Re: Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do?

2001-12-18 Thread Tim Wunder
DeMoN LaG wrote: Morten Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 17 Dec 2001: Albert wrote: The only thing preventing my migration is an error message in RH 7.2 that says Warning! FAT32 support is still ALPHA! (nuisance only) and the fact that no

Re: Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do?

2001-12-18 Thread DeMoN LaG
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 18 Dec 2001: As someone who dual-boots (although I haven't booted into Windows for quite some time), access to a FAT32 partition is necessary. I'm surprised that RedHat 7.2 says the support is ALPHA. Linux

OTRe: Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do?

2001-12-18 Thread Tim Wunder
DeMoN LaG wrote: Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 18 Dec 2001: As someone who dual-boots (although I haven't booted into Windows for quite some time), access to a FAT32 partition is necessary. I'm surprised that RedHat 7.2 says the support

Re: OTRe: Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do?

2001-12-18 Thread Charlie in San Francisco
Tim Wunder wrote: DeMoN LaG wrote: Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 18 Dec 2001: As someone who dual-boots (although I haven't booted into Windows for quite some time), access to a FAT32 partition is necessary. I'm surprised that RedHat

Re: OTRe: Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do?

2001-12-18 Thread Kryptolus
Charlie in San Francisco wrote: Tim Wunder wrote: DeMoN LaG wrote: Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 18 Dec 2001: As someone who dual-boots (although I haven't booted into Windows for quite some time), access to a FAT32 partition is

Re: Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do?

2001-12-17 Thread Morten Nilsen
Albert wrote: The only thing preventing my migration is an error message in RH 7.2 that says Warning! FAT32 support is still ALPHA! (nuisance only) and the fact that no one supports USB wireless network cards =( Huh? last time I had a FAT32 partition, I used it with less trouble in

Re: Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do?

2001-12-17 Thread Albert
DeMoN LaG wrote: Morten Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:3C1828EC.5020908 @SPAM.nilsen.com, on 12 Dec 2001: I liked the graphic of the mozilla lizard toasting the IE logo :) /me goes and does a little IE-toasting himself rm -f sucky-ms-web-browser Tell ya what, so far linux has

Re: Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do?

2001-12-17 Thread DeMoN LaG
Morten Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 17 Dec 2001: Albert wrote: The only thing preventing my migration is an error message in RH 7.2 that says Warning! FAT32 support is still ALPHA! (nuisance only) and the fact that no one supports USB

Re: Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do?

2001-12-13 Thread Morten Nilsen
DeMoN LaG wrote: Morten Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:3C1828EC.5020908 @SPAM.nilsen.com, on 12 Dec 2001: I liked the graphic of the mozilla lizard toasting the IE logo :) /me goes and does a little IE-toasting himself rm -f sucky-ms-web-browser Tell ya what, so far linux has

Re: Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do?

2001-12-12 Thread Christopher Jahn
And it came to pass that wrote: http://www.mutato.too.it Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do? Mozilla Compatible is a statement against policy, IIRC. The idea is that pages are HTML compliant, and thus do not require any special browsers to be seen

Re: Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do?

2001-12-12 Thread Morten Nilsen
Christopher Jahn wrote: And it came to pass that wrote: http://www.mutato.too.it Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do? Mozilla Compatible is a statement against policy, IIRC. The idea is that pages are HTML compliant, and thus do not require any special browsers