I totally can agree with you, this bug makes developers crazy, and have to
use another browser when need to check a posted page :(
Bests
CoL
"Brian S. Craigie" wrote:
> DeMoN LaG wrote:
>
> >Jon Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 21 Sep 2001:
> >
Hans Galema wrote:
> So pages are cached not sources?
> Why is the source trown away after the buildup of a page ?
very good question! i think it should be possible in any way to get the
source of the page mozilla actually shows. so, my question is: why it is
so hard to fix this?
IIRC, I hear
DeMoN LaG wrote:
>Jon Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 21 Sep 2001:
>
>>According to Mozilla apparently they view this as a feature, not a
>>bug. When people complained about it, they say it doesn't affect
>>the majority of users.
>>
>>I myself hav
DeMoN LaG wrote:
> > Um, unless I'm mistaken I thought I saw a checkin for this bug, fixing
> the problem so view source first attempts to pull the page from the
> cache, then reposting the data and generating a new page
>
That would be no good. The database behind would receive data twice.
So pa
Jon Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 21 Sep 2001:
> According to Mozilla apparently they view this as a feature, not a
> bug. When people complained about it, they say it doesn't affect
> the majority of users.
>
> I myself have stopped worrying ab
According to Mozilla apparently they view this as a feature, not a bug.
When people complained about it, they say it doesn't affect the majority
of users.
I myself have stopped worrying about NS6 compatibilty for all of my
sites, because it doesn't affect the majority of users
Even if I w
