Kryptolus wrote:
> Charlie in San Francisco wrote:
>>
>> What's "WINE"?
>>
>
> Wine Is Not an Emulator.
> It's an implementation of Windows API that runs on various OSes
> including Linux.
http://www.winehq.com/
Andrea
--
Andrea Monni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "It is our choices, Harry, that
Y!
Charlie in San Francisco wrote:
> Tim Wunder wrote:
>
>> DeMoN LaG wrote:
>>
>>> Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 18 Dec 2001:
>>>
As someone who dual-boots (although I haven't booted into Windows
for quite some time), access to
Tim Wunder wrote:
> DeMoN LaG wrote:
>
>> Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 18 Dec 2001:
>>
>>> As someone who dual-boots (although I haven't booted into Windows
>>> for quite some time), access to a FAT32 partition is necessary. I'm
>>> sur
DeMoN LaG wrote:
> Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 18 Dec 2001:
>
>>As someone who dual-boots (although I haven't booted into Windows
>>for quite some time), access to a FAT32 partition is necessary. I'm
>>surprised that RedHat 7.2 says th
Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 18 Dec 2001:
>
> As someone who dual-boots (although I haven't booted into Windows
> for quite some time), access to a FAT32 partition is necessary. I'm
> surprised that RedHat 7.2 says the support is ALPHA. Li
DeMoN LaG wrote:
> Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 17 Dec 2001:
>
>
>>Albert wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The only thing preventing my migration is an error message in RH
>>>7.2 that says "Warning! FAT32 support is still ALPHA!" (nuisance
>>>only)
Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 17 Dec 2001:
> Albert wrote:
>
>> The only thing preventing my migration is an error message in RH
>> 7.2 that says "Warning! FAT32 support is still ALPHA!" (nuisance
>> only) and the fact that no one supp
DeMoN LaG wrote:
>Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:3C1828EC.5020908
>@SPAM.nilsen.com, on 12 Dec 2001:
>
>>I liked the graphic of the mozilla lizard toasting the IE logo :)
>>
>>/me goes and does a little IE-toasting himself
>>
>
>rm -f sucky-ms-web-browser
>
>Tell ya what, so far
Albert wrote:
> The only thing preventing my migration is an error message in RH 7.2
> that says "Warning! FAT32 support is still ALPHA!" (nuisance only) and
> the fact that no one supports USB wireless network cards =(
>
Huh? last time I had a FAT32 partition, I used it with less trouble in
DeMoN LaG wrote:
> Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:3C1828EC.5020908
> @SPAM.nilsen.com, on 12 Dec 2001:
>
>>I liked the graphic of the mozilla lizard toasting the IE logo :)
>>
>>/me goes and does a little IE-toasting himself
>>
>
> rm -f sucky-ms-web-browser
>
> Tell ya what,
Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:3C1828EC.5020908
@SPAM.nilsen.com, on 12 Dec 2001:
>
> I liked the graphic of the mozilla lizard toasting the IE logo :)
>
> /me goes and does a little IE-toasting himself
rm -f sucky-ms-web-browser
Tell ya what, so far linux has Mozilla, linux h
Christopher Jahn wrote:
> And it came to pass that wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.mutato.too.it
>>
>>Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do?
>>
>>
>
> "Mozilla Compatible" is a statement against policy, IIRC. The
> idea is that pages are HTML compliant, and thus do not require
> any spec
And it came to pass that wrote:
> http://www.mutato.too.it
>
> Mozilla compatible - What do you think can I do?
>
"Mozilla Compatible" is a statement against policy, IIRC. The
idea is that pages are HTML compliant, and thus do not require
any special browsers to be seen.
--
}:-) Ch
13 matches
Mail list logo
