JTK wrote:
Garth Wallace wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What I find rather odd is that while many here cry
Mozilla isn't for users!, Netscape 6.x, which is no more than Mozilla
with an AOL sticker on it, is supposed to be the Mozila
Jonas Jørgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Garth Wallace wrote:
Jonas Jørgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Will it be like this forever? Isn't Mozilla at some point going to be
a
Asa Dotzler wrote:
That's fine. Mozilla isn't for the regular users. Regular users should
be looking for Mozilla distributions like Netscape 6.x, Beonex
Communicator, HallZilla, etc. Mozilla.org provided binaries for testing
and development purposes. It's fine with me if users go with
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Asa Dotzler wrote:
That's fine. Mozilla isn't for the regular users. Regular users should
be looking for Mozilla distributions like Netscape 6.x, Beonex
Communicator, HallZilla, etc. Mozilla.org provided binaries for testing
and development purposes. It's fine
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What I find rather odd is that while many here cry
Mozilla isn't for users!, Netscape 6.x, which is no more than Mozilla
with an AOL sticker on it, is supposed to be the Mozila for end users.
Evidently JTK
Garth Wallace wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What I find rather odd is that while many here cry
Mozilla isn't for users!, Netscape 6.x, which is no more than Mozilla
with an AOL sticker on it, is supposed to be the Mozila for
JTK wrote:
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Asa Dotzler wrote:
That's fine. Mozilla isn't for the regular users. Regular users should
be looking for Mozilla distributions like Netscape 6.x, Beonex
Communicator, HallZilla, etc. Mozilla.org provided binaries for testing
and development
Hall Stevenson wrote:
Will it be like this forever? Isn't Mozilla at some
point going to be a browser for regular users as
well?
Yes to #1, no to #2. Mozilla is intended to be
packaged by other companies for the user market.
The builds provided by Mozilla are just for
Yes to #1, no to #2. Mozilla is intended to be
packaged by other companies for the user market.
The builds provided by Mozilla are just for
testing purposes, and will be even post-1.0.
One word: Why?
Because for it to be any other way, Mozilla would require a marketing
department and an
Gervase Markham wrote:
Why don't they release them? Imagine for a moment the massive amount of
bad PR there would be if, say, 1000 people downloaded a build which had
a regression which wiped your profile. Or your hard drive.
I just HATE it when while testing my new WidgetMaker 2002 betas, I
* Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010822 19:35]:
Hall Stevenson wrote:
What's the point of an 'installer' version of mozilla then ?? That
makes it awfully easy for end-users to download and use. I would
think that a re-packager would take care of an installer program for
Hall Stevenson wrote:
snip
My point is: Go to a website that offers links to the various web
browsers. You'll have IE v5.x, Netscape 4.7x, NEtscape 6.1, Opera 5.x,
and mozilla 1.x. To the average user, the higher numbers are better.
mozilla 1.x will likely be the last one they even
JTK wrote:
Garth Wallace wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What I find rather odd is that while many here cry
Mozilla isn't for users!, Netscape 6.x, which is no more than Mozilla
with an AOL sticker on it, is supposed to be the Mozila
Hall Stevenson wrote:
Will it be like this forever? Isn't Mozilla at some
point going to be a browser for regular users as
well?
Yes to #1, no to #2. Mozilla is intended to be
packaged by other companies for the user market.
The builds provided by Mozilla are just for
testing purposes, and will
Hall Stevenson wrote:
* Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010822 19:35]:
Hall Stevenson wrote:
What's the point of an 'installer' version of mozilla then ?? That
makes it awfully easy for end-users to download and use. I would
think that a re-packager would take care of an
On 17 Aug 2001 18:58:34 GMT,
Hall Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Yeap, someone who reads their webserver's log files will see
:that... Wait, joe-user doesn't run a webserver.
:What the general public sees is that they're running Internet
:Explorer v5.x, Netscape v4.xx, or Netscape v6.x. Or
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
...
In my opinion, naming the first final version Mozilla 5.0 will solve
tons of problems and complications, and I can't really see any good
reasons not to. I'm I the only one who thinks this is a good idea?
...
No, you're not the only one.
--
Matthew `mpt' Thomas,
What kind of problems do you mean. I can't think of one.
Matthew Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
...
In my opinion, naming the first final version Mozilla 5.0 will solve
tons of problems and complications, and I
Richter wrote:
Hall Stevenson wrote:
* Jeroen Roeterd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010817 18:57]:
My point is: Go to a website that offers links to the various web
browsers. You'll have IE v5.x, Netscape 4.7x, NEtscape 6.1, Opera
5.x, and mozilla 1.x. To the average user, the higher
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
I think it might be a good idea to consider naming the final version of
Mozilla version 5.0 instead of 1.0. Yes, I know that Netscape 4.0 (which
call itself Mozilla/4.0) and below is only nicknamed Mozilla, and that
the real Mozilla will be the first release to actually
I think it might be a good idea to consider naming the final version of
Mozilla version 5.0 instead of 1.0. Yes, I know that Netscape 4.0 (which
call itself Mozilla/4.0) and below is only nicknamed Mozilla, and that
the real Mozilla will be the first release to actually be named
Mozilla, and of
I think it might be a good idea to consider naming the final version of
Mozilla version 5.0 instead of 1.0. Yes, I know that Netscape 4.0 (which
call itself Mozilla/4.0) and below is only nicknamed Mozilla, and that
the real Mozilla will be the first release to actually be named
Mozilla, and of
22 matches
Mail list logo
