So ABR is VBR that tries to match the average bit-rate to the user
supplied value ?
David
ABR is more like CBR without to be constraint to fit into a fixed bitrate,
so it is allowed to use frames of variable sizes, like VBR too.
ABR is a hybrid of CBR and VBR.
And yes, ABR tries to
Hi,
The dist10-code is part of the ISO 13818 standard.
So everyone can go to a good library and copy the standard.
(Here in Germany you need papers from a university or you
have to pay money ... but basically you can get this code
without any problems - and without hacking.)
If you look into
Hi,
The dist10-code is part of the ISO 13818 standard.
So everyone can go to a good library and copy the standard.
(Here in Germany you need papers from a university or you
have to pay money ... but basically you can get this code
without any problems - and without hacking.)
If you
Now that -Y has become default, to produce average bitrates of around 128
(joint-stereo), I have to select -V9. This compares to -V4 with the old
VBR. Does
it need some tuning?
I didn't tested it, but if -V9 is producing around 128k, I think the scale
needs to be changed.
And if it's
Mathew Hendry schrieb am Fre, 23 Jun 2000:
The -Y mode does seem to have problems, though. A five minute test track I
just encoded at -v 4 has spurious bleeps all the way through it. Smells
more like a logic error than a problem with the psychoacoustics.
-- Mat.
Hmm strange.
I don't
From: Robert Hegemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Mathew Hendry schrieb am Fre, 23 Jun 2000:
The -Y mode does seem to have problems, though. A five
minute test track I
just encoded at -v 4 has spurious bleeps all the way
through it. Smells
more like a logic error than a problem
on 00.6.24 0:27 AM, Iwasa Kazmi at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lame_errorf() was added in util.c.
I intend to replace fprintf(),printf(),assert() and exit()
with these macros.
That's really what I have been needed! Thanks a lot!
I can easily replace printf() to my GUI error handle function.
To all,
I'm not sure how to use this mailing list but I just
got a message which was addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
so I hope that's the correct place to send.
Anyway, the point of this note is that I've been
discussing with Jean Nicolle, (the author of MP3TRIM),
how to eliminate space at the
Thanks for the info. This makes it a little difficult
to look for empty frames since every frame will have
text in it, (and different text at that as the
versions change). Is there some set limit to the
length of the name + version string? So someone could
check for 'LAME' in the first 4 bytes
To all,
I'm not sure how to use this mailing list but I just
got a message which was addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
so I hope that's the correct place to send.
Anyway, the point of this note is that I've been
discussing with Jean Nicolle, (the author of MP3TRIM),
how to eliminate
At 23:10 22/06/00 +1200, you wrote:
It was Acy Stapp not Mark T that had a look at doing it but apparently the
Windows
ACM doesn't support VBR and I think it was abandoned. I'm not sure where the
problem is because I'm fairly sure that the Fraunhofer ACM does play VBR
MP3 WAV
files.
Hello,
Could someone just post an explanation of the differences between ABR and VBR. I
still don't understand the previous explanations completely.
Thanx
Here's yet more thoughts on all the different modes. They are based on
two different ideas about bit allocation:
1. Allocate bits based on
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Abe Corrie wrote:
Thanks for the info. This makes it a little difficult
to look for empty frames since every frame will have
text in it, (and different text at that as the
versions change). Is there some set limit to the
length of the name + version string? So someone
RE:
http://www.kenwoodcorp.com/i/topframes/press_sdrive_2620.html
Any comments?
--
Dmitry Boldyrev
Subband Software, Inc.
http://www.subband.com
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Hello All,
I tested to ogg encoder, and must say I'm somewhat disappointed.
Hardly not to after all those "mp3 killer" messages at slashdot etc...
I did a quick listening test, and if this is what lame sounded like
last year, as Mark said, then it has come a _long_ way.
It totally devastates:
From: Mark Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] new common macro
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 11:09:03 -0600
Hi all,
I added some macros in util.h.
These look great! But one small complaint: do we really
need a LAME_ASSERT macro for assert? assert is already
a
16 matches
Mail list logo