Okay you are the idiot who demanded the developers rewite some of the
download dialogue box since you didn't like how it worked and buggered
up the Mac build which caused Mac developers a week's worth of
fustration. ;) Thanks. Why don't you take credit for accomplishing
something other than
This is almost not worth posting, but if you check the full header this
newsgroup is hosted at secnews.netscape. End of argument!
Jay Garcia wrote:
On 03/09/2002 6:06 PM, Netscape Basher wrote:
And then they will claim only technical information is supposed to be
posted there. Which
Basher,
No one is complaining that you do not recomend NS 6.2.1. What people are
complaining about is the way you said it. You came across as a basher.
To paraphrase: There is nothing good about NS 6.2.1. Now if you had
simply said Wait for the next version of Netscape, or download Mozilla
Hopefully, and many webmasters wish for this, if iPlanet did produce the
NS 4.7 releases, than iPlanets transfer to Sun may indeed mean the end
of the line for NS 4.7.
Sören Kuklau wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I planet belongs to SUN now.
Weren't the newer Netscape 4.7x versions
James Clash wrote:
Sören Kuklau wrote:
James Clash wrote:
Good to hear - but what I still don't unterstand is the fact that
the regression has been reported on 2001-12-27 and although this
regression is having a great impact it hasn't been fixed for 0.9.8 ?!
Because it's not at all
Maybe one of those switches could be installed as an off switch :) or do
you think a reboot switch might restore his corrupted reasoning
libraries?:-) JTK please go get some help--you need it. Please stop
trolling. I for one an tired of the garbage and flames and hate you type
into this
I have read/heard amny comments as to Mozilla's performance. Many people
claim Mozilla is very slow. I know that DHTML is slow, but other than
that I find Mozilla reasonably fast. But then I am connected to the
internet by a broadband cable connection.
My question is this: Does Mozilla have a
JTK wrote:
Roope Lehmuslehto wrote:
WDA wrote:
Working with Mozilla 0.9.7. Very fast and very nice.
However, MailNews is very buggy, slow and lacks many features...
In fact what's really sad is that the bugginess far outweighs both its
slowness and feature-lackingness *combined*.
