Roel The graphs you provided show a lower noise, this because --nspsytune
Roel probably. It simply sounds poor, really poor. It sounds nothing like
Roel the original on my headphones.
Roel
Roel I use the one with the "RH extensions" from Dmitry. (thanks for all
Roel the compiles and hard
Hello Gargos,
Friday, October 06, 2000, 2:13:24 AM, you wrote:
GC Hello,
GC Roel, maybe you should give these settings a try on that track:
GC -V1 -mj -b128 -q2 -d -k --nspsytune --athlower -35 -X3
GC The bitrate stays pretty low (~224kbps) and it sounds very good...
GC almost identical to
also: isn't that "-35" not extremely harsh on the athlower?
I think that using a negative value with athlower is a bad idea.
Regards,
--
Gabriel Bouvigne - France
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mobile phone: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq: 12138873
MP3' Tech: www.mp3-tech.org
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list (
--
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:40:23
Roel VdB wrote:
It sounds much better on fatboy than the other options.
GC I'd like to hear your thoughts on these settings.
I think it's possibly only usable on this fatboy example. On velvet
it sounds really poor and the bitrate is much too high:
Im
Hello Gargos,
Saturday, October 07, 2000, 1:40:57 AM, you wrote:
GC Im not sure which part exactly you mean sounds very poor.
The graphs you provided show a lower noise, this because --nspsytune
probably. It simply sounds poor, really poor. It sounds nothing like
the original on my
Hello,
I use the one with the "RH extensions" from Dmitry. (thanks for all
the compiles and hard work Dmitry btw!)
Do you have a link to this version? I would like to try it out. Thanks.
Dibrom
10% cash back on all your calls through 2000 at Lycos Communications at
http://comm.lycos.com
--
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote:
From your recent postings I'm detecting that you think -q1 can only rarely
give a sonic improvement. In fact it is more likely to degrade the sound
over -q2? If so, the Roel recommendation of -q1, seems a little dangerous?
You think the extra
Hello Robert,
Thursday, October 05, 2000, 12:08:21 AM, you wrote:
RH I don't know any track where the use of -q1 improves sound quality
RH compared to a same sized -q2. That's why I'm asking you all.
The reason I use it on -V1 is: I don't get poorer quality (still
waiting for my
--
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:05:14
Roel VdB wrote:
Hello Robert,
Thursday, October 05, 2000, 12:08:21 AM, you wrote:
RH I don't know any track where the use of -q1 improves sound quality
RH compared to a same sized -q2. That's why I'm asking you all.
The reason I use it on
Robert Hegemann schrieb:
Mark Powell schrieb am Mon, 02 Okt 2000:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote:
does someone know any sample where a VBR encoded MP3 with -q1
gives a better sounding MP3 compared to a same sized VBR with -q2 ?
From your recent postings I'm detecting
Hello Gargos,
Thursday, October 05, 2000, 12:08:31 PM, you wrote:
GC Have you tried using -q1 on fatboy.wav? It sounds significantly
GC worse than -h or -q2. If you dont have this file let me know and
GC I will send it to you.
I agree that -q1 sounds worse on this one using "-V1 -mj -b128 -q1
Hello,
Roel, maybe you should give these settings a try on that track:
-V1 -mj -b128 -q2 -d -k --nspsytune --athlower -35 -X3
The bitrate stays pretty low (~224kbps) and it sounds very good... almost identical to
the original. These are the only settings I could find that produce a smaller
Mark Powell schrieb am Mon, 02 Okt 2000:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote:
does someone know any sample where a VBR encoded MP3 with -q1
gives a better sounding MP3 compared to a same sized VBR with -q2 ?
From your recent postings I'm detecting that you think -q1 can only
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Robert Hegemann wrote:
does someone know any sample where a VBR encoded MP3 with -q1
gives a better sounding MP3 compared to a same sized VBR with -q2 ?
From your recent postings I'm detecting that you think -q1 can only rarely
give a sonic improvement. In fact it is
Hi all,
does someone know any sample where a VBR encoded MP3 with -q1
gives a better sounding MP3 compared to a same sized VBR with -q2 ?
Ciao Robert
PS: for VBR -q2 equals -h and is the default if you leave out -qx, -h or -f
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
15 matches
Mail list logo