Re: Re: Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do?

Charlie in San Francisco wrote: > Tim Wunder wrote: > >> DeMoN LaG wrote: >> >>> Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 18 Dec 2001: >>> As someone who dual-boots (although I haven't booted into Windows for quite some time), access to

Re: Mozilla 0.9.4 2001122420 vs latest 0.9.7

nearco wrote: > How do these differ? What is the main difference? > > I can just see it ... a post by "JTK" that says "Nothing." Am I good or what?

Re: Access to the port number given has been disabled for security reasons

Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > > > On Wednesday 26 December 2001 10:31 pm, Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > > >>I want to browse a machine on my LAN whose web server runs off port >>79. I can do so with the lynx, konqueror and opera browsers, as I >>expect. > > > -Chuck > Quoting http://www.geocitie

Re: Theme gfx screwed after switch 011227

-sky- wrote: > When switching from classic to modern in build 2001-12-27 the > theme gets distorted gfz, and all messages in say a newsgroup > seems to be marked as read. > > I re-started mozilla, and now it is working. > I thought theme-switching required a restart, but it didn´t > in this buil

Re: Can Disk Cacheing Be Stopped Entirely In NS4.7?

Joe Cuervo wrote: > Joe Cuervo wrote: > >> Net_Test wrote: >> >>> >>> Or perhaps, is there a program that downloads from servers >>> but does not cache? >>> >> >> >> http://www.getright.com/ >> > > > ...but yeah, downloading the file to a temp directory > then copying it from there is a bad id

Re: Can Disk Cacheing Be Stopped Entirely In NS4.7?

Christian Biesinger wrote: > Kryptolus wrote: > >> It's been discussed before ... the reason being so that the download >> can actually begin before the user presses the 'Save' button and >> choses a location. > > > This only happens this way

Re: Can Disk Cacheing Be Stopped Entirely In NS4.7?

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: > > Mama Cass wrote: > snip > >>In this case it most definitely should be moved/saved directly to the >>location that the end user chooses, and not left in the Cache until the >>download be complete. >> >>Mama Cass >> > > Want to ask a re

Re: Can Disk Cacheing Be Stopped Entirely In NS4.7?

Mama Cass wrote: > In alt.netscape the people heard Jonas Jørgensen say these wise words: > > >>If you are using Netscape 4.x, you are asking in the wrong newsgroup. >> > > Um, this is alt.netscape . > > > Mama Cass > > This message is crossposted to *5* mozilla newsgroups.

Re: limit number of mozilla-bin processes under linux?

Reid Fleming wrote: > is there a way to limit the number of mozilla-bin processes under 0.9.7 ? > after i startup mozilla there are 5 of them, and _each_ of them uses 27Mb, > with the result that although this machine has _160Mb_, it swaps to disk! > > nice browser otherwise. > > Let me guess

Re: Does Mozilla "-turbo" mode (also known as server mode) work on Linux?

Ben Choi wrote: > I've been looking at Mozilla's "-turbo" mode and have read that it only > works for Windows. However, I'm working with Mozilla 0.9.5 on Linux and > noticed that it appears to work there as well. > > > [snip] > > Is there something I'm missing here, or am I getting this func

Re: About Secure Pages etc?

Neville Cobb wrote: > I wanted to puraches some books on line and the particular site said > that it uses SSL to encrypt pades and that anything sent back would be > encrypted. However The security lock on mozulla did not turn yellow (nor > was it highlighted in MS Explorer either). > > Can t

Re: "Unknown Socket Type" error

Johnny Yen wrote: > Went to bestprices.com with Sunday's build and attempted to place an order > (I've ordered here using Mozilla many times). > > THIS time, when I get to the final screen to place the order (hitting the > order button) I now get an "Unknown Socket Type" error. Once again, over

Re: Just curious ...

Gregory Spath wrote: > In , Sören Kuklau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>Ever tried to un- and then re-install it? >> > > Several times. New profiles. clean user accounts. Does it every time. > > 0.9.6 works fine. They broke something in the linux build. > > --g >

Re: spellchecking

Pascal Byrne wrote: > Can someone tell me how to enable the spellchecking option on 0.9.7 for > Linux? Is there something in 'all.js' that need to be changed/added? > > Thanks, > pascal > It helps to search bugzilla before asking ... There's no spellcheck included yet, but work is ongoing. h

Re: Is Mozilla red Communist?

Travis Crump wrote: > Am I missing something here? I tried typing Alt+0248, and nothing > happened. I tried it with NumLock on and off, but absolutely nothing > happens...(I am using Gnome 1.4) > >> Justin H. >> > it's a windows "feature"

Re: problem with hotmail.com

Cheng, Yui Pang wrote: > i got the following error message while trying to > login to my hotmail account. > > Unknown socket type. Loading aborted. > > that happens just after i click on the "sign > in" button. > > i didn't do any major cfg changes to my > mozilla, what else do i need to do to

Re: Linux XMMS/Mozilla sound/freeze

Morten wrote: > > Hi. If I have XMMS playing a tune and enter a website with sound > (or possibly just flash?) Mozilla freezes until I stop XMMS, > releasing the sound resources. > > This must be a common problem, any workarounds? This is not an > issue with other applications (ie. TV Card). >

Re: Error: "Temporary directory doesn't exist. Enter new directory in the preferences box"

C. E. wrote: > Any ideas or suggestions? Thanks. > > Carlo. > > > Wrong newsgroup. Try snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator

Re: Accidentally messed up my bookmarks folder

Tom Hatta wrote: > I've deleted my Personal Toolbar Folder. Creating a new folder with the > same name doesn't fix it, nor dragging a link to the toolbar area. Does > anyone know how to fix my situation? > View->Set as personal toolbar folder

Re: Accidentally messed up my bookmarks folder

Tom Hatta wrote: >> > > Oh, it just worked! > > My account of what didn't work: > > 1. select folder > 2. View->Set as personal toolbar folder Was the option disabled or did it not do anything? > > My account of what worked: > > 1. double click on the folder so it opens up > 2. View->Set as

Re: ICQ or Eudora open Mozilla windows twice !

Vincent Nicolas wrote: > All is said in the title. > When you clic a link from Eudora or ICQ, Mozilla open 2 windows instead of > one. > This very boring bug stands in Mozilla since last century I guess... > > Anyone knows about a bugzilla ID that references this ? I can't find it > out. > > M

Re: Pls Test: Moz.097 + IE6 + NT-SP - Crash+repair

not_me wrote: > Is there some who mind to test the following and post it in bugzilla: > > NT4.0 + SP6a + Q299444("SP7") ( + IE6+ATi-rage-pci-grafics) > > I had strange probs in IE aswell as in Moz. - not all solved > and guessed, that it might be a good idea to do the IE-repair. > When starting,

Re: Sock(s) It To Me

Holden Caulfield wrote: > > Now, about those SOCKSv4/SOCKSv5 radio buttons. One *has* to be > ticked; I'm not running any SOCKS proxies. I ask, again -- is this > a problem? > > No. The problem is that you don't have PSM installed. The error you are seeing indicates that, albeit it's uncle

Re: Just installed Mozilla 0.9.8 (Linux)

John F. Kohler wrote: > Hello, everyone, > > I just installed the rpm version of 0.9.8 in my AMD PC under Red Hat > Linux 7.2 > and it is working ok so far. > > It does not have Java in it as received. I need to learn where to > download > a copy of Java to use with the browser. > > John Kohle

Re: Mozilla 0.9.8 my experience

alpha wrote: > After all the negative views about moz 0.9.8. > > I have been using for 3-4 days now and I think it is great have not had > any crash yet and using it for all my web browsing (flash installed) and > also using it for all my mail & news. > > No crash, no bugs sofare. > > But!: >

Re: In Agent just use kill filter Author: JTK

JTK wrote: > El Torito wrote: > >> works great! > > > 1. You should change your name to "El Repeato". > 2. Agent? Why are you using Agent? Why aren't you using Mozilla's > Newsreader? > > you must be kind of slow. you're replying to a person who killfiled you. oh gee. that's gonna work!

Re: Delete Hangs All of Mozilla.

Garth Almgren wrote: > JTK wrote: > >> >> 1. Edit something in "composer", and email or newsgroup post. > > > OK. How about this reply? > >> 2. Select some text. > > > OK. I selected your comment at the bottom. > >> 3. Hit the "delete" key. > > > Wow. It deleted the text I selected! Amazi

Re: 0.9.8 under Linux = unusable

Peter Stein wrote: > Just installed 0.9.8 via RPM. Unfortunately it has a serious > bug that IMHO renders it unusable: None of the pop up windows > that require text will actually allow text entry. No cursor > appears in the text field and if the pop up has an action > button then that button is g

Re: 0.9.8 under Linux = unusable

Patrick Gallagher wrote: >> >> open konsole/gnometerminal and type: >> >> whereis mozilla >> >> :) >> > I'll have to try that - will it give me all 3 instances? > > I've got the default ximian install (0.9.8) at usr/bin (default), a > nightly install at usr/share/mozilla and the source build whe

Re: Hot, tight teens get taught a lesson - and you'll see it without paying!

Robert Davies wrote: > > Is no one going to get rid of this guy? > > -- > Regards, Robert Davies > My ICQ UIN is: 2905399 > __ > Do you Netscape?! If not, why not? > http://home.netscape.com/ > Download Netscape 6.2 NOW! > > If you're on DALnet you can > vis

Re: Speed and size

Matt Williams wrote: > Mike Cramer wrote: > >> David Tenser wrote: >> >>> Your word "really", with underscores before and after, gets >>> underlined when reading it in Mozilla Mail. How is that accomplished >>> and where can I change it? >> >> >> >> I'm thinking if you put an underscore _before

Re: Movable, customizable toolbars.

JTK wrote: > [Who the fuck cares what he wrote] Die.

Re: Filtering / Message rules better in Outlook Express?

David Tenser wrote: > Yes, it's obvious that Mozilla's aim is to make a near-perfect, secure > webpage renderer. Gecko is the heart of it all. First of all David, Please stop feeding the troll. You probably just subscribed to these newsgroups/lists, but I've been here long enough to tell you th

Re: Try Famizilla sidebar tab!!!! Nueva Famizilla Sidebar Tab!!!!

Lancer wrote: > A new sidebar is avaliable for mozilla funs!!!, you can find it here: > Una nueva Sidebar esta disponible para los Fanaticos de Mozilla!!!, > puedes encontrarla aqui: > http://www.geocities.com/charadew/ > Why do you spam these newsgroups so often?

Re: Movable, customizable toolbars.

David Tenser wrote: > Hehe.. I thought it would be easier for the people who actually make > changes to the code to also write down what they did. > When they commit their changes to CVS, they enter a message. The ones you see through bonsai or through CVS directly.

Re: Try Famizilla sidebar tab!!!! Nueva Famizilla Sidebar Tab!!!!

Peter Lairo wrote: > i, at least, like to hear about othr moz sites. ;) > > Well. Me too, but not the same site posted every other day =)

Re: Netscape email on Mozilla browser

cl wrote: > When I try to access my Netscape email account using the latest build > of Mozilla's browser, I get a connot connect to server message. This > email still works fine in Netscape 6.21. Addresses are the same in > both as Mozilla just picked up my Netscape email accounts, > preferences.

Re: Printing Address Band Bookmark Files

Kermit & Barbara wrote: > I am attempting to make a printed copy of my address book and > bookmarks---I am using Netscape 4.75. I am able to get titles of > bookmarks printed, but not the address that could be typed into the > location space on the home page. > > Thanks in advance for yo

Re: proxy configuration

parv wrote: > that is interesting. > > junkbuster 2.0.2_1, compiled from freebsd ports, works as expected > while "HTTP/1.1" is being defined in "debug - networking - http > version" in mozilla 0.9.8,1 (also compiled from freebsd ports). > > - parv > > search bugzilla for 'junkbuster'. olde

Re: 0.9.8-Composer problem

Max Bentz wrote: > It seems, that I can not manage to create a "relative"-link (though I > ticked the button "URL is relative to page location") with 0.9.8 > composer. After saving my html-page and re-open the page with the > browser, a look at the "view page source" (or any other editor) alway

Re: Look at that

Jonas Jørgensen wrote: > Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: > >> If you discontinue the Mail list deal and place Mozilla on a Secure News >> server you'd only something like that maybe once every two or three >> years instead once every two or three post. > > > The spam filter bug (http://bugzilla

Re: freetype support?

George Lefter wrote: > hello. > i would like very much to have freetype/antialiasing in mozilla. > i've been watching bug 116147 on freetype, but it is almost a week since > it was fixed and i see no difference. > > what i have done: > installed XFree86 4.2.0. > configured mozilla with --enable-

Re: freetype support?

George Lefter wrote: > hello. > i would like very much to have freetype/antialiasing in mozilla. > i've been watching bug 116147 on freetype, but it is almost a week since > it was fixed and i see no difference. > Also see n.p.m.unix Chstopher Blizzard posted some information about anti-aliased

Re: Can't type into a second instance of Moz. Is this a bug?

ada pascal wrote: > If you open Moz and then minimize it and open another Moz you cant type > into any pages with text entry boxes. With MS IE you can. > > Is this a bug or a feature? > > Definitely a bug. You forgot the most important thing: Release/build number.

Re: linux java plugin

John Michael Norvell wrote: > I don't really understand what I'm being asked to download and install > for JRE 1.3. I installed the java runtime environment when I installed > Linux (SuSE 7.3). Is the plugin the whole JRE again or just a plugin to > work with Mozilla/Netscape 6? > > John Norvell

Re: can't (permanently) modify bookmarks

dman84 wrote: >> this has been the case for me also... never have been able to delete >> bookmarks... regardless of the build of mozilla i've used... using >> 2002022308 at the moment... later/more recent nightlies don't let me >> send mail at all... >> > > make sure if you are using a profile

Re: No need to thank me

JTK wrote: > You'll notice that my bitching finally got AOL to add the two-line > "percent complete in the download progress box title" fix that I posted > a while back. > Die.

Re: Mozilla .9.9 released for Windows

Bundy wrote: > Mozilla looks like is going in the wrong direction. The early builds of > .9.8 were much better. The mail-news focus bug is horrible. 1.0 is going > to be way off in the future > > --Kyle > What are you talking about? Mozilla 0.9.9 has not been released yet.

Re: Mozilla .9.9 released for Windows

Bundy wrote: > "Jay Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >>On 03/05/2002 10:07 PM, Bundy wrote: >> >>>Mozilla looks like is going in the wrong direction. The early builds of >>>.9.8 were much better. The mail-news focus bug is horrible. 1.0

Re: 0.9.8 Minimize/restore issue

Mark wrote: > High all, > > Using the win32 version of 0.9.8 for a couple days now. I have just > noticed some odd behavior though. When I click the minimiz button, Moz > doesn't minimize. It's strange. If I have multiple programs running > with their windows displayed, then clicking on the mi

Re: Full screen in Mozilla

Parish wrote: > Stewart hector wrote: > >> I've seen alot of posts about "full screen" mode. >> >> Unless i'm very blind - I can't find this anywhere in Mozilla. >> > > View->Full Screen or just hit F11 Question is from a linux user. There's no full screen mode under linux. The new implementat

Re: Full screen in Mozilla

Travis Crump wrote: > Just out of curiosity, how do you get out of it short of closing the > browser window? javascript:window.fullScreen=false doesn't do anything. > I have a restore button in the upper right corner

Re: More reasons not to download Netscape 6.2.1 - wait until nextrelease!!

Netscape Basher wrote: > If you download it with the Real Player option, the Real Player it gives > is out of date. Another 8 megs to download!! > > blah > > blah > > blah > > blah blah blah > blah blah blah > > blah blah > > blah > blah > > blah > > blah > > blah > > We need to slai

Re: ftp.mozilla.org really lagging bad , are there mirror sites fortonights nightlies?

Netscape Basher wrote: > Are there mirror sites besides ftp.mozilla.org? > > I just downloaded the nightlies and had a hell of time getting them > downloaded and I have broadband. Shows a lot of interest in the > "official" release of .9.9 > > Which is good. > > -- > Kyle > Netscape's hardes

Re: why is PSM not installed by default?

Jonathan Wilson wrote: > I notice a lot of people that post in various places saying "https > doesnt work", "I cant get to xyz secure site" etc etc and half the time > its because they didnt know that PSM needed to be installed. > Why isnt it installed by default? > At the very least, more needs

Re: 0.9.9 can't open site which 0.9.8 could ?

Max Bentz wrote: > Hi, > > just installed 0.9.9 and checked my online-banking-site here in Germany > ( The site is http://www.sparkasse-ac.de )... big problem: > with the realease 0.9.8 I have no problems at all, 0.9.9 can't open the > site, it stays blank with no comment (but there is a lot of a

Re: 0.9.9 can't open site which 0.9.8 could ?

Kryptolus wrote: > Max Bentz wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> just installed 0.9.9 and checked my online-banking-site here in Germany >> ( The site is http://www.sparkasse-ac.de )... big problem: >> with the realease 0.9.8 I have no problems at all, 0.9.9 can't

Re: Moz .9.9 Lost tabbed browsing? Help?

Richard wrote: > Hello, > > I uninstalled .9.8 and loaded .9.9 tabbed browsing function is now > "messed" up > If I go to the preferences an uncheck the boxes for tabbed browsing a > single tab appears in the navigator, no addittional tabs appear. If I > check the boxes, the single tab disappe

Re: Anti-aliased fonts in Mozilla Unix: does it really work?

Joao Rodrigues wrote: > I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts as > well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla render > fonts as elegantly as Konqueror. > > But, despite following the instructions carefully > (http://www.mozilla.org/pr

Re: 0.9.9 can't open site which 0.9.8 could ?

Yeh You-Ying wrote: > > > It may be the same issue while visiting http://www.dcview.com.tw > JavaScript issue ? I don't see anything wrong with the page.

Re: truetype support under linux; only bold fonts?

Torgeir Veimo wrote: > I'm using the nightly from march 11th. All fonts rendered with the > freetype font support appear bold, if I'm not using antialiasing. Have > anyone else seen this? > yes. i see this. http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130465

Re: Listing by thread won't work in descending order

Rupert James wrote: > Sorry if this is old news, and I don't know if this is a reported bug, > but I felt I should at least mention it. > Try clicking on the Speech Bubble icon next to the Subject column.

Re: Listing by thread won't work in descending order

Rupert James wrote: > Sorry, I didn't explain myself properly. When you group posts together > by thread (say, by clicking on the speech bubble icon), and then click > on Date in order to get posts to be listed in a different order > (specifically, with the newest posts at the top), the thread

Re: File selectors have no parent (..) button !!?

Martin Brown wrote: > This really sucks!! > > The file selectors in 0.9.9 do not have a parent (..) button to go up a > directory in the tree. If this isn't an oversight, someone needs to go > back to UI design 101. > > And don't tell to use the drop down to start at the top of the tree is >

Re: mozilla 0.9.9 crashes

jukola wrote: > > > > No, I'm a user. I still don't understand why Mozilla need the name of my > computer, the brand of my printer etc. to file a "talkback". > > Your CPU, speed, and other > >> software running can *cause* the crash. > > > A printer is *not* a software, nor is a CPU. >

Re: mozilla 0.9.9 crashes

jukola wrote: > Sören Kuklau wrote: > >> On 3/15/2002 11:47 PM, jukola apparently wrote exactly the following: >> >>> DeMoN LaG wrote: >>> Your CPU, speed, and other software running can *cause* the crash. >>> >>> >> >>> A printer is *not* a software, nor is a CPU. >> >> >> >> ...and a

Re: mozilla 0.9.9 crashes

jukola wrote: > > I responded to a "Sören Kuklau" , not you. I have, most likely, replied > you already. > No. You did not reply to me already. Trolls have a tendency to ignore facts. Is that so? I say it again. Read my reply.

Re: mozilla 0.9.9 crashes

jukola wrote: > Kryptolus wrote: > >> jukola wrote: >> >>> >>> I responded to a "Sören Kuklau" , not you. I have, most likely, >>> replied you already. >>> >> >> >> No. You did not reply to me already. >&

Re: Moz displays form fields to fat?

Sid Vicious wrote: > I go to this page in IE and Moz and get to wildly different looks. > Anyone know why? IE looks fine, and Moz looks funked out (too fat fields). > > http://www.benway.com/misc/Dragonguys.html > > You're experiencing http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33654

Re: Mozilla 0.9.9 & Drudge Report

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: > > Glenn Miller wrote: > ---snip--- > >>And besides, boasting of such "certification" only makes you look like an >>ego-centered bozo, IMHO. >> >>Can you understand my point, Phil'? >> >>Glenn Miller >> >>-- >>"What some people have a

Re: Moz displays form fields to fat?

Sid Vicious wrote: > > I don't know. Seems like *glaring* bugs such as this would be fixed > *months* before now. *And* it's still going to be present in 1.0. > Someone takes pains to lay a page out that is tight and consise, only to > have Moz trash it thusly. Seems like the Moz crew bit of

Re: Repeat after me....(another tirade on Mozilla cookie handling)

psmith wrote: >Your downloading and checking out Cookie Pal was most appreciated. > Thanks for helping to explain what you see as the problem that Mozilla > has in receiving information about cookies from Windows messages. I > guess at this point the main hope for my request is that enough

Re: issues w/ NScape 6.1

Christopher Jahn wrote: > > > Mostly security patches, but 6.2.2 is using the 0.9.9 gecko > engine!! For pehaps the first time Netscape 6.xx is almost at a > par with Mozilla! > You sure it uses 0.9.9? The page says "For more information about specific issues, read the latest related Mozi

Re: issues w/ NScape 6.1

Dan Howard wrote: > > > Kryptolus C.L. wrote: > >> Christopher Jahn wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Mostly security patches, but 6.2.2 is using the 0.9.9 gecko engine!! >>> For pehaps the first time Netscape 6.xx is almost at a par with Mo

Re: How big is Mozilla now?

Colin Blake wrote: > Can someone on a fast machine count up how many lines of C, C++, XUL, > JavaScript, etc Mozilla is now? > http://kryptolus.com/report.txt [Warning: might be very inaccurate]

Re: problems with a web site

Brad Walker wrote: > I am having a problem with a website and it's mozilla related. I hope > this is the proper forum and if not, then please excuse my ignorance. > I would have filed a bug report via bugzilla but it was a little difficult > seeing as how all I wanted to do was file 1 bug report.

Re: problems with a web site

Kryptolus C.L. wrote: > > This already has been fixed. Download a nightly and it should display fine. > If you're interested: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124637

Re: How big is Mozilla now?

Olaf Titz wrote: > These are numbers on 0.9.9 from sloccount > (http://www.dwheeler.com/sloccount/) > Looks like it doesn't count XUL however. > > read my above reply with my report form slooccount that counts xul/xml/etc

Re: bug in Mozilla 0.9.9: OSCP error

Eric Stieglitz wrote: > Whenever I connect to http://www.mbnanetaccess.com and a number of other > sites, I get the following error from Mozilla: > > "Error trying to validate certificate from www.mbnanetaccess.com using > OSCP - corrupted or unknown response. Error Code: -8073." > > I'm runnin

Re: bug in Mozilla 0.9.9: OSCP error

Eric Stieglitz wrote: > "Kryptolus C.L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > >>Eric Stieglitz wrote: >> >>>Whenever I connect to http://www.mbnanetaccess.com and a number of other >>>sites, I get the f

Re: Warum hat Mozilla 0.9.9 so viele neue Bugs? Ein Sabotuer?

Sören Kuklau wrote: > On 3/25/2002 12:24 AM, Bamm Gabriana apparently wrote exactly the > following: > >> I made a mistake, I meant let a=1 instead of let a=b. > > > Yup... Hmm... I gotta show that to my maths teacher after holidays. > I hope your teacher doesn't laugh at you =) http://math

Re: Warum hat Mozilla 0.9.9 so viele neue Bugs? Ein Sabotuer?

Sören Kuklau wrote: > On 3/25/2002 12:13 AM, Bamm Gabriana apparently wrote exactly the > following: > >>> That's like declaring that 1=2. >> >> >> >> It is. >> >> Let a=b. >> a^2 = a (multiply both sides by a) > > > That's only true for a=1 or a=0. > >> a^2 - 1 = a - 1 (subtract 1 from both

Re: Blaargh [Was: blabla ZDNet blabla]

Morten Nilsen wrote: > Your subscription request wrote: > >> Request received at: ZDNet.com >> Time of request: Tue Mar 26 15:11:08 2002 EST >> IP address received: 63.36.222.4 > > > muahaha... we have his IP and time of day! > Remote operating system guess: Windows NT4 / Win95 / Win98

Re: Blaargh [Was: blabla ZDNet blabla]

DeMoN LaG wrote: > "Kryptolus C.L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Mar 2002: > > >>Remote operating system guess: Windows NT4 / Win95 / Win98 > > > What's this guess based on? > os fingerprinting based on network stack responses