Has anyone else compiled Lame 3.57+ using DJGPP? I used pgcc-2.95.3 that
I compiled myself. Lame is the only thing that I've had problems with...
The latest version that I compiled is 3.61Beta and it compiles without
many problems, I've had to tweak a few things, but all in all, nothing
major that
Ok I compiled lame 3.61 with DJGPP and I also
compiled it with MSVC++ 5 SP3. I encoded the exact same file with the same
options but I used GNU diff and it said the the files differed. Is this
because the DOS version input is handled by libsndfile and the Win32 version is
not? Both resulting
If I try to encode ANY file with high quality on it
crashes right at the end with MSVC 5 and it doesn't work at all with the Intel
Compiler. There are no error codes except this. This is the exact
output.
C:\audiograbber>lame -h -k -b 160 -d -m s
1.wavLAME version 3.66 (www.sulaco.org/mp3)
or message similar
to the one I posted. So it gets cut off a little at the end.
Joshua Bahnsen
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2000 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] problems with HQ mode in
assume that encoding at 160 and
192 with recent versions of lame, it just gives the opportunity for
higher samples because there is more to work with, right?
Joshua Bahnsen
This is another question with filters, I guess. I
am looking to encode my entire Smashing Pumpkins CD collection, I previously did
this back in mid 1998, but then I used bladeenc because, at the time, it was the
fastest encoder I had access to. Now that they have a new album, I figured I
wou
.
Joshua Bahnsen
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Hegemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2000 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] V3.70 Default Mode
Takehiro Tominaga schrieb am Mon, 03 Apr 2000:
> It's not mistake. maybe
As an addition to my last email, I thought joint stereo was slower than
normal stereo, but with the binary I compiled with the Intel compiler, it's
still a good 5-6 percent faster than MSVC.
Joshua Bahnsen
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
seems to be joint stereo with the Intel compiler and
stereo
> > with MSVC 5, I encoded the same file with the same options with
executables
> > that I compiled with both MSVC 5 and the Intel Compiler 4.5. I used both
the
> > 3.70 branch and the 3.80 alpha branch, both do the s
y changing the if statement to:
>
>if (compression_ratio < 9.0) {
>
> ?
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
>
>
> > From: "Joshua Bahnsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 09:16:50 -0400
> >
> > To make sure I wasn't jus
I just noticed that my web page is linked from the
LAME web page. I think I should actually keep out with it. I'm going to switch
back to MSVC instead of intel, mainly because it will actually work with NT/2000
better.
Joshua Bahnsen
I haven't tried to compile lame with DJGPP in like 2 or 3 months, but when I
tried this time, I run into MAJOR problems with formatBitstream.c. Many
undefined symbols and parse errors and various other problems. I never ran
into any problems when I tried to compile before. Any suggestions, I'm usi
Good call! Thanks a million. That was too simple, guess I need to learn
more.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of spahm .
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 11:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Compiling with DJGPP 2.03
T
If you are looking for a great EQ plugin for winamp, I suggest you look at
DFX 3.0. It works GREAT! It gives it a total full sound. I can't stand to
listen to mp3s anymore without this plugin.
http://www.winamp.com/customize/detail.jhtml?componentId=11493
Josh
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http
I've been using this since you posted this message, I've played quite a few
mp3s and it refused to play one mp3. I was playing a playlist for an album
and it just skipped right over it. So I tried to just open that one file and
it doesn't play it. I know it was encoded with the Radium enhanced cod
This could possibly help, but most of the mp3s I play are on CD already. :(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of E. Zann
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 2:51 AM
To: Joshua Bahnsen
Subject: Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] new in_mpg123
Hi guys,
K> I ca
My friend has a P166, 64 MB of RAM, he got .80 or so with -h, .90 with it
off and 1.3 with -f. I had a P200, 128 MB of RAM, and I got realtime
with -h. With the 233 I have now it's not much faster.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Ivo
Sent:
any combination I can think of to see if it works. Same
thing every time.
Windows 98 SE is my OS. MSVC 5 the compiler.
Joshua Bahnsen
BTW,
I said screw the web page, I didn’t feel like updating. I’ve got better
things to do.
I defined "MMX_choose_table" using MSVC 5 and I came across problems in
takehiro.c. It said, "long" followed by "long" is illegal. I compiled it
with DJGPP with MMX support enabled and it compiled without any errors in
takehiro.c.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mathew Hendry
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2000 9:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Problems enabling MMX with MSVC 5
> From: "Joshua Bahnsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I defined "MMX_choose_table&quo
lf Of Takehiro Tominaga
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 8:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Problems enabling MMX with MSVC 5
>>>>> "J" == Joshua Bahnsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
J> I just realized that MMX_choose_table was never defined
What really does the cwlimit option do/change? That is one thing I am
clueless on.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Is it just me, or is it virtually impossible to encode VBR files with the
new VBR code with switches like this "-X 6 -V 0 -q 1 -b 128 -B 128 -F"?
Because it takes like 4 hours per song to encode. With the old VBR code it
takes 4-6 minutes. Something has changed I take it?
Josh
--
MP3 ENCODER mai
Was I reading a joke or what? I don't know about the "Crud" directory with
all of the *.c and *.h files... Or any of the other suggestions in this
readme. Why not use the Makefile? I know you have to download GNU make, but
it's all right there at the same place to download. You'd need gcc,
binutil
I was just testing something that I read in an earlier message, someone had
said that they acheived greater quality by using -b %rate% -B %rate%. I
don't use it for anything I encode, I was just testing out the VBR code. I
never noticed any better quality personally.
-Original Message-
F
Ar is part of the GNU binutils package. DJ Delorie has updated the binary
version of binutils to the 2.10 (the latest) the file name is bnu210b.zip.
This is from the manual page for ar.
"The GNU ar program creates, modifies, and extracts from archives. An
archive is a single file hold
Has there ever been any thought of using something like id3lib
http://id3lib.sourceforge.net to handle tagging?
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Is there any way to force a DOS box close after lame has completed encoding?
With the Windows binary, it exits properly but with the DOS one it just says
Finished and the box stays open. So if I'm using the DOS version to encode
with say audiograbber, I can never get to the next track without manu
w how that naming
scheme goes. I tried to hack around with a few things last night, with no
luck, I just wanted to see it work.
Joshua Bahnsen (in no way a programmer)
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Hegemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesda
I was wondering if there was any reason why the
printing of the GPSYCHO version number was commented out. I noticed a while back
that it had no longer been appearing, I wondered if there was any reason for
this, not that I really care what the version number is anyway.
Josh
Yes the output it identical.
Josh
- Original Message -
From: "David Balazic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 4:07 AM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] How to enable support for MMX/3D-Now/ISSE ?
> Alberto García wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Fra
mpxplay is a decent DOS mp3 player.
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan Blomquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 2:08 PM
Subject: [MP3 ENCODER] 16-Bit DOS LAME Binaries
> I was wondering if anyone would be or knows anyone who would be intere
I see in the Makefile that __NO_MATH_INLINES was added to fix a bug in gcc
2.8+, what bug is this, what does this do and why do you have it defined?
And what is RH_AMP?
Josh
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Hegemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 16
Another question would be, what version of gcc and binutils is being used
for DJGPP. I personally am using pgcc 2.95.3 and binutils 2.10, both of
which I compiled. That could make a difference. I'm still trying to figure
out why MMX_choose_table does not work (at least for me) with DJGPP. I found
7;m just happy I got it to work
properly. I learned a few things about nasm tonight anyway.
Joshua Bahnsen
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
By the way, COFF (the objcet file format that DJGPP uses) doesn't support
the align qualifier, which is why I removed it, afaik, nasm 0.98 doesn't
complain about this, but the version I have, a patched version to 0.98.1
does complain, I also read the nasm docs and it says it in there... Maybe
that
Well I've got some modifications to nasm.h and Makefile.DJGPP that should do
the trick to get the MMX functions to work right, very simple, but it
works...
Makefile.DJGPP
nasm.h
Is it just me or has no one else gotten an email in like 3 days??
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
I've had problems reaching sites in Sweden lately, I can't hit anything in
Sweden and then all of a sudden, it works... That may have something to do
with the mailing list problems.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Hegemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Aug
When using the latest CVS code, I cannot decode mp3s any longer it gives
me this error
Bitrate 9 kbps not legal for 44100 Hz output sampling
This is a 192 kBits 44.1 Stereo mp3. I've tried many different files,
all with the same result.
Josh
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3e
Are you sure about that? The Layer2 decoding code doesn't compile for
me, and when I try to decode it says something about bug!!?? or
something like that, every file I try to decode does it (mp3, I disabled
layer1 and layer2 for now just so it would compile).
Josh
"Sigbjørn Skjæret" wro
Now wouldn't a run at compile time mp3 encoder be awesome?? I actually know
BASIC, maybe I'll try it, I bet it will be just as good as the sample
nibbles code for QBASIC... Yeah, or maybe the NES emulator. ;-) It's REALLY
fast, yeah!
Josh
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
What exactly does normalizing a WAV file do? Is there a switch that is set
that tells the volume to play back or something??? This is confusing me.
Does it affect quality at all?
Josh
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
#include "sndfile.h"
should be added to version.c on or around line 25, sf_get_lib_version is
undefined otherwise. Of course it only makes a difference if you use
libsndfile, but it caused me a problem.
Joshua Bahnsen
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
on an *mp3* encoder mailing list
your feelings? Is Ogg Vorbis a final release? No, can you do better. Absolutely
not. Beta means "not entirely stable", work in progress; there are bugs to be
fixed. Here's my opinion, you're an asshole. But that's my opinion, so I guess it'
always IMNSHO) to understand Roel's e-mail
> as a chance to improve OGG VORBIS.
>
> BTW, please explain: am I allowed to report an OGG VORBIS bug just if
> and when you ask me?
>
> Just my $0.02,
>
> Heribert.
>
> PS:
> I don't know Roel personally.
>
>
The most recent main.c in CVS does not compile correctly for me with
MSVC 5. Worked fine last night, not now.
main.c
main.c(48) : error C2065: 'sample_t' : undeclared identifier
main.c(48) : error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before identifier
'Buffer'
main.c(48) : error C2065: 'Buffer' : un
If defined, what does ALLOW_MIXED do?
josh
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
I'm not sure when, but recently (within the last 2 days) int64 is undefined
for me compiling with DJGPP. I defined it in machine.h as a hack for me for
now, but it doesn't compile "out of the box", well only when using
MMX_choose_table. I can no longer use any optimzation higher than -O2, I
never
As a side note, I figured out the optimization problem, it was a faulty
build of the binutils package I was using.
Joshua Bahnsen
- Original Message -
From: "Joshua Bahnsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 7:19 PM
Subjec
I'm using the configure generated Makefile that I've changed to suit my
needs.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Hegemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] int64
Hi Joshua
> I'm not sure when, but recently
I don't have gtk-config on my system so when configure searches for it it
returns no like it should, but then it tries to run the program "no", I
assume to get the version # of gtk or something. So then in the makefile
HAVEGTK is defined even though I don't have it...
Josh
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing
As a side note to this question, is there a downside to using --nspsytune,
besides being slower, it sounds better.
Josh
- Original Message -
From: "Roel VdB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Hegemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 7:14 PM
Subject: Re[6]: [MP3 ENCOD
There is only a problem with the Intel compiler if
you compile on Win 95/98. If you actually use Win NT/2000 as your OS, binaries
compiled with the Intel compiler run just fine on NT/2000 and ME/95/98. If you
want an example, I've posted binaries of both VC5 and IC on http://www.geocities.com
ced a difference.
Josh
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Hegemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Intel Compiler
Joshua Bahnsen schrieb am Fre, 29 Sep 2000:
>
> There is only a problem
There is a new version of audiograbber available 1.70. It does have better
support for the lame dll and includes support for the vorbis dll. I was only
mentioning it because of the improved support for the lame dll. I personally
prefer cdex now, but I used audiograbber almost exclusively, audiogra
56 matches
Mail list logo
