilla. It would be really helpful to new users if Mozilla copied those files to its own plugin directory during the installation. This of course assumes that Sun java is already on your

Is there a simple way to transfer netscape emails from one PC to another... ?

Is there a simple way to transfer netscape emails from one PC to another... ? * Is is simpler to use a home networking switch or a CD burner to transfer Netscape mail from one PC to another... Both my PC's have Netscape 6.0

bookmark notify

I was wonder if there was a bug in the bookmarks notify, its seem i can't do properties on any of the bookmark its grayed out. is it a bug or did they turn it off for 1.0?

Re: What happened to my sidebar?

Thanks! Iwas in EST instead of actual MST. :-[ Jay Garcia wrote: >phil, > >Check your time and time/zone settings. You replied BEFORE the question >was asked !! :-D >

Way Off Topic: Re: AOL sez goodbye to IE (yes, IE)

I don't really want to be a slashdot apologist, but it is one of the top sites I visit. The goof was sort of like reporting the wrong candidate has won the presidential election, no wait the major news outlets do that roughly 10% of the time(pre-1900 doesn't count since they didn't announce t

0.9.9 installer won't run on my Win2k box

I've just installed 0.9.9 on my Debian Woody box, and it's great!!! Lovely improvement over 0.9.8, with seemingly a bit more speed, and some of the tab bugs fixed. However, when I try to run the installer for win32 on my Win2k box, (mozilla-win32-0.9.9-installer.exe), the installer seems to gr

Re: What happened to my sidebar?

phil, Check your time and time/zone settings. You replied BEFORE the question was asked !! :-D -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org

Re: truetype support under linux; only bold fonts?

Torgeir Veimo wrote: > I'm using the nightly from march 11th. All fonts rendered with the > freetype font support appear bold, if I'm not using antialiasing. Have > anyone else seen this? > yes. i see this. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130465

Re: What happened to my sidebar?

Jay Garcia wrote: > On 03/13/2002 9:49 PM, Jim Gabele wrote: > >>I haven't used the sidebar for a while, because I prefer to >>see web pages at full screen. I tried to use it today, but >>the tab will not pull out. Nor will it jump out when I >>click on it. This occurs in both Mozilla 0.9.9

Re: 0.9.9 can't open site which 0.9.8 could ?

Yeh You-Ying wrote: > > > It may be the same issue while visiting http://www.dcview.com.tw > JavaScript issue ? I don't see anything wrong with the page.

Re: What happened to my sidebar?

Try View/Sidebar or key F9. Jim Gabele wrote: > I haven't used the sidebar for a while, because I prefer to see web > pages at full screen. I tried to use it today, but the tab will not > pull out. Nor will it jump out when I click on it. This occurs in > both Mozilla 0.9.9 and Netscape 6.

Re: What happened to my sidebar?

On 03/13/2002 9:49 PM, Jim Gabele wrote: > I haven't used the sidebar for a while, because I prefer to > see web pages at full screen. I tried to use it today, but > the tab will not pull out. Nor will it jump out when I > click on it. This occurs in both Mozilla 0.9.9 and Netscape > 6.2.1.

Re: 0.9.9 can't open site which 0.9.8 could ?

Max Bentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 13 Mar 2002: > I only was wondering, because with 09.9.8 the old url still works > fine, only with 0.9.9 the blank site appears. The problem has to do with the javascript on the page. For some reason, it shou

Re: AOL sez goodbye to IE (yes, IE)

Travis Crump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 13 Mar 2002: > And you will also note that by the tenth comment, people were > already correcting the story and an update was posted within an > hour or two. Overall the system works pretty well. Overall, I

Re: Mislabelled "Print" dialogue box?

Parish wrote in message news:... > But the original poster didn't mention his OS and there was no UA string > in the headers. Apologies for the crappy report. This is Mozilla 0.9.9 under Red Hat Linux 6.2. The exact binary is: mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu-0.9.9.tar.gz.

What happened to my sidebar?

I haven't used the sidebar for a while, because I prefer to see web pages at full screen. I tried to use it today, but the tab will not pull out. Nor will it jump out when I click on it. This occurs in both Mozilla 0.9.9 and Netscape 6.2.1.

Free - No games - No BS

http://61.129.78.68/cl5/index.php Some types of rates start under 5% Fed will most likly begin to raise rates soon. Take 2 minutes for a FREE Quote! http://61.129.78.68/cl5/index.php Mortgage rates have NEVER been lower. Is your credit good? Get a loan beyond your wildest expectations!

Re: Mozilla and Real Player Plugin

RV typed: > dman84 wrote: > >> works for me, thanks.. just seen this fix on mozillazine for 0.9.9 >> discussion too.. > > > > I posted it there too (bandido) > To lurkers, it's mozillazine.org not .com or beware!! The Netster will grab your computer!!! -- Kyle

Re: Mozilla 0.9.9 & Drudge Report

Karl typed: > Mozilla 0.9.9 doesn't display www.drudgereport.com correctly. One of > the most popular Web sites. > > Karl Bug that deals with the horizontal line within a table tag with height attrabutes. The tag is W3C (like they matter) complaint although the site isn't, like most site. -

Re: Considering Mozilla upgrade from Netscape

Bamm Gabriana typed: >>>We won't discuss the other plug-ins. To Mozilla's defense, it's not >>>meant to be an easy to use end user product. >> >>Are you saying it's Mozilla's fault if the plugin's installation program >>doesn't install correctly in Mozilla? Fault and fact don't always equal. The

Re: 0.9.9 I love it!....BUT

Sounds like a bug in Mozilla. In the Windows registry, the "Default Icon" should not be set to Mozilla.exe when the association is made. I associated .ico files with IrfanView without any problems. If Moz associated icons properly, double-clicking these files will open them in Mozilla but their

Messaging Server 4.15 - security

Have a question regarding Messaging Server 4.15 and not sure where to post. Help with where to post or answer to question would be greatly appreciated. Running Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 on Netra X1 server running pre-installed Solaris 2.8. Question: How do you config Netscape so that a pas

Re: Mislabelled "Print" dialogue box?

On 03/13/2002 12:48 PM, Parish wrote: > Jay Garcia wrote: >> On 03/12/2002 3:32 PM, kimji wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> It seems the the dialogue box under: >>> >>> Print... Properties... Gap from edge... >>> >>> is not labelled correctly. The fields read: >>> >>> Top: [ ] Bottom: [ ] Left: [ ] Right

Re: Spellchecker

I don't think there is an easy way. The RPMs are all of Mozilla, not just the spellchecker. Spellcheck is essentially the only reason that I run a CVS build. If you have a tree, you just plop the spellcheck directory down in extensions and add "ac_add_options --enable-extensions=default,irc,s

Re: Spellchecker

Parish wrote: > WFM too on my work machine. I installed 0.9.9 today. Only difference I > can see here is that you (WDA) are running on Win9x, I'm running W2K, > but Eric is running XP. Maybe it's an XP issue? running on XP here and it crashes for me everytime too.

Re: Spellchecker

Parish wrote: > Jason Parker wrote: > >> WDA wrote: >> >>> I downloaded a spellchecker for milestone 0.9.8 off of the mozdev.org >>> site. I would like to download the version for 0.9.9 but can't find >>> it on their site. Does anyone know exactly where I can locate it? >>> >>> Thanks >> >> >

Re: Considering Mozilla upgrade from Netscape

Bamm Gabriana wrote: >>>We won't discuss the other plug-ins. To Mozilla's defense, it's not >>>meant to be an easy to use end user product. >> >>Are you saying it's Mozilla's fault if the plugin's installation program >>doesn't install correctly in Mozilla? >> >>Note that Mozilla _is_ meant to be

Re: Mozilla and Real Player Plugin

dman84 wrote: > works for me, thanks.. just seen this fix on mozillazine for 0.9.9 > discussion too.. I posted it there too (bandido)

Re: Mozilla 0.9.9 & Drudge Report

Karl wrote: > Mozilla 0.9.9 doesn't display www.drudgereport.com correctly. One of > the most popular Web sites. Known problem, bug 127549, http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127549 RB > Karl

Re: Considering Mozilla upgrade from Netscape

> > We won't discuss the other plug-ins. To Mozilla's defense, it's not > > meant to be an easy to use end user product. > > Are you saying it's Mozilla's fault if the plugin's installation program > doesn't install correctly in Mozilla? > > Note that Mozilla _is_ meant to be an easy to use produc

last chance! cellphone antenna booster

As seen on late night television. Now you can purchase your own cell phone booster for the fraction of the advertised price The Booster Antenna is a passive device designed to capture the stray radiation inside the body of the phone and re-direct the signal to improve the phone's performance.

Re: filling in a bookmark's description field

Two things, first I thought the "keywords" field was analogous to the keywords meta tag in an html doc. Obviously it is not so please ignore this part of the original question. Second, it is actually the "description" field I am most interested in, and I should have been more explicit and descrip

Re: Spellchecker

WDA wrote: > Eric wrote: >> keeps crashing 0.9.9 for me somehow.. >> >> Eric >> >> >> Parish wrote: >> >>> Jason Parker wrote: >>> WDA wrote: > I downloaded a spellchecker for milestone 0.9.8 off of the > mozdev.org site. I would like to download the version for 0.9.9 but

Re: Spellchecker

Eric wrote: > keeps crashing 0.9.9 for me somehow.. > > Eric > > > Parish wrote: > >> Jason Parker wrote: >> >>> WDA wrote: >>> I downloaded a spellchecker for milestone 0.9.8 off of the mozdev.org site. I would like to download the version for 0.9.9 but can't find it on thei

Re: 0.9.9 can't open site which 0.9.8 could ?

On 3/13/2002 6:48 AM DeMoN LaG wrote: > Max Bentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12 Mar 2002: > >> Maybe someone could please check this too, if the same problem >> appears ? Or missed I something? > > The problem is: > if (document.location.host !

Automatically start JRE on startup???

Hi. I'm starting my wife on Mozilla for the first time (I've been using it since around M16). I would like it so that whenever the program is started the JRE is also loaded. The main sites she use all use Java to some degree, and it's easier for her to start the JRE at the same time. Is

Re: Spellchecker

Eric wrote: > keeps crashing 0.9.9 for me somehow.. > > Eric > > > Parish wrote: > >> Jason Parker wrote: >> >>> WDA wrote: >>> I downloaded a spellchecker for milestone 0.9.8 off of the mozdev.org site. I would like to download the version for 0.9.9 but can't find it on thei

Mozilla 0.9.9 & Drudge Report

Mozilla 0.9.9 doesn't display www.drudgereport.com correctly. One of the most popular Web sites. Karl

Re: Considering Mozilla upgrade from Netscape

hi kyle, or should i call you Netscape Basher, or Bundy? Man, you go by many names > You've got to know exactly what files in what directory and > transfer to them to the current directory under Mozilla same thing for IE, i once did a clean install of XP Pro, and for some reason only adm

Re: collected addresses delete history.mab?-Fixed myself

Stosh wrote: > This worked for me on 6.2.1, but when I installed 0.9.9 on top, it took > over my 6.2.1 profile, and I can look in history.mab and see it > collecting addresses in there. Is there a workaround for 0.9.9 or is > this a known bug still being worked? > > Closest I could find was 6

Re: Considering Mozilla upgrade from Netscape

Bundy wrote: [java under windows] > 1 file under windows? Name it. NPOJI610.DLL > Netscape 6.2.1 requires zero file > transfers to get Java working. That's because it's installed using the installer. Note that the XPI file for installing Java has also always worked when I tried, though the l

Re: Question about plugins

Pratik wrote: > I don't understand the path for Unix. Shouldn't it be in the *profile* > directory and not the user. IIRC, this wasn't done so because it was far too much effort for too little gain. -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither

collected addresses delete history.mab?

This worked for me on 6.2.1, but when I installed 0.9.9 on top, it took over my 6.2.1 profile, and I can look in history.mab and see it collecting addresses in there. Is there a workaround for 0.9.9 or is this a known bug still being worked? Closest I could find was 65654... Thanks, Stan

Re: Spellchecker

keeps crashing 0.9.9 for me somehow.. Eric Parish wrote: > Jason Parker wrote: > >> WDA wrote: >> >>> I downloaded a spellchecker for milestone 0.9.8 off of the mozdev.org >>> site. I would like to download the version for 0.9.9 but can't find >>> it on their site. Does anyone know exactly

Re: Can't save an image from mail

Same thing happens to me (on Linux). In 0.9.8, nothing happens. There was a (later) 0.9.9 nightly build that did work; unfortunately, I deleted it when the release 0.9.9 came out. Phil Jim Gabele wrote: > Is this only in my system, or is it a bug? Can someone try it and let > me know. This

Re: No privacy levels in 0.9.9??

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph N. wrote: > I skipped over ver. 0.9.8 because of some of the reported issues, but have > installed ver. 0.9.9. Although I am generally enthusiastic about its > quality and speed, it seems (or perhaps it was 0.9.8) to have abandoned the > protocol of allo

No privacy levels in 0.9.9??

I skipped over ver. 0.9.8 because of some of the reported issues, but have installed ver. 0.9.9. Although I am generally enthusiastic about its quality and speed, it seems (or perhaps it was 0.9.8) to have abandoned the protocol of allowing cookies based on privacy levels," i.e., where the c

Re: Blue screens of death since Moz 9.9

Rupert James wrote: > I got a BSOD once since installing Moz .99 -- but since I'm running > Win 98, this isn't exactly uncommon ;-D. However, I was using Moz > at the time (no other applications open) and this BSOD was worse > than usual, requiring a manual reset. By definition, all BSODs re

Re: Question about plugins

The whole point of having it being able to be installed to the user directory is that most users don't(shouldn't) have write permissions to the installation directory of a global install and so can't install plugins there. It is still assumed that if one profile has a plugin installed than al

Re: Considering Mozilla upgrade from Netscape

Christian Biesinger typed: > Bundy wrote: > [Mozilla vs Netscape 6.x] > >> 1) It is more problem free... kind of... To get Java and plug-ins to >> work takes a little bit of effort. (moving files, and a few .js file >> tweaks) > > > I never needed to change a .js file to install Java, I only

Re: AOL sez goodbye to IE (yes, IE)

And you will also note that by the tenth comment, people were already correcting the story and an update was posted within an hour or two. Overall the system works pretty well. DeMoN LaG wrote: > Robert Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 13 Mar

Re: Getting Close

Parish wrote: > > Lee Dillion wrote: > > Pratik wrote: > >> > >> On 03/13/2002 02:24 PM, Pratik wrote: > >> > On 03/13/2002 02:16 PM, Lee Dillion wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> >>I have used all, and nothing comes close to the toolbar in terms of > >> >>functionality. Not a big deal for most, perhap

Re: 0.9.9 and null host mappings

dman84 wrote: > michael lefevre wrote: > >> In article <6xLj8.35076$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> TazMainiac wrote: >> >>> I have a HOSTS file that maps many ad servers to 0.0.0.0 >>> (see http://www.smartin-designs.com). >>> >>> In versions of Mozilla prior to 0.9.9, this worked wonderfully. >> >> >>

Re: Getting Close

Pratik wrote: > On 03/13/2002 02:24 PM, Pratik wrote: >> On 03/13/2002 02:16 PM, Lee Dillion wrote: >> >> >>>I have used all, and nothing comes close to the toolbar in terms of >>>functionality. Not a big deal for most, perhaps. >> >> >> I just looked at the easysearch link posted earlier i

Re: Getting Close

Lee Dillion wrote: > Pratik wrote: >> >> On 03/13/2002 02:24 PM, Pratik wrote: >> > On 03/13/2002 02:16 PM, Lee Dillion wrote: >> > >> > >> >>I have used all, and nothing comes close to the toolbar in terms of >> >>functionality. Not a big deal for most, perhaps. >> > >> > >> > I just looked at

Re: weird scrollbar behaviour

I've also seen some weird behavior with the scroll bars/status bar. For exampe, go to www.mozilla.org, and shrink the window so that it is only slightly larger than the dinosaur head at the upper-left of the page. Where did the scrollbars and status bars go? Now, make it wider (but leave it sh

Re: Getting Close

Pratik wrote: > > On 03/13/2002 02:24 PM, Pratik wrote: > > On 03/13/2002 02:16 PM, Lee Dillion wrote: > > > > > >>I have used all, and nothing comes close to the toolbar in terms of > >>functionality. Not a big deal for most, perhaps. > > > > > > I just looked at the easysearch link posted ear

Re: Java plugin not installing for Mozilla

dman84 wrote: > LH wrote: > >> I can't seem to be able to install the java plugin for Mozilla. >> I am running both Mozilla 0.9.9 and Netscape 6.2.1 on Win2000 >> (not openning them simultaniously, but one at a time). >> When I view pages with applets using NS6.2 - I see the applet >> just fin

Re: U.S. Export Reestrictions

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Presi) wrote in news:7d2d3af3.0203130755.57e9c291 @posting.google.com, on 13 Mar 2002: > I think we need to preserve the free software right without political > reasons. > Um, this isn't like the US is saying "Ok, Italy you can't have this software". Look at the countries t

Looking for volunteers to test a perf build

I have a perfomance fix that will improve page load about 2.5% but I need some test coverage before checkin in. I would really appreciate it if you could go to the bug report below, download the test build (link in the bug) and report how testing went. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?

Re: Getting Close

On 03/13/2002 02:24 PM, Pratik wrote: > On 03/13/2002 02:16 PM, Lee Dillion wrote: > > >>I have used all, and nothing comes close to the toolbar in terms of >>functionality. Not a big deal for most, perhaps. > > > I just looked at the easysearch link posted earlier in this thread and I > t

Re: You have been removed from our mailing list

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote in B0005037164@mail">news:B0005037164@mail, on 13 Mar 2002: > Dear User, > > Thank you for your email. > > As you requested, your email address has been removed form our > system. YAY! -- AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m

Re: Blue screens of death since Moz 9.9

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (JimF) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 13 Mar 2002: > With Win2k + sp2. Seems to happen only if I have the mail open, but I > can't figure out any patterns. Dunno what ROSys.sys is either... > I don't use Mozilla Mail & News, but I have never seen Mozil

Re: AOL sez goodbye to IE (yes, IE)

Robert Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 13 Mar 2002: > Try /. they're quite good. Sorry, /. sucks. I lost all respect for them when they posted an article that Morpheus breaks the GPL. I, quite honestly, feel they should have been sued for

Re: Getting Close

On 03/13/2002 02:16 PM, Lee Dillion wrote: > I have used all, and nothing comes close to the toolbar in terms of > functionality. Not a big deal for most, perhaps. I just looked at the easysearch link posted earlier in this thread and I think thats exactly what you need. Pratik.

Re: .9.9 - Humble impressions from an end user

Parish wrote: > Gervase Markham wrote: >>> Also when it gives the pop up menu saying "so-in-so has new messages," >>> it seems to be tied to the account name. Wouldn't it be more prudent to >>> make this the display name for the account, or even better, let the user >>> choose his or her name?

Re: Mislabelled "Print" dialogue box?

Pratik wrote: > Parish wrote: >> Jay Garcia wrote: >> >>>On 03/12/2002 3:32 PM, kimji wrote: >>> Hi, It seems the the dialogue box under: Print... Properties... Gap from edge... is not labelled correctly. The fields read: Top: [ ] Bottom: [ ] Left: [ ] Righ

Re: Sender is Sendee

"Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 13 Mar 2002: > In Mozilla/ Netscape6 the sumary files are listed as .msf. > > In Communicator 4.X.X they are called .snm Um... yes...? -- AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m

Re: Getting Close

Pratik wrote: > > Lee Dillion wrote: > > I have been downloading nightlies for quite some time just to see the > > progress. Once mozilla gets spellcheck and a google toolbar (two tools that > > are a must for my needs), I'll be making mozilla my default browser and mail > > client. > > There's

Re: Question about plugins

On 03/12/2002 04:37 PM, Parish wrote: > According to the Release Notes for 0.9.9: > > You now have the option of installing plugins in your Mozilla user > directory ($HOME/.mozilla/plugins on Unix). These plugins are loaded in > addition to those in your Mozilla install directory. I don't und

Re: Getting Close

Travis Crump wrote: > As I understand it, spellcheck is scheduled to land several days after > the 1.0 branch is cut. What do you mean by 'google toolbar', I think he means http://toolbar.google.com/ which is for IE only You can, of course, get a Google sidebar for Moz at http://www.google.co

Re: Question about plugins

Christian Biesinger wrote: > Parish wrote: >> Thanks! It works here also. Badly worded Release Notes I think; I >> wouldn't Application Data\Mozilla\Plugins\ >> *your* Mozilla user directory, rather *the* Mozilla user directory. > > Why not, other users have a different directory. > Yes, I re

Re: weird scrollbar behaviour

dman84 wrote: > Jeroen Peters wrote: >> :Murb: wrote: >> >>> the page in wich the problem occurs >>> >>> http://islink.nl/paf/ >>> >>> the in the center positioned div (with a text about cascading >> >> >> >>> >>> when looking the lower arrow is greyed out (as if you can't scroll >>> down),

Re: Mislabelled "Print" dialogue box?

Parish wrote: > Jay Garcia wrote: > >>On 03/12/2002 3:32 PM, kimji wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>It seems the the dialogue box under: >>> >>>Print... Properties... Gap from edge... >>> >>>is not labelled correctly. The fields read: >>> >>>Top: [ ] Bottom: [ ] Left: [ ] Right: [ ] >>> >>>when apparently

Re: Getting Close

Lee Dillion wrote: > I have been downloading nightlies for quite some time just to see the > progress. Once mozilla gets spellcheck and a google toolbar (two tools that > are a must for my needs), I'll be making mozilla my default browser and mail > client. There's the sidebar which has an optio

Re: .9.9 - Humble impressions from an end user

Gervase Markham wrote: >> Also when it gives the pop up menu saying "so-in-so has new messages," >> it seems to be tied to the account name. Wouldn't it be more prudent to >> make this the display name for the account, or even better, let the user >> choose his or her name? > > File a bug on

Re: Mislabelled "Print" dialogue box?

Jay Garcia wrote: > On 03/12/2002 3:32 PM, kimji wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It seems the the dialogue box under: >> >> Print... Properties... Gap from edge... >> >> is not labelled correctly. The fields read: >> >> Top: [ ] Bottom: [ ] Left: [ ] Right: [ ] >> >> when apparently they should be: >> >

Re: Blue screens of death since Moz 9.9

I got a BSOD once since installing Moz .99 -- but since I'm running Win 98, this isn't exactly uncommon ;-D. However, I was using Moz at the time (no other applications open) and this BSOD was worse than usual, requiring a manual reset. RJ JimF wrote: > Anyone else been getting these? >

Re: Getting Close

As I understand it, spellcheck is scheduled to land several days after the 1.0 branch is cut. What do you mean by 'google toolbar', you can probably get the same functionality with keywords or http://easysearch.mozdev.org/ [have never used it]... Lee Dillion wrote: > I have been downloading n

Re: Java plugin not installing for Mozilla

my message. I did do that, and finally figured out exactly what I had to copy and where. I actually did read the release notes and was confused by several statements there that made it seems like everything should "just work"... As you said, after copying the plugins from the Netscape6/Plugin

Getting Close

I have been downloading nightlies for quite some time just to see the progress. Once mozilla gets spellcheck and a google toolbar (two tools that are a must for my needs), I'll be making mozilla my default browser and mail client. Great job. -- Lee Dillion

Can't save an image from mail

Is this only in my system, or is it a bug? Can someone try it and let me know. This happens in Mozilla 0.9.9. Whenever I right click on an image in an e-mail the name of an image is shown properly. However, if I try the save image option, instead of the name of the image being shown when

Re: Java plugin not installing for Mozilla

LH wrote: > I can't seem to be able to install the java plugin for Mozilla. > I am running both Mozilla 0.9.9 and Netscape 6.2.1 on Win2000 > (not openning them simultaniously, but one at a time). > When I view pages with applets using NS6.2 - I see the applet > just fine. With Mozilla I see th

Re: 0.9.9 and null host mappings

michael lefevre wrote: > In article <6xLj8.35076$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, TazMainiac wrote: > >>I have a HOSTS file that maps many ad servers to 0.0.0.0 >>(see http://www.smartin-designs.com). >> >>In versions of Mozilla prior to 0.9.9, this worked wonderfully. > > > it did? i had dialogs popping u

Re: U.S. Export Reestrictions

> If Mozilla is a international free software project supported by > developers of many countries (not only from U.S.), why is under U.S. > export laws?? Because the development of the cryptographic software was done in the US, and the primary download servers are in the US, and both the code

Re: scroll -- possible bug?

Jerry Park wrote: > Mozilla responds to a wheel mouse as expected. However, using a touchpad > with virtual scrolling, there is no response in mozilla, though all > other programs seem to respond well. Is this a known problem? Sort of. Touchpad drivers like that are a bit of a hack - they look

Refresh all tabs at once?

Hi All, Is there a key combination available to refresh all tabs at once? Thanks in advance, --Ed

Java plugin not installing for Mozilla

(not openning them simultaniously, but one at a time). When I view pages with applets using NS6.2 - I see the applet just fine. With Mozilla I see the "Click here to get the plugin". I tried downloading and installing the jre1.3 plugin several times, both by clicking on the icon and by going to

Re: U.S. Export Reestrictions

Presi wrote: > If Mozilla is a international free software project supported by > developers of many countries (not only from U.S.), why is under U.S. > export laws?? The stupid US Government tries to censor information for certain countries when the program contains cryptographic code. Yes, I

Re: 0.9.9 and null host mappings

In article <6xLj8.35076$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, TazMainiac wrote: > I have a HOSTS file that maps many ad servers to 0.0.0.0 > (see http://www.smartin-designs.com). > > In versions of Mozilla prior to 0.9.9, this worked wonderfully. it did? i had dialogs popping up all over the place in 0.9.7 and .

Re: .9.9 - Humble impressions from an end user

Kenneth Pardue wrote: > Regarding the mail notification... IT'S ABOUT TIME! One of the concepts > I love is to have Moz humming away in the background, having all of my > connections still running, checking my mail etc. on my nice cable modem > and being able to tell at a glance at the screen

0.9.9 and null host mappings

I have a HOSTS file that maps many ad servers to 0.0.0.0 (see http://www.smartin-designs.com). In versions of Mozilla prior to 0.9.9, this worked wonderfully. All these ad servers were mapped to 0.0.0.0, the connections were immediately refused and Mozilla went on it's way. Now in 0.9.9, I'm get

Re: 0.9.9 can't open site which 0.9.8 could ?

Hi, thanks a lot!!! >> >> It works if you use http://www.sparkasse-aachen.de >> Yes, it works perfect with the link http://www.sparkasse-aachen.de, so I am really happy with that! >> There's some kind of problem with the javascript because it seems to >> think it's never on the right sight an

  1   2   >