Richard Kilgore wrote:
Joao Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:a6mcd9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts as
well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla render
fonts as elegantly as Konqueror.
Joao Rodrigues wrote:
I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts as
well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla render
fonts as elegantly as Konqueror.
But, despite following the instructions carefully
I'm using the nightly from march 11th. All fonts rendered with the
freetype font support appear bold, if I'm not using antialiasing. Have
anyone else seen this?
--
-Torgeir
Holger Metzger wrote:
Phil Sweeney schrieb:
Microsoft ClearType is only for LCD monitors (otherwise it is just
blurry and most likely bad for your eyes).
I have cleartype enabled on my XP. It's wonderful. Not blurry at all.
Is it enabled by default? Where can one set it up explicitly?
Pratik wrote:
On 01/17/02 06:45 AM, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
rkaa wrote:
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
What happened to the possibility to print in A4 under linux?
It *was* there, now it's gone. And they call this progress?
Did you check the properties button?
Of course. I lets me select
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
Pratik wrote:
On 01/17/02 06:45 AM, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
rkaa wrote:
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
What happened to the possibility to print in A4 under linux?
It *was* there, now it's gone. And they call this progress?
Did you check the properties button
What happened to the possibility to print in A4 under linux?
It *was* there, now it's gone. And they call this progress?
--
-Torgeir
rkaa wrote:
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
What happened to the possibility to print in A4 under linux?
It *was* there, now it's gone. And they call this progress?
Did you check the properties button?
Of course. I lets me select color or grayscale and the printer command.
Nothing else
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
What in particular makes 4.x better than 6 for the users?
Also, given that netscape is focused on netscape 6, why do they still
even bother to support 4.x?
Rant answer; mozilla focuses on functionality, not usability.
--
-Torgeir
Justin H. wrote:
Not to mention my favorite missing perq, the ability to view open
connections and the URI they're waiting for - ctrl+alt+t on windows/*ix,
not sure on a mac...command+ctrl+t?
Or the fact that I press 'g' in a newsgroup view to mark all messages as
read and advance to the
Whenever I go to the norwegian newspaper page www.ba.no with mozilla
(0.9.3, 0.9.4) under mandrake 8.1 linux, mozilla allways changes the
character coding to unicode (utf-8) which is not correct.
This does not happen on 0.9.4 under windows.
--
- Torgeir
The discussion forums at pdabuzz are rendered very weird, and has been
so for the recent months. Check it out;
http://www2.pdabuzz.com/Forums/showthread.php?s=threadid=23987
--
- Torgeir
Is this a buggy asynchronous dns thingy?
--
- Torgeir
What is this war room effort I keep seeing referenced on the status
pages now and then?
--
- Torgeir
Now even mail-news autoraises when a newsgroup has finished loading...
--
- Torgeir
Peter Lairo wrote:
try a recent nightly build (or maybe even milestone 0.9.3) - it was fixed.
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
I really hate IE for autoraising IE windows when a new URL is loaded,
but recently mozilla has started to behave even worse in this respect.
Is there any option to turn
I really hate IE for autoraising IE windows when a new URL is loaded,
but recently mozilla has started to behave even worse in this respect.
Is there any option to turn this feature off?
--
- Torgeir
Or is there any new functionality pending for 1.0?
--
- Torgeir
I have seen a change in the selection in the latest nightly. I don't
know when the change happened, but it was probably before milestone 0.9.
The images at http://nothome.com/select1.gif and images at
http://nothome.com/select2.gif illustrates my point.
When you select text in the browser, when
On pdabuzz the forums are rendered very weird with the latest nightly.
See http://www2.pdabuzz.com/Forums/showthread.php?s=threadid=18715
Don't know if this is a bug in the design though.
--
- Torgeir
Alfred Kayser wrote:
http://members.tripod.lycos.nl/AKayser/skins/themes.htm
Ahh! This goes right into my bookmark file!
Try it out, and let me know what you think.
The LittleMozilla theme is very nice!
--
- Torgeir
Bart Meerdink wrote:
It would probably be a good business proposition for AOL/TW to let
Mozilla find its own course with less pressure, buy Opera Software A/S,
and let them customize Opera to get the top-quality browser they so long
waited for.
Is this a troll to raise the stock value
If there was one single feature which would really be of help to all
those souls that runs prerelease mozilla just to help spot bugs, it must
have been the
ABILITY TO RUN MULTIPLE SIMULTANEOUS INSTANCES OF MOZILLA INSTEAD OF ONE
SINGLE FUCKING CRASHING ONE!
This would really, really, really,
Eyes to the Skies. wrote:
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
If there was one single feature which would really be of help to all
those souls that runs prerelease mozilla just to help spot bugs, it must
have been the
ABILITY TO RUN MULTIPLE SIMULTANEOUS INSTANCES OF MOZILLA INSTEAD OF ONE
Daniel Veditz wrote:
The timebomb didn't delete the software, it simply started nagging people to
upgrade from a beta version. Hasn't been used since Netscape betas, and
judging by the fact that we still get talkback crashes reported from PR1
builds (over a year old) I'd say it was
Yesterday at home I noted that the nightly builds for windows were back
with some dated march 20th.
Today the date is march the 16th again. Were they removed? And when are
the windows nightly build back on a regular basis?
--
- Torgeir
And it came to pass that NeTDeMoN wrote:
Mozilla is so fast now (at least in Windows) that this is not
really necessary. The effort that goes into this should
instead go into making performance enhancements especially on
Window loading and startup. I recommend marking this WONTFIX.
A much
Not rendering any background for unloaded pages / frames / iframes is
simply very ugly, annoying, unprofessional, and downright
user-unfriendly.
Does it really has to be this way?
--
- Torgeir
Have you tried the workaround by copying the MPOJI600.dll file from the
java bin directory into the mozilla plugins directory?
--
- Torgeir
Are you using a skin? Did you delete the entire mozilla/bin directory
and try to start with a fresh install with a user that uses the skin
that was previously under the bin directory?
--
- Torgeir
Daniel Veditz wrote:
If he's talking about form auto-fill, there's a preference to turn it off
available on the preferences dialog.
There's no way for a *site* author to turn it off, though. Not sure if
that's a good or bad idea. It would help folks too stupid to think saving a
credit card
Kent Perrier wrote:
I have finally upgraded from NS4.7X to Mozilla and I have gotten everything
working except the Java 1.3.0_01 plug-in. I have installed it from the the
SDK and I have installed it from the Netscape plugin finder page. In both
cases, the plugin does not show up when I do
32 matches
Mail list logo
