just did a massive search at the Winamp forum website and came up
with these:
http://forums.winamp.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000220.html
http://forums.winamp.com/ubb/Forum4/HTML/19.html
http://forums.winamp.com/ubb/Forum4/HTML/000163.html
Interesting bits:
*
Actually there is
> Sorry, that would have been 2.64... Thanks for the confirmation. Then my
> old in_mp3.dll mustn't have been overwritten during the setup.
The best idea is to rename the FHG dll to, say, in_mp3fhg.dll. This
ensures that the Winamp installer will not overwrite it. Then uncheck
the 'Layer 3' box
In the last episode (Jun 13), Dan Bridges said:
> I'm looking for a DOS/Win cmd line or even GUI util to do some or all
> of the following:
>
> Given: ARTIST_ -_ ALBUM_ -_ 01_ -_ TITLE.MP3
> use a cmd line like RENMP3 ARTIST_ -_ ALBUM_ -_ 01_ -_ TITLE.MP3 3 4
> to produce 01 - TITLE.MP3 or 0
I'm looking for a DOS/Win cmd line or even GUI util to do some or all of the
following:
Given: ARTIST_ -_ ALBUM_ -_ 01_ -_ TITLE.MP3
use a cmd line like RENMP3 ARTIST_ -_ ALBUM_ -_ 01_ -_ TITLE.MP3 3 4
to produce 01 - TITLE.MP3 or 01 - Title.MP3
Given: ARTIST - ALBUM - 1 - TITLE.MP3
use
THE PMD IS
FINALLY HERE !!
http://www.dst3.com/email.htm
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Lame will store its version number into the first (or more?) frame of
the mp3-file. With an old mp3-file, or an mp3-file converted by another
person, i can not see with what options the file was built. Is it
possible to include the options into the first frame? For example:
lame384 -mj -v1 -b128 -
Hi!
New test piece: "The Ecstasy Of Gold" by Ennio Morricone; <10sec; (very
complex part!)
The Encoders: lame 3.70; lame 3.81BETA; FHG 3.1DEMO; SCMPX 1.51; (constant
bitrate; 128kb/sec; highest possible quality;)
Personal rating (sound quality only):
1st place: The original sample.
2nd place:
I took all of this into consideration, but the binary hosted on mp3-tech.org
is nearly twice the size of the one on chat.ru
- Original Message -
From: "Takehiro Tominaga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame binar
Hello Ampex,
Sunday, June 11, 2000, 1:42:21 AM, you wrote:
A> Why are the lame windows binaries on chat.ru, and mp3-tech.org not
A> the same file size?
i'm using UPX executable packer http://upx.tsx.org
Best regards,
Dmitrymail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
MP3 ENCOD
or different compiler, different compile option, different library.
Z> Different versions, perhaps?
>> Why are the lame windows binaries on chat.ru, and mp3-tech.org
>> not the same file size?
---
Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you!
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Jason Antony wrote:
> I tried the sweep and 100only mp3s and the blips and dropouts were,
> to my ears, virtually identical to Winamp's Nitrane decoder. And they
> still haven't rectified this in 2.64, as Mark pointed out.
>
> P.S.: Sonique's Stardust decoder, AE4's predec
Chris Sidi schrieb am Son, 11 Jun 2000:
> In my case, the CPUs are identical (at least they should be - I should
> double check the company who built them got it right), only the platforms
> (and I guess the compilers used) are different. Do different platforms
> get slightly different results fo
> Should we let the two companies know of what's wrong by pointing them
> to the Winamp test page on the *Sourceforge mirror* [not LAME
> homepage]?
Of course, we should. Has anyone done so by now? Please confirm.
- Zia
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Different versions, perhaps?
> Why are the lame windows binaries on chat.ru, and mp3-tech.org not the
> same file size?
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Sorry, that would have been 2.64... Thanks for the confirmation. Then my old
in_mp3.dll mustn't have been overwritten during the setup. And the URL will be:
http://www.sulaco.org/mp3/winamp/
Has anyone informed nullsoft about it?
- Zia
> >
> > WinAmp 2.63 has been released... I didn't notice t
Hi all.
I usually encode music from cd like a:
$lame -h -b 192 input.wav output.mp3
Now I (discovered) tried option --preset cd,
which parameters are equal to those I use,
but there are some differences (no transitional band)...
Is that cd preset better than my usual commandline?
Is there some
Fascinating - how can you write an article on all these systems and completely
miss myplay.com?
Especially since much of my.mp3.com is a copy of myplay.com
(and especially since I can legally put up music for people to listen to -
http://www.myplay.com/mp/playlist/now_playing.jsp?plid=1634
Why are the lame windows binaries on chat.ru, and
mp3-tech.org not the same file size?
SeeHits
http://www.seehits.com
Web page counter service that offers real-time statistics,
like how many visitors you get, how they arrived at your site,
their screen resolution, operating systems, and more.
Quarbon
http://www.qarbon.com/
Quarbon has created Leelou, a free authoring tool which cre
> "Z" == Zia Mazhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Z> By the way, won't it be nice if the other developers of GOGO
Z> join the LAME project, like Takehiro did? :-)
don't you know GOGO team stopped thier development ?
GOGO 2.35 is the GOGO final..
---
Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source
Hi,
This formula is meant to calculate the threshold for MDCT from the threshold
for FFT. It indeed only works when that threshold is calculated for every
frequency bin.
>
> Hi,
>
> Tmdct(i) can be calculated directly from Tdft(i) with this formula:
>
> Tmdct(i) = (2/M) * Tdft(i) * (cos( 2*Pi*n
Changing Our Internet Rules - Yet Again.
==
RESUME: NAPSTER, my.MP3.com, SCOUR.NET, GNUTELLA, FREE.NET
==
NAPSTER
Napster provides a centra
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Alex Broadhead wrote:
> I traced the problem to the code for computing whether to insert a padding
> slot or not, which is written using floating point arithmetic. The two CPUs
> were getting different values in about the 15th place after the decimal
> (18th significant digit)
Hi there
just tested the latest Sonique player which claims its new MP3
decoder, AE4, is of "ultra high fidelity".
Guess again.
I tried the sweep and 100only mp3s and the blips and dropouts were,
to my ears, virtually identical to Winamp's Nitrane decoder. And they
still haven't rectified this
24 matches
Mail list logo
