I just discovered (the hard way) that a patch for
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46225 was checked in on
11/19. My pages, which all pass strict validation, ain't got no styles
anymore. :-( Turns out the hosting service has .css files defined as a
content type "text/plain" instead of
kchayka wrote:
> I just discovered (the hard way) that a patch for
> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46225 was checked in on
> 11/19. My pages, which all pass strict validation, ain't got no styles
> anymore. :-( Turns out the hosting service has .css files defined as a
> content ty
> kchayka wrote:
>> I just discovered (the hard way) that a patch for
>> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46225 was checked in on
>> 11/19. My pages, which all pass strict validation, ain't got no styles
>> anymore. :-( Turns out the hosting service has .css files defined as a
>> cont
Ian Thomas wrote:
>> kchayka wrote:
>>> I just discovered (the hard way) that a patch for
>>> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46225 was checked in on
>>> 11/19. My pages, which all pass strict validation, ain't got no styles
>>> anymore. :-( Turns out the hosting service has .css fi
Ian Thomas wrote:
>> kchayka wrote:
>>
>>> I just discovered (the hard way) that a patch for
>>> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46225 was checked in on
>>> 11/19. My pages, which all pass strict validation, ain't got no styles
>>> anymore. :-( Turns out the hosting service has .css
Ian Thomas wrote:
>
>> My host, until recently (yahoo) was using the wrong mime type. I asked
>> them to fix it and they did.
>
> Yahoo as in Yahoo GeoCities? That is a pretty monolithic host and free
> so I surprised that they were so helpful, not that I'm complaining.
There's a pretty co
