Christopher Blizzard wrote:
Yes, please. In fact, I would just say shorten that to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of the overly-obscure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and just use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
security means different things to different people. I was thinking
that making the address of the list
Yes, please. In fact, I would just say shorten that to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of the overly-obscure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and just use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
security means different things to different people.
I'm surprised no-one has yet mentioned
http://www.wiretrip.net/rfp/policy.html .
On Tue, 09 Oct 2001 09:48:07 -0700, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of the above, I suggest we populate [EMAIL PROTECTED], because it's
IMO the most sensible and appropriate of the five.
Gerv
Except that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a public mailing list...
(BTW, Will the 'private' mailing
Mitchell Stoltz wrote:
What about the other list address, [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
OK with me, but I don't care much.
Seriously, a .announce style mailing list is a good idea.
Sounds fine to me, although I think the authoritative list should be a
webpage. We can do a mailing list too.
No, my
Left the file extension off the diff file, which garbled it. So, I'm
sending it again.
-Mitch
*** security-bugs-draft6.html Mon Oct 8 20:00:15 2001
--- security-bugs-draft7.html Mon Oct 8 20:26:16 2001
***
*** 1,6
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN
Mitchell Stoltz wrote
! pThe Mozilla security bug group will have a private mailing list,
! [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Good.
to which everyone in the security bug group will be subscribed. This
! list will act as a forum for discussing group policy
! and the addition of new members, as described
