What I Mozilla?
I installed netscape 6, and I think I remember seeing a directory called
Mozilla under which my mail would have been listed. However I decided to
reinstall the netscape 6 program in another drive directory (partitioned
from my only hardware drive as D). Here there was no Mozilla
Winter Icefang wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > On 12 Feb 2001 13:35:01 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher Jahn)
> > wrote:
> >
> > >And it came to pass that wrote:
> > >
> > >>On 11 Feb 2001 21:23:54 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher
> > >>Jahn) wrote:
> > >>>The Personal Security
Christopher Jahn wrote:
>
> And it came to pass that Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Christopher Jahn wrote:
> >>
> >> And it came to pass that wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:15:32 -0500, jesus X
> >> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
And it came to pass that Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
>
>
>Christopher Jahn wrote:
>>
>> And it came to pass that wrote:
>>
>> >On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:15:32 -0500, jesus X
>> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >>> If that is true why have I been browsing the w
And it came to pass that wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:56:40 -0800, Winter Icefang
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>As near as I can tell, it uses a localhost connection to
>>access the Security Info section. You can set Zone Alarm to
>>allow only local traffic, if I remember right, and it'll
Christopher Jahn wrote:
>
> And it came to pass that wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:15:32 -0500, jesus X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> If that is true why have I been browsing the web without
> >>> giving Mozilla "server" permission? And why doesn't I
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:56:40 -0800, Winter Icefang
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>As near as I can tell, it uses a localhost connection to access the
>Security Info section. You can set Zone Alarm to allow only local
>traffic, if I remember right, and it'll work fine. As always, I'm sure
>someone
And it came to pass that wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:15:32 -0500, jesus X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> If that is true why have I been browsing the web without
>>> giving Mozilla "server" permission? And why doesn't IE or
>>> NS4 or Opera causes the prompt?
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 05:04:44 -0500, jesus X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The answer to your question is no, unless you want to browse web sites. If
> >you do indeed want to browse the web, then the answer is yes.
> >
>
> If that is true why have I been browsing the we
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >IT all depends on how each program acts with each program...
> OK, I understand that.
Good, because I wrote it horribly. I meant each firewall program acts with
each program that access the net. I seemed to have missed those little
details. :)
> Has anyone investigat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 12 Feb 2001 13:35:01 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher Jahn)
> wrote:
>
> >And it came to pass that wrote:
> >
> >>On 11 Feb 2001 21:23:54 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher
> >>Jahn) wrote:
> >>>The Personal Security Manager sets itself up as a proxy
> >>>ser
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:15:32 -0500, jesus X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> If that is true why have I been browsing the web without giving
>> Mozilla "server" permission? And why doesn't IE or NS4 or Opera causes
>> the prompt?
>
>IT all depends on how each program acts w
On 12 Feb 2001 13:35:01 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher Jahn)
wrote:
>And it came to pass that wrote:
>
>>On 11 Feb 2001 21:23:54 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher
>>Jahn) wrote:
>>>The Personal Security Manager sets itself up as a proxy
>>>server so you can make secure transactions. It i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If that is true why have I been browsing the web without giving
> Mozilla "server" permission? And why doesn't IE or NS4 or Opera causes
> the prompt?
IT all depends on how each program acts with each program. I've had Freedom
ask about IE's "server" abilities. Of cours
And it came to pass that wrote:
>On 11 Feb 2001 21:23:54 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher
>Jahn) wrote:
>>The Personal Security Manager sets itself up as a proxy
>>server so you can make secure transactions. It is necessary
>>for ZoneAlarm to accept this if you want to use the browser.
>>
>I
On 11 Feb 2001 21:23:54 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher Jahn)
wrote:
>The Personal Security Manager sets itself up as a proxy server
>so you can make secure transactions. It is necessary for
>ZoneAlarm to accept this if you want to use the browser.
>
I can use the browser without doing that
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 05:04:44 -0500, jesus X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The answer to your question is no, unless you want to browse web sites. If
>you do indeed want to browse the web, then the answer is yes.
>
If that is true why have I been browsing the web without giving
Mozilla "server" perm
And it came to pass that wrote:
>Does anyone know why Mozilla ( and NS6) causes ZoneAlarm to
>prompt for server access? Does Moz really need that?
>
>
The Personal Security Manager sets itself up as a proxy server
so you can make secure transactions. It is necessary for
ZoneAlarm to accept t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Does anyone know why Mozilla ( and NS6) causes ZoneAlarm to prompt for
> server access? Does Moz really need that?
Freedom says the same thing. It's purely in how it handles TCP/IP ports and
how ZoneAlarm and Freedom, et al, see IE versus other browsers. It's not
REA
Does anyone know why Mozilla ( and NS6) causes ZoneAlarm to prompt for
server access? Does Moz really need that?
Basic
20 matches
Mail list logo
