Kyle,
On the day when AOL releases software to their end-users uses Mozilla Gecko
will you go away and stop trolling here?
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:43:40 GMT esteemed Netscape Basher did hold forth
thusly:
Blake Ross typed:
A browser shift by AOL is going to leave an awful lot of companies
On Fri, 08 Mar 2002 23:35:25 GMT esteemed Netscape Basher did hold forth
thusly:
a whole bunch of snipped complaints
Well Basher Bundy, my suggestion is that you don't use NS 6.21 and stop
complaining about it.
I think Moz is maturing very nicely. Since about Moz v0.97 I've found it is
a
Running NT4 SP6a. I upgraded from v0.98 to the latest Win32 nighties
in pub/mozilla/nightly/2002-02-18-06-trunk and then many (but not all)
of the bookmarks were unresponsive to left or right clicks. I then
tried backing up 1 day and then even further back to 2002021510. Still
the same problem.
On Sat, 09 Feb 2002 12:12:53 +0100 esteemed Jonas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F8rgensen?= did
hold forth thusly:
That would be a nice solution.
...which is exactly what
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52821 is about.
See the comment I posted in that bug listing some ways to
deal with
On 8 Feb 2002 06:01:39 GMT esteemed DeMoN LaG did hold forth thusly:
Middle click the tab, use File, Close Tab, or click the X on the right
side of the screen that closes tabs.
I don't want the overhead of moving my hand to the mouse, moving the mouse
to the X and then clicking it. I want
On Fri, 08 Feb 2002 12:44:08 +0200 esteemed George Lefter did hold forth
thusly:
how about a confirmation dialog box when quitting?
and a checkbox somewhere in Edit-Preferences to enable/disable it
That would be a nice solution.
Reported bugs can be going up while total bugs are going down. Just because
they are getting reported now doesn't mean they didn't exist a year or two
earlier.
In my own experience Mozilla is progressing incredibly well. It runs
continuously 24x7 for me for days. I rarely shut down my
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 13:15:14 -0500 esteemed Nigel L did hold forth thusly:
Many will be aware of a war being waged by AOL against an alternative
chat/messaging client. This is at the same time AOL launches legal
proceedings for anti-competitive practices...
Well, they are funding an open
I misread your subject title and thought it said B5 as in Babylon 5.
Who cares about the fools that complain? My advice is tell all your
friends to use Mozilla, send them a link to a download page, and doing
that will do more to help the situation than complaining about foolish
commentators.
Maybe there is already a way to do one or two of these and
I just don't know about it:
1) A qualified click (eg Ctrl-Shift-Click is what Opera uses) that will
open a new URL in a new tab and NOT give that new tab focus.
2) Have Moz save all the current tab URLs and then be able to exit
and
On 27 Jan 2002 05:29:48 GMT esteemed DeMoN LaG did hold forth thusly:
1) A qualified click (eg Ctrl-Shift-Click is what Opera uses) that
will open a new URL in a new tab and NOT give that new tab focus.
Edit, Preferences, Navigator, Tabbed Browsing, Load links in background
Yeah, I get
Using Moz build 2001110703 build on NT4 SP6a.
One thing I like about IE is that when one selects a piece of a page and
then you paste the page into some other place it pastes in the URLs that
were embedded in the copied text.
Occasionally I see some URLs get copied over. But usually not ones
I see in here:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/
builds that are OTIS rather than trunk.
What are they for?
Is there any work done to try to track whether Mozilla's memory leakage
is becoming better or worse and by how much?
Is it desired by the testers and developers to find test cases to
demonstrate memory leak causes? Or are there already enough such test
cases?
Anyone see that Moz's memory
On 21 Sep 2001 08:47:32 GMT esteemed David Gerard did hold forth thusly:
Definitely. Its main problem is that its arse is incredibly fat - takes a
bucket of memory and CPU, and leaks memory horribly (much less than
previously, though). Nevertheless, it's my primary browser.
I agree about the
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:48:58 + (UTC) esteemed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] did hold forth thusly:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77675
Brandon,
Thanks for the URL. I just added my vote and encourage others to do likewise.
Anyone else want to verify this? I'm running NT4 SP6a.
If I start up Moz and then go directly to http://linuxtoday.com it does not
crash. But if go to, for instance. http://www.theinquirer.net/ and
http://www.theregister.co.uk/ and open a bunch of windows (about 15 will do
it - right click
Anyone else noticed how advertisement URls have been showing up in the URL
window instead of the correct URL for the page?
I'm guessing that the various other links within a page are being put in the
URL window as they are loaded. Or maybe Javascript page shifting that is done
beneath the
On Thu, 17 May 2001 13:25:07 -0700 esteemed Jeffrey W. Baker did'st hold
forth thusly:
Am I the only one who finds the nightlies unusable? I download them
faithfully, but they crash within a few moments of launch. I've reverted
to 0.9 with galeon...
They work well for me in most cases.
On Thu, 17 May 2001 20:10:55 +0200 esteemed Peter Lairo did'st hold forth
thusly:
sorry about the caps, but i'm hoping on getting some attention to this
matter - and trying to see if others are having similar problems ;)
Peter,
What does Latest Nightlies mean? For me at this moment that
Running NT4 Sp6a.
For the last several days I've been getting an error on start-up for Moz
daily builds. I just tried the latest one 2001051308 for today and ditto:
The procedure entry
point?IndexOf@nsStringArray@@QBEHABV?$basic_nsAReadableString@G@@@Z could not
be located in in the
On Sun, 13 May 2001 23:39:16 +0200 esteemed Fabian Guisset did'st hold forth
thusly:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71010
The only way to make this bug disappear currently is to
1) Uninstall Mozilla using the uninstall panel of Windows (standard
Add/Remove Program procedure)
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 01:40:28 -0500 esteemed NeTDeMoN did'st hold forth
thusly:
Why don't you upgrade to NS6.01?
My guess is that it is behind Moz 0.8.
I'm currently running a post Moz 0.8 daily build from Thurs Mar 8 2001.
Running the daily builds is fun. See:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:29:16 -0600 esteemed Steve did'st hold forth
thusly:
I frequently play around with new builds of Mozilla on Linux, MacOS,
and Win9x systems. I would delete or rename the old Mozilla folder,
unpack a newer build in its place, and let the new build access the
same user
I just took Netscape v6 and Moz v0.8 thru the exact same series of web
pages. Netscape v6 used 21 CPU seconds and Moz v0.8 used 16 seconds.
It appears from this result that Moz 0.8 uses about 3/4 the CPU that NS 6
uses.
Just installed Moz 0.8 on NT4 SP6a. Brought it up and it is snappy and
stable. However, the Nav Toolbar does not show the URL of the current
page. That part of the toolbar is just solid grey with no sign that a
control is supposed to go there.
View|Toolbars has all 3 toolbars in the list
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:45:19 -0800 esteemed Randall Parker did'st hold
forth thusly:
Just installed Moz 0.8 on NT4 SP6a. Brought it up and it is snappy and
stable. However, the Nav Toolbar does not show the URL of the current
page. That part of the toolbar is just solid grey with no sign
27 matches
Mail list logo
