Jeremy M. Dolan wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED], Brendan Eich wrote:
http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.htmlComments welcome.
Brendan,I'd like to see a release candidate period for 1.0 put into place. Inthe past serious bugs have slipped
Amen Jonas. Those are my two worst bugs also.
jon
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Oliver C. wrote:
The last point is, that it still has some problems with showing
websites correctly.
For example Mozilla shows this website not correctly:
http://www.interplay.com/giants/index2.html
(This bug is
Brendan Eich wrote:
http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html
Comments welcome. Questions too, so I might have something to put
Hello,
IMHO Mozilla is not ready for a 1.0 version.
April is too early for 1.0.
There are still some major bugs that still make problems.
For example, text
Oliver C. wrote:
The last point is, that it still has some problems with showing websites
correctly.
For example Mozilla shows this website not correctly:
http://www.interplay.com/giants/index2.html
(This bug is known for about a year, don't know the bug number at the
moment)
Not a
Oliver C. wrote:
Brendan Eich wrote:
http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html
Comments welcome. Questions too, so I might have something to put
Hello,
IMHO Mozilla is not ready for a 1.0 version.
April is too early for 1.0.
That didn't stop them with Netscape 6.0, it ain't gonna
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
The two worst bugs currently in Mozilla, IMHO, is 55583 (view-source
should show original page source) and 46845 (Form elements don't reset
upon reloading page). They both cause very annoying dataloss, and they
are both futured... :-(
After them, standards
Brendan Eich wrote:
http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html
Comments welcome. Questions too, so I might have something to put
Nice job on the graphic! (the last one looked like a 10 year old did it)
--
sid
Brendan Eich wrote:
http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html
Comments welcome. Questions too, so I might have something to put
Great job there. Graphic looks professional too.
You still refer to the original roadmap and to the previous roadmap
though. It should be the original roadmap, the
aah, now I get it.
1.0 is gonna be like the stable branch of the linux kernel where only
important bugfixes that dont break anything else get in.
then the main trunk is gonna be like the development branch of the
kernel where all the new features etc go to be tested.
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
aah, now I get it.
1.0 is gonna be like the stable branch of the linux kernel where only
important bugfixes that dont break anything else get in.
then the main trunk is gonna be like the development branch of the
kernel where all the new features etc go to be tested.
Jeremy M. Dolan wrote:
I'd like to see a release candidate period for 1.0 put into place. In
the past serious bugs have slipped into milestone releases, and though
we'll likely be more careful this time about late check-ins, it seems
suicidal to indifferently schedule it as just another
RV wrote:
Jeremy M. Dolan wrote:
I'd like to see a release candidate period for 1.0 put into place. In
the past serious bugs have slipped into milestone releases, and though
we'll likely be more careful this time about late check-ins, it seems
suicidal to indifferently schedule it as just
It seems to me like 0.9.9 is almost going to be 1.0rc. From the roadmap
it doesn't seem like the tree is opening up after Wednesday til 1.0, and
it seems like the drivers aren't going to be approving anything of the
nature of rewrite how we do x or land massive new feature y...
Jeremy M.
Brendan Eich wrote:
http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html
Comments welcome. Questions too, so I might have something to put
... in the roadmap FAQ, I wrote -- but the rest of my message was
chopped due to an obscure Mozilla mail bug.
/be
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brendan Eich wrote:
http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html
Comments welcome.
Brendan,
I'd like to see a release candidate period for 1.0 put into place. In
the past serious bugs have slipped into milestone releases, and though
we'll likely be more careful this time
15 matches
Mail list logo
