Brendan Eich wrote:
> http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html
>
> Comments welcome. Questions too, so I might have something to put
>
Hello,
IMHO Mozilla is not ready for a 1.0 version.
April is too early for 1.0.
There are still some major bugs that still make problems.
For example, text fil
Oliver C. wrote:
> The last point is, that it still has some problems with showing websites
> correctly.
> For example Mozilla shows this website not correctly:
> http://www.interplay.com/giants/index2.html
> (This bug is known for about a year, don't know the bug number at the
> moment)
Not a
Oliver C. wrote:
> Brendan Eich wrote:
>
>> http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html
>>
>> Comments welcome. Questions too, so I might have something to put
>>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> IMHO Mozilla is not ready for a 1.0 version.
> April is too early for 1.0.
>
That didn't stop them with Netscape 6.0, i
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
>
> The two worst bugs currently in Mozilla, IMHO, is 55583 (view-source
> should show original page source) and 46845 (Form elements don't reset
> upon reloading page). They both cause very annoying dataloss, and they
> are both futured... :-(
>
> After them, standards c
Amen Jonas. Those are my two worst bugs also.
jon
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
> Oliver C. wrote:
>
>> The last point is, that it still has some problems with showing
>> websites correctly.
>> For example Mozilla shows this website not correctly:
>> http://www.interplay.com/giants/index2.html
>> (Th
jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> The two worst bugs currently in Mozilla, IMHO, is 55583 (view-source
>> should show original page source) and 46845 (Form elements don't reset
>> upon reloading page). They both cause very annoying dataloss, and the
