Hi George,
Thanks. I'm checking out your page. Well, speed benchmarking isn't that tough
to do; but you have to be very careful about the quality benchmark. I have a
plan to make a webpage with that information, but I'll wait until I learn more
about it and can sum things up.
The opinions of the
Just a few lines to all who can interest it. There are Mp3 Encoders Speed
statistics at http://www.hispamp3.com/bench/index.htm. I will try to make a
quality study soon.
George
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
> From: "Gabriel Bouvigne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 15:14:56 +0100
>
> Now Proteron also got a windows encoder.
> So the questions are:
> is it also based on Lame like n2mp3?
> if this is the case, why is this company earning money from other's work?
>
>
>
Someone from ic
Now Proteron also got a windows encoder.
So the questions are:
is it also based on Lame like n2mp3?
if this is the case, why is this company earning money from other's work?
Regards,
Gabriel Bouvigne - France
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 12138873
MP3' Tech: www.mp3tech.org
(temporary down, alternat
From: Mark Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] pre-echo control for short block ?
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 20:20:39 -0700
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > (Though this question may have been answered several times,)
> > In psycho.c,
> > ---
> >/* pre-echo control */
> >/* rpelev=
> 1.
> Has anyone tried compiling LAME with MSVC's "Assume No Aliasing"
> option? I used to do some scientific computing, and I remember that
> this type of option was needed to get C performance up to the level of
Fortran.
I personnaly always use for Lame (and so mp3tech binaries) under vc6 the
