TomMallard wrote:
With 150,000,000 users, this is a nightmare. How many of them do you think
are going to even try to fix this unless AOL pushes it on them?
The article says aol is doing a serverside fix.
Andreas J. wrote:
Hi there
Often (not everytime) i close mozilla
i get an errormessage (look at attached screenshot).
This happen since milestone 0.9.5
I use the german-takback-zip versions from http://www.kairo.at/
The error happens on different windows-machines,
even with a new
This link was just posted on slashdot.org
It details a security hole in Aol Instant Messenger
http://www.w00w00.org/advisories/aim.html
And it's nice to know...
Inline AIM in Netscape is not vulnerable
And yet you still can't provide a working test case for it. It's a
pity. Have you tried deleting \cache yet like I told you to 3 days ago?
He still hasn't seen that request. Wait one more day ;)
Sorry.
Brian West wrote:
Is spell check implemented in current nightly builds? If so I am unable
to use it, is there something I can download. If it is not can someome
give be a bug #.
Thanks
This message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news://news.mozilla.org:119/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Was posted at 9:56
Magnus W wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Trillian is great but it takes up even more fricken ram than ICQ. Sure
I get all the extra protocols, but I don't want all of em. Anyone know
of one that does ICQ and AIM (which doesn't get locked out
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Nigel L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 28 Dec 2001:
snip a bunch of HTML
You could always try Trillian, it connects to AIM, ICQ, MSN, Yahoo and
ICQ
You forgot irc.
Trillian is great but it takes up even more fricken ram
petern wrote:
Hi.
I've made a little DHTML page to test the performance of DHTML in Mozilla.
You can have a look at it here: http://www.formula-one.nu/dhtml/moz3d.htm
It's quite sluggish but hopefully the DHTML performance in Mozilla will be
better someday.. :)
/petern
Don't set the
Very KOOL! Works fine at timeout 1 on my WinMoz 0.9.7 milestone PIII
850 notebook. :-)
Sure, you have 850MHz, mozilla can keep up on your computer... but on my
350 it doesn't have a chance.
Nope, it's possible. You just have to do the work.
Mozilla currently renders it's own controls so all it uses are the basic
drawing routines. It currently uses GTK on linux, but it doesn't use
GTK's scroll bars, it just draws it's own.
S. Merde wrote:
So I take it by the lack of comments
Anyways, I searched bugzilla and couldn't find the bug number. Anyone
have it? This is on build 2001122003 I've got the screenshots to prove
it ;)
Ugh, I just read through all of those painfully annoying messages posted
by jtk and noticed he didn't file a bug report, so I filed one.
shevek wrote:
Someone please implement this:
I would like to be able to elect to have PRE formatted text wrapped
to fit in the window.
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16909
I worked a little on this, but need some help to finish off the feature.
Also please put TEXT
Ian Thomas wrote:
Fred Figueiredo wrote:
After this I call a funcion that does:
main.document.t.value=hello;
...
Is t an element (ie using document.all)? If so, you should be doing
main.document.getElementById('t').value=hello;
Ian
He didn't give the input tag an id. He
Gregory Spath wrote:
In the last few nightlies I've downloaded, Mozilla has the VERY IRRITATING habit
of automatically raising itself after a page has finished loading.
Is there a way to make this behavior stop?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114930
This bug needs to be
Peter Lairo wrote:
Bob Davis wrote:
I still use individual browser windows because I can use the kb to
alt-tab between windows. There is no kb interface for tabs or is
there? I have tried:
1. ctrl-esc (msdev, word, etc)
2. ctrl-tab (?)
3. ctrl-leftarrow(?)
4. move focus to tab strip
Joni K. wrote:
Fabian Schach wrote:
Focus stealing has never been a feature, it was a bug, but it is fixed.
It definitely does not happen on Windows 98 anymore. You should try
Mozilla 0.9.6 or a newer build, and maybe you should create and use a
new profile. If the problems don't go away
WDA wrote:
If you go to the following page -
http://weather.noaa.gov/fax/surface.shtml#sfconus and download Plot No.
1, under North America, you will find the file name on your hard drive
but with zero bytes - the file will be empty. I went over and used IE
to see if perhaps there was
jdavis wrote:
http://www.abit-usa.com/
Immediately the browser pretty much freezes though the page continues to
load and finishes loading, but no interaction is possible after.
This is an important page to me... can anyone take a look?
Regards.
99% CPU usage and when I right
mAineAc wrote:
You haven't correctly entered the server:
For RECEIVING mail, it's POP.MAIL.YAHOO.COM
For SENDING mail, it's SMTP.MAIL.YAHOO.COM
I am talking about on the website not in the email program. I can't log
into the email page the link for sign in will not work and the
Frank Burleigh wrote:
I've noted that quite a few sites I visit now have their own icon in the
location box, to the left of the URL. I saw some reference to this in
the checkins once but assumed this must be an authoring issue. Yet I do
not see page content controlling this. How is it
Steve Mitchell wrote:
My first try at this version was 6.1 and my mouse wheel won't work.
I've since upgraded to 6.2 and still no joy. I have tried both system
default and manual line scroll in preferences with no luck. The mouse
wheeel works fine in all my other applications and with
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
What in particular makes 4.x better than 6 for the users?
For me I use nav 4 for mail and moz for browsing, irc and newsgroups
(when it isn't broken). Everyone else in my house doesn't trust
netscape 6.2 yet so they continue to use nav4.
My friends use IE as opposed
jdavis wrote:
When preloaded using Quick Launch, it seems to take 3/4's of a second
to load on my system, whereas every other build was about twice that. I
haven't turned this into a scientific study, but I'm virtually positive
it is quite a bit faster. Anyone else noticing a
[1] no doubt people will correct me if I'm talking bollocks.
The HP PhotoSmart 1000 printer comes with a print preview function.
:)
Since when has mozilla been able to read bmp files? I noticed it last
night when a friend came over and he was checking out desktop images.
The bmp started loading very slowly from the bottom up.
Is this getting ready for the save as wallpaper function or something?
Stug wrote:
Where is the cache files stored in 6.1 under XP?
If XP is like Windows2k then it will most likely be located in
C:\Documents and Settings\user\Application
Data\Mozilla\Users50\default\salt.slt\Cache
by default.
Scott wrote:
thier site doesn't work with my Mozilla browser despite reports that
they've opened this back up to other browsers...perhaps because I'm
using Linux?
I just read the C|Net article and went to the page using Windows 2000
and the latest nightly build. I still get the error.
Pratik wrote:
Try validationg www.msn.com with w3c's validator. Even their Upgrade
your browser page has errors in it!
Check out Opera's press release
http://www.opera.com/pressreleases/20011026.html
Mozilla should make one too.
Heh, I like the little notes at the bottom, read
If you want to modify it the file is called pref-policies.xul and you
can just uncomment out the treeitem / code in preftree.xul to see it.
There is no such file pref-policies.xul on my system. Now what?
Do you have the latest nightly? Have you extracted comm.jar?
Martin Poirier wrote:
Can you please explain to me what must be removed to uncomment. I'm not
a programmer but I found the file you mentionned and read it, but after
many tries, I didn't succeed in adding this panel. (I tried removing all
!, then all '?', then all / but nothing worked.)
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
Is it because no-one has yet made a preferences dialog feature for it?
Where in the code/xul/etc would I need to start in order to make such a
GUI.
I looked into it the other day (If you know any JavaScript, grab patch
maker, it makes modifying mozilla's ui code
Colin Thefleau wrote:
I do a small test to find out which browser renders better and under which
environment. This is very simple and only takes care of text now. I think
the results will also interest the mozilla users. Basically eight partial
pages are grouped into one picture, you have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Apols if this is the wrong group, how do I install a nightly build on
Win32? there appears to be no install.exe, setup.exe or script.
Sounds like you got the zip version. In that case, all you have to do
I just filed this bug on the issue. I think OJI was the correct place
to file it but I'm not sure.
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102729
Jay Garcia wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone else have mozilla lockup when it loads a flash or java
applet? I've just had to kill build 2001092703 five times in the last
10 minutes.
I don't know exactly what it is, but it's making it really hard to use
(I don't normally browse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Apols if this is the wrong group, how do I install a nightly build on
Win32? there appears to be no install.exe, setup.exe or script.
Thanks
Sounds like you got the zip version. In that case, all you have to do
is extract the zip and run mozilla.exe. If
It doesn't really matter which URL. Here's a good one...
http://www.maedastudio.com/
Just go to the sub pages with the java applets and flash documents.
The only problems encountered on that entire site were the Java
applets that didn't work because of non-recognition of the JRE that
Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't really matter which URL. Here's a good one...
http://www.maedastudio.com/
[...]
This is in Win2k under build 2001092703.
Same here, except it's winMe, Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90;
en-US; rv:0.9.4+)
Erik Harris wrote:
Yet another bug in Mozilla:
http://www.qool.com/root/index.jsp
The graphics at the top and left are supposed to be continuous (and are in
both Netscape 4 and IE 5), but in Mozilla, they have white stripes separating
the elements.
It's probably not a bug. It may be
Scott Kramer wrote:
How does one properly install a plugin with Mozilla? How do you get
around the fact that wherever you go to download a plugin, the site says
that it does not recognize your browser?
I'd like to know the answer too. What I do is keep Nav 4 around,
install it in
Does anyone else have mozilla lockup when it loads a flash or java
applet? I've just had to kill build 2001092703 five times in the last
10 minutes.
I don't know exactly what it is, but it's making it really hard to use
(I don't normally browse through flash/java heavy sites so this normally
41 matches
Mail list logo
